Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

Hybrids vs. Diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #1  
Begle1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
Hybrids vs. Diesel

A little tidbit I caught in the paper this morning,

Surveys of owners of hybrid-powered automobiles show that, on the average, each is saving about 408 gallons of fuel a year or, based on recent gasoline prices, about $900 annually.

That's according to surveys of almost 1,000 people by Carnegie Mellon University engineering, science and public-policy students.

The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.

By comparison, hybrid owners experienced only a modest change in the amount of driving that they did, the study said. That could be because fewer hybrid owners apparently use their cars as primary vehicles.

There was a clear difference between owners of hybrids and diesels, said Scott Matthews, an assistant engineering and public-policy professor. "The diesel owners tended to be gear heads who wanted to drive quite a lot, and weren't as concerned about fuel and emissions issues. But the hybrid owners were more concerned about environmental concerns and saving fuel."

http://www.rocklintoday.com/news/tem...=1998&zoneid=1



It made me chuckle, anyways...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #2  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,086
Likes: 49
From: Central VA
".........But the hybrid owners were more concerned about environmental concerns and saving fuel."
It should have said.....
"The Hybrid owners were more concerned with the ability to ride the HOV lanes without having more than one person in the car."
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 02:13 PM
  #3  
RickG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: Owensboro KY
I wonder what they'd say about the new CTD hybrid . It's really against Federal regulation for states to allow hybrids in the HOV lane but the Feds aren't cracking down on it . But allowing them there is nonsense . They are at speeds burning gas . Don't tell me they are using less fuel than what is saved with two or more people using a small economy car .
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #4  
Scubasteve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Ontario,Canada
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..


Your savings just went up in smoke..


Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.

Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.


Jason
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
BC847's Avatar
1st Generation Admin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 118
From: Buies Creek, NC
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but there's already talk in some states of coming up with a new tax to compensate for the lost revenue due to the reduction in petrol sales.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #6  
herb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Battle Creek Michigan
Originally posted by BC847
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but there's already talk in some states of coming up with a new tax to compensate for the lost revenue due to the reduction in petrol sales.
That surely doesn't come as a surprise?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
jrs_dodge_diesel's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 40
From: League City, TX
Originally posted by Scubasteve
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..


Your savings just went up in smoke..


Vehicle costs should be based on the life of the vehicle or atleast 5 years, anything less is not worth the paper its written on and that goes for any vehicle out there.

Its the only way to get a true cost for a vehicle.


Jason
Yep, batteries don't last forever, and these ones are most likely not to be found at Kragens, or Radio Shack.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Originally posted by Scubasteve
Wait till it needs a new battery pack..


Your savings just went up in smoke..
That's why anyone who wants a hybrid ought to lease it and turn it in when the lease is up. Not a vehicle that makes economic sense long-term.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #9  
Begle1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
How much do the batteries cost? $5,000 if I recall correctly?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #10  
P.J's Avatar
P.J
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 2
From: Port Deposit, MD
This is why the TDI (or other fuel efficient diesel powered car) is looking better and better when compared to any Hybrid. It's pretty much a historical Fact that technology is bumpy in the first few years, this is my main fear about Hybrids. I don't want to be the guy getting interviewed on 20/20 about how our car needed $3,000 in bateries, $250 in software upgrades and a $900 alternator......
It's gonna take some getting used to, I don't want to be part of the test market for these cars.
The little turbo diesels just sound cool anyway, not to mention the prospect of Bio taking off in the near future.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 05:30 AM
  #11  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Originally posted by Begle1
How much do the batteries cost? $5,000 if I recall correctly?
Starting at. That's why I think buying a hybrid is stupid. Would you buy a car if you knew that no matter how well you maintained it the engine would die in 3 - 5 years? Then why buy a car that will need something just as expensive? It's just to buy one. People who lease 'em at least have half a brain.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #12  
belfert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally posted by Shovelhead
It should have said.....
"The Hybrid owners were more concerned with the ability to ride the HOV lanes without having more than one person in the car."
They still sell a lot of hybrids out here in the Midwest and I'm not aware of any HOV lanes in the Midwest that allow single passenger hybrids.

Brian Elfert
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #13  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,086
Likes: 49
From: Central VA
My statement applies to the Washington DC area.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
belfert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally posted by Shovelhead
My statement applies to the Washington DC area.
When asked why people were on waiting lists for new Hybrids, the overwhelming majority of DC area buyers stated they wanted one to drive in the HOV lanes.
Your statement seemed pretty general to me.

There are rumors that VDOT may soon ban single passenger hybrids from the HOV lanes.

I'm not sure why a hybrid should get any better treatment than a high mileage diesel anyhow. A TDI can do as well or better in the MPG category, especially on the highway.

Brian Elfert
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
belfert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Re: Hybrids vs. Diesel

Originally posted by Begle1
The surveys also showed that owners of about 200 diesel-powered cars are saving 388 gallons of fuel each year even though they drove 22 percent more miles than they had in the past.
This is very true for me. Since my TDI gets such good mileage, I tend to drive more than I would otherwise since my fuel costs are so low.

I would certainly drive far less and still spend more on fuel if my truck was my only vehicle. I often decide it isn't worth doing something if I need to take the truck since it drinks so much fuel compared to my car. The truck is primarily for pulling my RV and it does less of that with the high fuel prices.

Brian Elfert
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.