Hybrids vs. Diesel
#1
Hybrids vs. Diesel
A little tidbit I caught in the paper this morning,
Surveys of owners of hybrid-powered automobiles show that, on the average, each is saving about 408 gallons of fuel a year or, based on recent gasoline prices, about $900 annually.
That's according to surveys of almost 1,000 people by Carnegie Mellon University engineering, science and public-policy students.
The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.
By comparison, hybrid owners experienced only a modest change in the amount of driving that they did, the study said. That could be because fewer hybrid owners apparently use their cars as primary vehicles.
There was a clear difference between owners of hybrids and diesels, said Scott Matthews, an assistant engineering and public-policy professor. "The diesel owners tended to be gear heads who wanted to drive quite a lot, and weren't as concerned about fuel and emissions issues. But the hybrid owners were more concerned about environmental concerns and saving fuel."
http://www.rocklintoday.com/news/tem...=1998&zoneid=1
It made me chuckle, anyways...
Surveys of owners of hybrid-powered automobiles show that, on the average, each is saving about 408 gallons of fuel a year or, based on recent gasoline prices, about $900 annually.
That's according to surveys of almost 1,000 people by Carnegie Mellon University engineering, science and public-policy students.
The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.
By comparison, hybrid owners experienced only a modest change in the amount of driving that they did, the study said. That could be because fewer hybrid owners apparently use their cars as primary vehicles.
There was a clear difference between owners of hybrids and diesels, said Scott Matthews, an assistant engineering and public-policy professor. "The diesel owners tended to be gear heads who wanted to drive quite a lot, and weren't as concerned about fuel and emissions issues. But the hybrid owners were more concerned about environmental concerns and saving fuel."
http://www.rocklintoday.com/news/tem...=1998&zoneid=1
It made me chuckle, anyways...
#2
Administrator / Scooter Bum
".........But the hybrid owners were more concerned about environmental concerns and saving fuel."
"The Hybrid owners were more concerned with the ability to ride the HOV lanes without having more than one person in the car."
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Owensboro KY
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder what they'd say about the new CTD hybrid . It's really against Federal regulation for states to allow hybrids in the HOV lane but the Feds aren't cracking down on it . But allowing them there is nonsense . They are at speeds burning gas . Don't tell me they are using less fuel than what is saved with two or more people using a small economy car .
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..
Your savings just went up in smoke..
Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.
Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.
Jason
Your savings just went up in smoke..
Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.
Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.
Jason
#5
1st Generation Admin
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but there's already talk in some states of coming up with a new tax to compensate for the lost revenue due to the reduction in petrol sales.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Battle Creek Michigan
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BC847
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but there's already talk in some states of coming up with a new tax to compensate for the lost revenue due to the reduction in petrol sales.
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but there's already talk in some states of coming up with a new tax to compensate for the lost revenue due to the reduction in petrol sales.
#7
Administrator
Originally posted by Scubasteve
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..
Your savings just went up in smoke..
Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.
Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.
Jason
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..
Your savings just went up in smoke..
Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.
Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.
Jason
Trending Topics
#8
Adminstrator-ess
Originally posted by Scubasteve
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..
Your savings just went up in smoke..
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..
Your savings just went up in smoke..
#10
This is why the TDI (or other fuel efficient diesel powered car) is looking better and better when compared to any Hybrid. It's pretty much a historical Fact that technology is bumpy in the first few years, this is my main fear about Hybrids. I don't want to be the guy getting interviewed on 20/20 about how our car needed $3,000 in bateries, $250 in software upgrades and a $900 alternator......
It's gonna take some getting used to, I don't want to be part of the test market for these cars.
The little turbo diesels just sound cool anyway, not to mention the prospect of Bio taking off in the near future.
It's gonna take some getting used to, I don't want to be part of the test market for these cars.
The little turbo diesels just sound cool anyway, not to mention the prospect of Bio taking off in the near future.
#11
Adminstrator-ess
Originally posted by Begle1
How much do the batteries cost? $5,000 if I recall correctly?
How much do the batteries cost? $5,000 if I recall correctly?
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shovelhead
It should have said.....
"The Hybrid owners were more concerned with the ability to ride the HOV lanes without having more than one person in the car."
It should have said.....
"The Hybrid owners were more concerned with the ability to ride the HOV lanes without having more than one person in the car."
Brian Elfert
#13
Administrator / Scooter Bum
My statement applies to the Washington DC area.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shovelhead
My statement applies to the Washington DC area.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
My statement applies to the Washington DC area.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
There are rumors that VDOT may soon ban single passenger hybrids from the HOV lanes.
I'm not sure why a hybrid should get any better treatment than a high mileage diesel anyhow. A TDI can do as well or better in the MPG category, especially on the highway.
Brian Elfert
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hybrids vs. Diesel
Originally posted by Begle1
The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.
The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.
I would certainly drive far less and still spend more on fuel if my truck was my only vehicle. I often decide it isn't worth doing something if I need to take the truck since it drinks so much fuel compared to my car. The truck is primarily for pulling my RV and it does less of that with the high fuel prices.
Brian Elfert