3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

Question On 3rd Injection Event

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #1  
deezulsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: southern indiana
Question On 3rd Injection Event

Does anyone know if there is a way or if they are planning on offering anything that will allow us to alter the setting on the 3rd injection event? It seems like you could obtain better fuel mileage by doing this and running a cat delete pipe.
Reply
Old May 15, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
XLR8R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 3
From: Pattonville, Texas
The amount of fuel injected during the 3rd injection event is insignificant, and won't have a measurable effect on fuel economy.
Reply
Old May 15, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
pupeperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Northern Nevada
I thought I heard somewhere that Marco tried a 3rd event delete and Smarty lost 100 hp? If thats the case, it must squirt quite a bit of fuel through the 3rd event, or mebbe that's Marco's secret ... create a 3rd event that really is a 3rd event....
Reply
Old May 15, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #4  
RAMRODD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
It is the first injection (pilot injection) they need to get rid of. I know on a John Deere engine you save .2 gal an hour at idle when the pilot injection turns off.
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #5  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by deezulsmoke
Does anyone know if there is a way or if they are planning on offering anything that will allow us to alter the setting on the 3rd injection event? It seems like you could obtain better fuel mileage by doing this and running a cat delete pipe.
The engine is designed to use the third event to develop its rated power and do it within the emissions regs. The 3rd event is part emissions and part power so you can't just "turn it off". Without making other changes all you do mess up the powerband, generated power, etc.

The third event is not a constant event anyway. It only activates when the demand is sensed. Mileage loss is a result of a total design not just one part.

Removing the CAT is not going to gain much if anything at stock power levels as it is a relatively small restriction.

It is the first injection (pilot injection) they need to get rid of. I know on a John Deere engine you save .2 gal an hour at idle when the pilot injection turns off.
If it had a JD engine that might be true. The pilot injection has little effect on total fuel consumption and is quite probably a bonus for efficiency. The 305 engines do just fine with 2 events.
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #6  
Raspy's Avatar
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3
From: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
I wonder just what it is that causes the 325 to get less mileage than the 305. It's not the HP difference, I'm talking about the normal use mileage. Just cruising around and using 305 HP or less. Highway, city, etc.

There has been a lot of talk about it being the 3rd event that was the issue, but maybe not. Could be cam timing or injection timing too.

Wetspirit
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
no_6_oh_no's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: McDonough GA
Originally Posted by Wetspirit
I wonder just what it is that causes the 325 to get less mileage than the 305. It's not the HP difference, I'm talking about the normal use mileage. Just cruising around and using 305 HP or less. Highway, city, etc.

There has been a lot of talk about it being the 3rd event that was the issue, but maybe not. Could be cam timing or injection timing too.

Wetspirit
It is a given that 325 will use more fuel than 305, 265, 245, etc if you use the power, and, for the most part our driving style will reflect that. If you got it your gonna use it.

As I said, its the whole design that contributes not just one piece. Retarded injection timing, late exhaust valve timing, extendd valve overlap, and turbo drive pressure consistently higher than boost pressure equals emission engine which will almost always equate to less overall mileage.

It is entirely possible to drive these trucks all day and never have the 3rd event activate. Its contribution is mainly to enhance the power band, and, provide the heat for the CAT to work when the load demands push the engine into higher emissions. Eliminate the need for the previous and you eliminate the event. However, since valve timing and overlap is static there is an EGR effect across the rpm range that will be consistent. Once you start mixing exhaust gas with intake charge air to keep temps under control you start loosing a bit of efficiency due to incomplete combustion.
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #8  
TX_Diesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by pupeperson
I thought I heard somewhere that Marco tried a 3rd event delete and Smarty lost 100 hp? If thats the case, it must squirt quite a bit of fuel through the 3rd event, or mebbe that's Marco's secret ... create a 3rd event that really is a 3rd event....
Maybe Marco did delete it and that's why the new HOT version, these guys are seeing like 22mpg!!
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #9  
RAMRODD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
Originally Posted by RAMRODD
It is the first injection (pilot injection) they need to get rid of. I know on a John Deere engine you save .2 gal an hour at idle when the pilot injection turns off.
Originally Posted by no_6_oh_no
If it had a JD engine that might be true. The pilot injection has little effect on total fuel consumption and is quite probably a bonus for efficiency. The 305 engines do just fine with 2 events.
It did have a JD engine one was a 8.1L the other was their new 9.0 in a 8430 both tractors have fuel consumption gauges that give you Fuel consumption per hour. When the pilot injection turns off Fuel consumption goes down, and the engine sound changes. I believe JD just uses it so the engine warms up faster, not to make big power. The pilot injection on the Cummins is their for noise control and maby some emission control but not for Hot Rod Power!
In 1999 the powerstroke got pilot injection fuel mpg went down
in 2003 Cummins got pilot injection fuel mpg went down. I wonder why
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #10  
deezulsmoke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: southern indiana
Are they seeing 22mpg with the hot version? I have not been keeping up on the smarty. If they are seeing those numbers I will be getting one though.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #11  
01smoker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Rolla, MO and Blytheville, AR
I don't have any complaints with the fuel mileage on my truck. With only around 5000 miles on it right now its getting 18mpg. On its very first tank of fuel it got 16mpg. Its just getting better and better all the time. I always heard of the bad mileage that the earlier 3rd gens were getting but my 07 5.9 has been doing surprisingly great already.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
napa 600
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
30
Feb 6, 2008 10:51 AM
eastmentCTD600
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
7
Jun 10, 2006 08:10 AM
blown32
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
25
Apr 17, 2006 04:16 PM
Superduty
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
26
Sep 4, 2005 11:59 AM
handymantim
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
8
Jun 4, 2005 10:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.