1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Air cutoff for engine retarding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
Air cutoff for engine retarding?

I just had a thought. As dangerous as that is but could an intake air cutoff work to retard the engine when going downhill? If so, what would be the drawbacks of such a system?

Edwin
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
bgilbert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,253
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute,IN
LOL, sure if you want to shut it down going down hill. Maybe if you had such a thing down stream of the turbo in the exhaust, create backpressure and that would retard the engine.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #3  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
I think it would cause massive oil consumption. Diesels are not typically set up to deal with vacuum on the valve seals, and the turbo seals wouldn't like it either.

Exhaust brake is a much better option.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
rebal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 3
From: Yuba city Kalifornia
Originally Posted by wannadiesel
I think it would cause massive oil consumption. Diesels are not typically set up to deal with vacuum on the valve seals, and the turbo seals wouldn't like it either.

Exhaust brake is a much better option.
I agree the engine would suck oil where ever it could
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
OK please don't ridicule me for such a dumb question. I thought better of it as soon as I clicked the submit button.

But. Just as an academic exercise and as long as you kept the crankcase full, how bad would it be for oil to be sucked past the valve guides and compressor seal? AFAIK the compressor seal is just a slinger and the oil would just be burned or shot out the tailpipe as soon as you got back on it.

Curious in Kansas

Edwin
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #6  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Valve guides wouldn't be bad, and on a non-intercooled truck the turbo seal thing wouldn't be that big a deal (other than the nasty smoke and associted deposit buildup). On an intercooled truck you'd get oil puddling in the intercooler, and you might get a big enough slug of it to hydro lock a cylinder when you built some boost and blew it through.

Wasn't a dumb question.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #7  
gman07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 1
From: Peoria, IL
Couldn't you also get runaway if you get oil through the compressor seal?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
No air = no runaway. Maybe when you opened the air shutoff the engine would rev up on the accumulated oil, though.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #9  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
Originally Posted by wannadiesel
No air = no runaway. Maybe when you opened the air shutoff the engine would rev up on the accumulated oil, though.
Yeah but if it did just HIT THE BRAKE!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #10  
gman07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 1
From: Peoria, IL
See, now my question was a dumb one! Wouldn't it be nice if my mind worked tonight...
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #11  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
My boss always told me the only dumb question is the one you didn't ask.

Edwin
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 11:13 PM
  #12  
torquefan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
It's not a bad idea at all, in theory. Unfortunately if you did it, it would suck in the preheater and intake manifold gaskets. You'd be replacing them all the time.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #13  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 1,063
From: Commerce, OK
Originally Posted by torquefan
It's not a bad idea at all, in theory. Unfortunately if you did it, it would suck in the preheater and intake manifold gaskets. You'd be replacing them all the time.
Air pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi. Even with a perfect vacuum that would be the maximum pressure pushing the gaskets in. If they will hold 30 psi of boost in they'll certainly hold 14.7 psi out.

Edwin
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #14  
JD730's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: Belvidere, NJ
This might be slightly off topic, but I have had the distinct pleasure of running a 1958 Mercedes Unimog once (25hp diesel, which I think is giving it alot of credit). The interesting part is that there is not throttle linkage hooked to the pump, only a shut down lever. Upon further investigation I traced a line going from the intake manifold to the injection pump, and before this line was a butterfly valve in the intake. The pump used vacum to throttle itself, what a goofy system, but it works (some how). Probably the only diesel I seen that runs vacum on the intake.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #15  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Some diesels do have air governors instead of flyweight governors. That is what you were seeing. That "butterfly" was a vane that measured airflow. More air = higher RPM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fixitagain
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
2
Mar 24, 2007 06:08 PM
mhuppertz
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Oct 31, 2006 01:39 PM
yannick
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
3
Feb 22, 2005 05:19 PM
lgi40
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
3
Jun 2, 2004 07:12 PM
joel
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
12
May 9, 2003 03:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.