3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

2008 4500/5500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #16  
torquefan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by GOTMEAT
From what I have read, the 450 has a 110 in the rear and the 550 has a 135?


What boggles me though is the increased tow ratings on these things over the 3500's and 2500's. I understand the payload difference, that's a no-brainer. But with the same motor and tranny, how do they increase the rating by changing the gear ratio? I think the 550 carries a GCW of 33,000. You can't tell me that that truck is going to move 33,000 as well as we can move 23,000.
I don't think the engine and transmission were ever the weak points. I think it's the bigger tires, wheels, brakes, frames etc. that make it able to tow heavier. It probably won't tow that weight any faster than a 2500, just more legal.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 10:19 PM
  #17  
displacedtexan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
From: Place with no quail:(
Originally Posted by torquefan
It probably won't tow that weight any faster than a 2500, just more legal.
And stop it faster...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #18  
GOTMEAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
While I agree that they are much better trucks for heavier weights, I'd like to see them with motor and tranny upgrades. I don't think that a lower gear, heavier suspension, frame and brakes justifies a 10,000 GCW difference.

I've been as high as 19,000 GCW and I feel that adding 7,000-14,000 more is not gonna make for a nice tow up grades.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #19  
abc4yew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1
From: Maritimes, Canada
Heavier axles...that with the bigger springs,brakes, lower gear ratio, etc is exactly what is needed to have a GCWR 10,000#'s higher. This is a formula that is as old as trucks themselves....the Cummins 5.9 was still available until recently in an F750 and maybe a F850 and could be custom ordered in a F650. I know the engine is good for it and I know a 48re can be build for it cause I towed alot from 33k to 38k combined and with the exhaust brake I felt I had a good reliable hauler that was safe.....I scaled selectively and never had a single problem (choose scales with 100% axle tolerances). The Rear springs didn't like me but a set of air bags would have probably punished the axle more so I let the springs take the burden. With a 4.56 gearset I could have towed a semi trailer if the truck had an extra rear axle and some bigggg air bags. ks
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #20  
prattman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Standard diesel exhaust brake. Got to like that.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #21  
Luke S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GOTMEAT
While I agree that they are much better trucks for heavier weights, I'd like to see them with motor and tranny upgrades. I don't think that a lower gear, heavier suspension, frame and brakes justifies a 10,000 GCW difference.

I've been as high as 19,000 GCW and I feel that adding 7,000-14,000 more is not gonna make for a nice tow up grades.
We've got plenty a power. Just needed more truck under it.

Here's 30,000 GCWR. With a mighty 160hp doing the pulling. Years ago a lot of road tractors didn't even have 200hp............................

Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #22  
GOTMEAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
These are all points well taken from those with more experience than me, but how well are these trucks towing grades and starting and such? I would think that more power would be the real deal with these heavier trucks.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #23  
boostjunkie1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Between SC,TN,VA!!!
Wink

Originally Posted by GOTMEAT
These are all points well taken from those with more experience than me, but how well are these trucks towing grades and starting and such? I would think that more power would be the real deal with these heavier trucks.
More Power is always better as long as you can put it through the trans and gears and to the pavement...... More Power allows for faster acceleration and such but there is a limit to where the power becomes useless in a diesel for towing because of EGT's. Our Cummins that is!! Larger CAT's. Cummins, Detroits, can handle the juice!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #24  
boostjunkie1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Between SC,TN,VA!!!
Towing Grades='s you have to see for yourself...... Much better than the DMax and PowerStroke at pulling Grades for sure!!!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #25  
Luke S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GOTMEAT
These are all points well taken from those with more experience than me, but how well are these trucks towing grades and starting and such? I would think that more power would be the real deal with these heavier trucks.
The trucks we have today, do not need more power. They have plenty to do everything they need to do for a truck of their size. Besides, with the new 6-speed auto transmissions and the lower gear ratios these trucks will have they will get the power to the tires, no problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wulfdiesel
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
22
Oct 21, 2007 06:19 PM
Guardrail
General Diesel Discussion
6
Mar 6, 2007 04:42 PM
justcampin
General Diesel Discussion
27
Feb 9, 2007 08:44 PM
RamThatStroker
General Diesel Discussion
28
May 29, 2003 07:38 PM
doomgaze
General Diesel Discussion
20
Jan 6, 2003 02:12 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.