3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

5.9 or 6.7 what to buy

Old Aug 20, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #31  
rstone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: College Station Texas
greygrizz the biggest problem I had was the fuel mileage difference in between the two. The 6.7 always went in to regen all the time at least twice a day. The edge attitude let me know when it did. I guess that what cause the bad fuel mileage.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #32  
Arkapigdiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rstone
greygrizz the biggest problem I had was the fuel mileage difference in between the two. The 6.7 always went in to regen all the time at least twice a day. The edge attitude let me know when it did. I guess that what cause the bad fuel mileage.
What was your HAND CALCULATED mileage on the 6.7 if you were driving STRICTLY highway?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 11:44 PM
  #33  
rig welder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Okotoks Alberta
I've had all three 12v, 5.9 and now the 6.7. I love the 6.7 and will stick with the 6.7 from here on in. with that said my 6.7 just went into the shop because of the emissions problem(like most 6.7s). With that said if you look back at all three engines there was something wrong with all them my 92 12v couldn't keep a tranny in it, my 98 5.9 like to eat up breaks and hubs(every 30,000) my 03 5.9 spit out 2 lift pumps(49&100,000)and now the 6.7 gets all plugged up and smokes like a bugger but I'd still go with the 6.7.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #34  
i6epoolguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: south Florida
[QUOTE=rig welder;1657268] just went into the shop because of the emissions problem(like most 6.7s).

I believe that you are wrong on this one. The percentage of people having problems is way lower than the people with no problems. Not saying we won't. I only have 4000 miles on mine and no problems. I'm just saying that for now most people are not having problems.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #35  
tcr's Avatar
tcr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by bigman
I think the 6.7 will eat your lunch in a drag race even with your tranny. They are pretty quick stock or at least mine was. And i am not a 6.7 fan......
Nope, I wouldn't have said it if I hadn't tried it. The only thing holding the 5.9s back is the tranny.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #36  
rstone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: College Station Texas
my hand cal was 13 mpg on the 6.7 and all highway and my 5.9 is 19 mpg all hand cal. All I could get out of the 6.7 was 400 miles to the tank and the 5.9 been getting me 600. I drive a 140 mile round trip to work so 200 miles to the tank is a lot for me. But I did love the 6-speed auto but it was not worth 200 miles less a tank.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #37  
rig welder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Okotoks Alberta
[QUOTE=i6epoolguy;1657449]
Originally Posted by rig welder
just went into the shop because of the emissions problem(like most 6.7s).

I believe that you are wrong on this one. The percentage of people having problems is way lower than the people with no problems. Not saying we won't. I only have 4000 miles on mine and no problems. I'm just saying that for now most people are not having problems.
Sorry, I knew this was going to happen, I would imagine the reason for saying (most 6.7) is because it left me on the side of the road with only 2300ks on the truck. I would imagine if your new truck left you on the side of the road you might have used the same phrase. My truck is used to to make me money, when it breaks down It cost me alot of money in lost wages I'll be sure to pick different phrases if I should ever have a break down again
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 09:28 AM
  #38  
newfy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant Beach, NJ
Originally Posted by ramble bee
All right no B.S. is the new 6.7 good as everybody says it is? I would like to buy a new truck just dodnt know if i should. I really want the new TRANs,I MOD very little small box or downloader airbox and so on.
THANKs for the help.
If you need a truck now, go with the 5.9, I would wait at least a year before I would get a 6.7, let them get the bugs worked out. My cousin just got a 6.7 & its been in the shop 6 times already, all electrical problems, I picked up my 5.9 in 2/07 ('07) & have not had any problems yet, & I use it daily in my contracting business, good power, nice working truck. One the other hand, my cousin loves his 6.7, when its running.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #39  
i6epoolguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: south Florida
No biggy rig welder. I just didn't want anyone trying to decide which engine to get, to think that EVERYbody is having trouble. And yes, I would be a little P.O.ed if my new truck left me standed. I believe they have the emissions stuff figured out now. I think one of the other problems is the fuel. These emission systems don't like sulfer. The sticker on the pump says ULSD , but is it really???? I know they are pretty strict on that stuff, but maybe some of the stations had some LSD in the tank still when they switched to ULSD???? Just a thought.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #40  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: UT
Originally Posted by i6epoolguy
No biggy rig welder. I just didn't want anyone trying to decide which engine to get, to think that EVERYbody is having trouble. And yes, I would be a little P.O.ed if my new truck left me standed. I believe they have the emissions stuff figured out now.
I think one of the other problems is the fuel. These emission systems don't like sulfer. The sticker on the pump says ULSD , but is it really???? I know they are pretty strict on that stuff, but maybe some of the stations had some LSD in the tank still when they switched to ULSD????[/QUOTE] Just a thought.[/QUOTE]

I 100% agree with this statement...If all they're having problems with his the emissions then why wouldn't you buy a new 6.7 with the 6 spd auto? I did and I'm not looking back! I had my 2005 5.9 in the shop more than it was in my own garage, so I got rid of it for the 6.7. Granted, I never had one single problem with the emissions or the engine, but what does it matter what the problem is or was? It's still in the shop non the less!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #41  
bigman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
Apache....

I made 8 trips to the dealer in 7000 miles. Finally they were going to keep my truck for 6 weeks for a new dpf that were on backorder. Thats when I threw in the towel. I only ran ulsd and ran it on the freeway everyday at 80mph. No mods. Some of the codes were low boost, to much boost, no boost detected yadda yadda. It seemed never ending. Give em some time they will figure it out i am sure. Just not on my time.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #42  
Apache1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Remote SE Arizona Desert Mtns
Thanks Bigman. At this point, you did the right thing.

As I mentioned earlier I plan to order an 09' 6.7. They should have it lined out by then. I just can't make 8 dealer trips 150 miles away along with the disruption that goes with it.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #43  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: UT
Agree'd and understandably so...I would have to admit, thats what I did and where I was at too..
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #44  
jrsmokestacks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
My 04' turned to stock got DESTROYED horribly by my dads 6.7 from every stop light. With the TS ramifier we were neck and neck. The 6.7 is no dog, pulls trailers like a freight train.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #45  
tcr's Avatar
tcr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by jrsmokestacks
My 04' turned to stock got DESTROYED horribly by my dads 6.7 from every stop light. With the TS ramifier we were neck and neck. The 6.7 is no dog, pulls trailers like a freight train.
You'll find that putting an auto up against a manual.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1980240D
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
13
Jun 11, 2007 10:03 AM
ABQFirefighter
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
17
Apr 18, 2007 05:40 PM
hemi_on
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
6
Oct 15, 2006 11:00 AM
BHD
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
12
Feb 9, 2006 04:28 PM
Badd Dogg Guy19
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
14
Apr 14, 2005 09:04 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.