12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain Talk about the 12V engine and drivetrain here. This is for 1994-1998.5 engine and drivetrain discussion only.

Adding Hydro Boost to my 96

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2004, 05:08 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
MCummings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Laredo, Tx, 7 hours south of Dallas
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rubber line only.

Please don't pinch the metal line.

GREAT thread BTW.

Merrick
Old 04-18-2004, 01:10 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
torquefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,449
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
Boner- your 96, if a 2500, should have stock 24 mm wheel cylinders on it. I have never done this on a 2wd, but on 4x4's I upgrade the wheel cylinders to 27 mm units from a ram 3500. With these cyls. the brakes are biased a lot more to the rear. I don't know if I would go to anything bigger.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:37 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
The Chevy cylinders are about 30mm and work great.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:12 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
torquefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,449
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
Holy Cow! That's a big difference from stock. Might have to try that sometimes. Do you find the rear antilock engages a lot when stopping with those?
Old 04-20-2004, 09:27 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally posted by torquefan
Holy Cow! That's a big difference from stock. Might have to try that sometimes. Do you find the rear antilock engages a lot when stopping with those?
I haven't noticed any difference with the ABS, just less pedal effort.
Old 04-21-2004, 11:32 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Ray,IN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by infidel
Ray, because the Chevy cylinders are even bigger than the Dodge 3500 ones.
I have a table somewhere that equates cylinder diameter x pressure = force, just a few hundredths inch larger multiplies out too several hundred pounds more braking force.
The bore on the Dodge 1T wheel cylinders is .125" larger than the 3/4T cylinders. How much larger are the Chev cylinders?
Old 04-22-2004, 09:41 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
The Chevy cylinders are 1.875" (30mm)
stock 2500s are 24mm
stock 3500s are 27mm

The 2500s starting using 27mm cylinders sometime around '98-'99
Old 05-15-2004, 03:41 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
The chevy cylinders have 56.25% more area (meaning more force on the shoes for the same pressure in the brake line) than the older cylinders of the 2500.
The stock 3500 cylinders have 26.56% more area than the older 2500s.
And the chevy cylinders have 23.45% more area than the stock 3500 cylinders.

The relation is the area of the piston x pressure. Pounds per square inch x square inch = pounds.
For a circle it's r x r x pi for the area.

Just flinging in my 2c

AlpineRAM
Old 05-15-2004, 08:52 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Alpine, I assumed a hydraulic force of 500 psi and came out with this. Not sure what the units are or if my calculation is even correct as I mixed mm with psi.

2500 - 24mm=22k (lbs per cylinder force?)
3500 - 27mm=28k
GMC - 30mm=35k

Even if the number I came up with isn't a true unit of measurement it still shows the increase in braking force as the wheel cylinder size increases.
Old 05-16-2004, 02:00 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
For 500 psi the cylinder of an
2500 will act with a force of 350,6pounds on each piston.
3500 with 443,72 pounds per piston
GMC with 547.8 pounds per piston.

AlpineRAM
Old 05-16-2004, 10:55 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Jeremy Cusick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Allendale, IL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I'll upgrade to the chevy wheel cylinders sometime this summer!
Old 12-05-2004, 03:49 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
DustyRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Left Coast, (Right Wing)
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to say thanks to you guys. Not to blow smoke, but give credit where its due. I was poking around to see if I could improve my braking on the 3500. Found it!, with part numbers no less. At that price I am going to do the Chevy upgrade. Infidel, others and DTR Thanks ! I sold my 02 for my 97, the brakes on the 02 that had 4 wheel discs and anti-locks on all four was fantatstic. The 97 is just OK but have to push the pedal alot harder. This should help.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Onemoparnut
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
10
07-09-2007 10:59 PM
Flashman
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
1
06-11-2007 08:53 PM
Hairy1
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
16
03-31-2007 04:51 PM
wcbcruzer
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
2
02-24-2007 08:33 AM
ironman
HELP!
12
09-02-2004 08:36 PM



Quick Reply: Adding Hydro Boost to my 96



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.