2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain Discussion for all Dodge Rams from 1994 through 2002. Please, no engine or drivetrain discussion.

255/85r16

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
bigboyky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
255/85r16

Anybody ever use this size? Conversion chart says 33x10x16.... The tires are Thornbirds. Anybody ever use these?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #2  
MARKY MARK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
I don't have experience in that size yet but I will be buying some Cooper Discoverer ST's this fall in the 255/85/16. Narrower than 285's but a little taller.

Mark
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #3  
Tiny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Salem, Ohio
I run them in an AT tire, like the way they dig. Seem to wear better, and they decrease the wander when going down the road. Downside is they leave ruts in the yard or any soft material.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #4  
gandrews's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: California
I've been running 255/85/16 for a couple of years now. I like the size as they are the tallest tires that I have found that are narrow enough for DRW. I have had trouble finding them in anything other than a mud and snow. I just replaced some Dunlop ATs (which I would have gone back to, but they were out of production) with Toyo M55s.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
TxDiesel007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 2
From: Laredo
Cummins4Life

Has them in the BFG mud terrain, no complains that i know of, and they look sweet... check out his gallery...

Tx
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #6  
vssman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Naugatuck, CT
I've been running 255's for quite a few years and like them. They definately fill up the wells nicely. Not much different in 'sway' when compared to stock although I don't push it too hard through the corners. Mine are listed as 33.3" tall.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #7  
dgm1958's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Evart,Michigan
I have dunlop mts they dig in real good but seam to be wearing fast thetirerack.com has them a good price also that size in other brands
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #8  
HappyGA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Waycross, GA
someone check me, but I thought a 33" tire was 305 and not 255.

Maybe I have been misunderstanding tire sizing or something, but my truck has 305/75/16's on it now, and they are equivalent to 33's.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
dgm1958's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Evart,Michigan
your tires are 33s but its not the 305 part that makes all the differnce the 2nd number is percentage of the frist 255mm wide 85% of that is side wall height on 16 in rim so 255/85R16 my dunlopes list as 33.6" if you want to do a good comparson check the tire calculater at 1010tires.com
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NO_SPRK
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
19
Nov 17, 2009 12:31 PM
RollsCoal
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
13
Oct 28, 2009 10:37 AM
MoparMarv
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
44
Dec 15, 2007 10:36 PM
Sask
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
3
Jun 12, 2007 02:34 AM
doomgaze
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
3
Mar 20, 2006 05:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.