3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

3rd injection event info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #1  
blown32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne Wyoming
3rd injection event info

Just received a newsletter from Cummins that in part states:

"There are actually three separate injections or “pulses” per cycle – the pilot injection pulse, the main combustion charge pulse, and the post injection pulse. Using three fuel pulses enables Cummins engineers to substantially reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons because it’s a much more efficient burn"


I have read a few posts where folks have questioned if a 3rd event occurs. According to the newsletter it does.

Now if we could just figure out how to turn it off (for testing purposes) to see if mileage is affected and if so by how much. Might be an interesting experiment.

Just a thought
Allen
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #2  
HighTen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 1
From: Nevada
Although, if the third injection event makes the burn more efficient like your quote says, wouldn't that mean the third injection event increases fuel economy? More effeicent = less fuel to produce the same power?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #3  
blown32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne Wyoming
I don’t believe the third event increases efficiency, I believe it serves the other listed reason, to reduce emissions. Now I am not suggesting that we modify our trucks to make them illegal but it would be interesting to see the impact to fuel mileage. Most likely, the cat would have to be removed (again I am not suggesting removing the cat and violating federal emissions standards) as the general thought is that the third event is wasted fuel just to keep exhaust gas temp high enough to keep the cat lit-off (functioning).

I am just curious to see what the reduced emissions is costing in fuel consumption, if it costs anything at all?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
HaulinBut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Hey Blown,

So do you suppose this could be one of those situations where Curiosity Kills The CAT?
yuk yuk yuk
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #5  
blown32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne Wyoming


But seriously, I would bet that if the third event were to be turned off with the Kat in-place it would eventually die (become plugged?)
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #6  
Lurch519's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Youngtown, Arizona
Or if the exhaust was insulated to minimize heat loss, could the exhaust temps be kept high enough to burn the crud out of the cat and not waste fuel ?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #7  
4X4 HULK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: California
For the ones that do not have a Kat, it would a nice increase in fuel mileage.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #8  
walt_mink's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
So, can we get our hands on the programming of the injectors to discard the third event? I imagine this would be done at the ECU, but you should be able to filter the third event inline with the injectors too ... the signal to them can't be much more than 0-1-0. Anyone, Bueller?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2005 | 04:54 AM
  #9  
John Rodriguez's Avatar
Tire Hater
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Laredo, Texas
Nope not hard at all, except for the fact your forgetting frequency and duration. Obviously the 3rd injection event would not be the same putzing around town at 1,200rpm as opposed to 2,400rpm going up a grade. Then you might filter a good pulse out, ouch. It needs to be done in the ECU, but I have a feeling that soon enough someone will figure it out and release it to the GP.
Originally Posted by walt_mink
So, can we get our hands on the programming of the injectors to discard the third event? I imagine this would be done at the ECU, but you should be able to filter the third event inline with the injectors too ... the signal to them can't be much more than 0-1-0. Anyone, Bueller?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #10  
John Halter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in northwestern ohio....Mansfield, Oh
Doesn't the third event stop when exhaust temps gets hot enough to keep the kitty clean and wouldn't that be why the fuel MPG is so poor around town but if we head down the highway at 65 some of the 3rd generations can get 20 MPG or better. I guess my question is if this is correct is thier a way to fool the sensor and have it turn off the 3rd event for us? Also if this is correct won't we be seeing a lot worse MPG this winter and what is the reason for the first event it doesn't make sense that would be for emisions does it? Maybe just mounting the sensor some place that heats up faster would help or maybe I am just up to late.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #11  
John Rodriguez's Avatar
Tire Hater
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Laredo, Texas
There is no sensor for it, nor is there a pyro to control it. The ecu has a table for it computed from all stock sensors. The first injector event is why our engines are called "Echo" engines, it makes it quieter. Small pulse, main pulse, 3rd injector event.
Originally Posted by John Halter
Doesn't the third event stop when exhaust temps gets hot enough to keep the kitty clean and wouldn't that be why the fuel MPG is so poor around town but if we head down the highway at 65 some of the 3rd generations can get 20 MPG or better. I guess my question is if this is correct is thier a way to fool the sensor and have it turn off the 3rd event for us? Also if this is correct won't we be seeing a lot worse MPG this winter and what is the reason for the first event it doesn't make sense that would be for emisions does it? Maybe just mounting the sensor some place that heats up faster would help or maybe I am just up to late.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 07:24 AM
  #12  
John Halter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in northwestern ohio....Mansfield, Oh
Thanks John Am I correct In my thinking that the 3rd event shuts off when the engine warms up or is this wrong also. I wasn't thinking a pyro by the kitty I was thinking the water temp sensor in block could be fooled some how. I was hoping maybe thier is a seperate wire from the sensor to the ECM we could increase voltage to and not mess up our dash readings. Our maybe I just got up to early , thanks for your reply.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #13  
John Rodriguez's Avatar
Tire Hater
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Laredo, Texas
Well, it's not water temp sensor because that controls alot of thing, it's no one-set sensor, just how the ECU is setup to make the truck run and accelerate, it's setup for 3rd injection event. It wasn't an afterthought put in, the whole system was DESIGNED for the third injection event, and a computer reflash would be neccessary to remove it.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #14  
signature600's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, Ohio
I didn't think the 03-04 engines had the third injection...hence no CAT. I thought the third injection was an 04.5-up 600/610 addition to meet ever increasing Tier 3 regs.

Chris
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #15  
blown32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne Wyoming
Chris,

That is my understanding as well, 3rd event only on 04.5 and newer. The Cummins newsleter I copied the first post from was talking about the later trucks.

Sure would like to see this put to the test.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.