Towing and Hauling / RV Discuss towing and hauling here. Share your tips and tricks. RV and camping discussion welcome.

pulling 43000lbs 3500 miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #106  
cditrani's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PeteRR
I think everybody's main concern was it's ability to stop, not necessarily the truck's ability to pull the load.
Sounds like he respected the fact that he was heavy and drove accordingly. Lots of the fully loaded class 8's out there can't stop at the speeds and following distances they drive, so what's it matter that they're legal?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #107  
mule3010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by PeteRR
I've shown the pic of his loaded rig to 3 different safety managers. All 3 said they planned to integrate it into their safety lectures.
Ya, but these are Kalifornia safety lectures, what does that mean for the rest of us? Just like "known to the state of Kalifornia to cause diaper rash/cancer", whatever. I guess that means the rest of us are safe?
Just kidding. California is just so wildly over regulated that some of us country boys from the live and let live states "chafe" Under the massive amount of rules and regs. No offence intended.
Joe
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #108  
PeteRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Originally Posted by mule3010
Ya, but these are Kalifornia safety lectures, what does that mean for the rest of us? Just like "known to the state of Kalifornia to cause diaper rash/cancer", whatever. I guess that means the rest of us are safe?
Just kidding. California is just so wildly over regulated that some of us country boys from the live and let live states "chafe" Under the massive amount of rules and regs. No offence intended.
Joe

At the time I was travelling, so one was in Sioux City, IA. One was in Muscle Shoals, AL, and the last was in Jersey.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #109  
ridofpwrstroke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Palmer Alaska
Originally Posted by cditrani
Sounds like he respected the fact that he was heavy and drove accordingly. Lots of the fully loaded class 8's out there can't stop at the speeds and following distances they drive, so what's it matter that they're legal?

Thank you. I never went over 50 mph. Mostly between 25-40 mph because that much weight likes to bounce over any small crack in the road. Curves I slowed way down. It took me one week to travel from South Dakota to Alaska. 3500 miles in 7 days equals 500 miles a day. Divided that by 18 hours on the road everyday and that equals 27 mph average. I averaged 8 mpg. The twins kept the egt's in check. Could I have gone 65? Sure, just wasnt safe. With the jake brake, I could just tap the brakes to slow it down on the hills. Kept them pretty cool.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #110  
mule3010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: Louisville, KY
Just out of curiosity why were you traveling the country showing pics of Ridofpwrstrokes load to various safety managers? Part of your job? Load envy? Sorry, I'm just curious.
Joe
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #111  
PeteRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Originally Posted by mule3010
Just out of curiosity why were you traveling the country showing pics of Ridofpwrstrokes load to various safety managers? Part of your job? Load envy? Sorry, I'm just curious.
Joe
I work as a contractor and sat through probably 25 safety orientations/lectures last year. Very boring stuff.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #112  
REF>Lancer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Lewiston ID
Originally Posted by cincydiesel
The engine will do it, however I've had 28780# on mine got the weight ticket to prove it. The truck did great, though the leather seats seemed alittle puckered at the end of my 400 mile trip. Fuel millage sucked, 9 mpg. Buy the way were is the scale reciept. 43000# I would have keeped that ticket for braggin rights. I kept mine.
Wheres the picture of that weight ticket?
I think I still have some from when I was driving OTR,anyone want to buy 86k weight tickets?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #113  
JKM's Avatar
JKM
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: SunnyVale Trailer Park
I have a weight ticket that reads 136 xxx (or close to it) lbs gross weight Pulled by a cummins i might add
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:41 PM
  #114  
deuceandahalf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I’ve hauled a few loads (15-1800 miles) in the 30-35K range with my 53’er, and the biggest problem I had was tires (E’s). Fortunately I had a compressor on board with 50’ of hose and an impact wrench and many spares. Speed was no problem, but like my buddy Jimbo Donley says, “Son, it ain’t the go that counts - it’s the whoa!” Seems to me our friend from Alaska did a pretty good job of driving.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:22 AM
  #115  
nelrod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: foothills of North Carolina
Thumbs up

I respect the man, he obviously knew what he was doing as evidenced by his success, the proof is in the pudding. I also respect the truck. Great job Ridofpowersroke - - - - -AND THANKS FOR SERVING OUR GREAT COUNTRY!!!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #116  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Originally Posted by nelrod
I respect the man, he obviously knew what he was doing as evidenced by his success, the proof is in the pudding.
I could find all kinds of examples of foolish behavior that people got away with once or twice. That does not make them evidence of good common sense. One emergency manuever or mechanical failure would have spelled disaster for this guy and everyone around him. Yeah, he got away with it, but it was not the smartest thing to do and I hope that it's not made a habit of or viewed as a precedent for others to imitate.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #117  
deuceandahalf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Scramblinman
One emergency manuever or mechanical failure would have spelled disaster for this guy and everyone around him.
Oh, for Pete's sake, that applies everytime you saddle up, regardless of the situation. I guess you could just stay in bed...
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #118  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Originally Posted by deuceandahalf
Oh, for Pete's sake, that applies everytime you saddle up, regardless of the situation. I guess you could just stay in bed...
Yeah, because there is no difference between having to perform an emergency manuever or experiencing a mechanical defect with 15,000 pounds than there is with 43,000 pounds. The handling and braking abilities are exactly the same, right? Using your logic, we might as well say that it is okay to use a pickup to pull 100,000 pounds as fast as you want.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #119  
nelrod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: foothills of North Carolina
If a bullfrog had wings, he wouldn't bump his a$$ on his hind legs either. What if this happened, what if that happend, what if a meteor came thru his cab roof, yada yada yada. LIKE I SAID- THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING. I didn't say it was wise or smart. If your that scared, go to church.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #120  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Saying that the proof is in the pudding seems to be tacit approval that this is an acceptable practice.

And I never thought that a disastrous mechanical failure would befall me, either. Until one did.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM.