Freefall for 120 miles ???
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Metro Area, MO
Freefall for 120 miles ???
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Tx.
Hmmm..Neat concept...
Hope the Navy doesn't take an interest in them... They'll stipulate that "just" a tailhook be added for their version. Then during testing up in Pax River MD, it'll require adding 50-100lbs of depleted uranium balance weights to the tip of the tail assy to compensate for the tailhook. THen it'll require a more powerful turbine engine because turbulator strips will be needed for the wing's upper surface to keep the platform "honest" at low speeds. Then the wings will be enlarged to handle the extra fuel due to the now decreased range, then someone would want hard points on the now-enlarged wings... then someone wants it to have all-weather, look-down RADAR since it obviously has weapons hardpoints. Then the parachute will be removed due to reduced carrying capacity.......
Sound familiar?
K.
Hope the Navy doesn't take an interest in them... They'll stipulate that "just" a tailhook be added for their version. Then during testing up in Pax River MD, it'll require adding 50-100lbs of depleted uranium balance weights to the tip of the tail assy to compensate for the tailhook. THen it'll require a more powerful turbine engine because turbulator strips will be needed for the wing's upper surface to keep the platform "honest" at low speeds. Then the wings will be enlarged to handle the extra fuel due to the now decreased range, then someone would want hard points on the now-enlarged wings... then someone wants it to have all-weather, look-down RADAR since it obviously has weapons hardpoints. Then the parachute will be removed due to reduced carrying capacity.......
Sound familiar?
K.
Trending Topics
Admin Team Leader
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,514
Likes: 207
Originally Posted by SoTexRattler
Can you imagine the jolt you'd get when you drop out of a moving airplane with those? OUCH!
K.
K.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161
Likes: 1
From: In the middle of Weather Dry Creek Farm in Avilla, Arkansas
Actually Top and I have been able to do that for years. Without the added bat wings.
Due to our aerodynamic shape, we just decend on our backs. Plenty of lift is provided but there are still a few problems with directional control, yaw primarily. That could be solved with a set of modified flippers.
Shortround out
Due to our aerodynamic shape, we just decend on our backs. Plenty of lift is provided but there are still a few problems with directional control, yaw primarily. That could be solved with a set of modified flippers.
Shortround out
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Central Coast Ca
Originally Posted by SoTexRattler
Hmmm..Neat concept...
Hope the Navy doesn't take an interest in them... They'll stipulate that "just" a tailhook be added for their version. Then during testing up in Pax River MD, it'll require adding 50-100lbs of depleted uranium balance weights to the tip of the tail assy to compensate for the tailhook. THen it'll require a more powerful turbine engine because turbulator strips will be needed for the wing's upper surface to keep the platform "honest" at low speeds. Then the wings will be enlarged to handle the extra fuel due to the now decreased range, then someone would want hard points on the now-enlarged wings... then someone wants it to have all-weather, look-down RADAR since it obviously has weapons hardpoints. Then the parachute will be removed due to reduced carrying capacity.......
Sound familiar?
K.
Hope the Navy doesn't take an interest in them... They'll stipulate that "just" a tailhook be added for their version. Then during testing up in Pax River MD, it'll require adding 50-100lbs of depleted uranium balance weights to the tip of the tail assy to compensate for the tailhook. THen it'll require a more powerful turbine engine because turbulator strips will be needed for the wing's upper surface to keep the platform "honest" at low speeds. Then the wings will be enlarged to handle the extra fuel due to the now decreased range, then someone would want hard points on the now-enlarged wings... then someone wants it to have all-weather, look-down RADAR since it obviously has weapons hardpoints. Then the parachute will be removed due to reduced carrying capacity.......
Sound familiar?
K.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
