Notices
General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

New Ford 6.7 numbers leaked...400/725

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2009, 07:19 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
purduepurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeyB
I don't think the HP is going to mean much if the truck gets 10-12mpg like the current 6.4L. Several weeks ago I talked to a local diesel shop and said it's the biggest gripe with the 6.4L customers. They are just happy to spend a bunch of money on a Spartan tune just to get it up to 15-16mpg.

MikeyB
Cant they push 580hp with that spartan tune also(guessing on kill mode)? Factory twins have benefits.
Old 09-11-2009, 08:14 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
levigarrett76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will take a stock 5.9 over a maxxed out v-8. I would rather have a motor that will last 500k+ and get near 20 mpg unloaded. Shoot a 325/610 5.9 will pull way more than needs to be pulled in a 1 ton truck anyway....Give me a 5.9 in a new truck with 250hp 700 tq
Old 09-13-2009, 08:36 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
RollinCoalSmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: H'ville Tx.
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where would the hp/tq numbers be on the big three if there was no epa regulations? Hmmmm it would be an interesting battle of the big 3 if there was a no hold barred hp/tq race.
Old 09-13-2009, 04:42 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
pronstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any info on a tranny that will reliably handle the torque?
Old 09-13-2009, 08:59 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
levigarrett76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RollinCoalSmoke
Where would the hp/tq numbers be on the big three if there was no epa regulations? Hmmmm it would be an interesting battle of the big 3 if there was a no hold barred hp/tq race.

all three would be well over 20 mpg...you can bank on that
Old 09-13-2009, 11:01 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
graphitecumnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by levigarrett76
all three would be well over 20 mpg...you can bank on that
and a Cummins would still have a P7100 on it...
Old 09-14-2009, 12:53 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
levigarrett76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i can only dream
Old 09-15-2009, 10:30 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
72dart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Black Creek, WI.
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I honestly think these power wars are a joke! I would give anything to get my Dodge with a 340HP, and 660Lbs rating. I would want the same engine the Cummins offers the medium duties, like 16 quart sump capacity, 2800 RPM governed limit, Rear gear train, and a Cummins 250K engine warranty ect. I laugh at Ford when I hear they have another answer for a diesel buyer. In my opinion, they are only catering to the performance flunkies! With total disregard to longevity and durability. I thing Ford builds great trucks and would buy one in a second, as long as it was gasoline powered!
Old 09-15-2009, 12:58 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
levigarrett76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good pointlook at the international version of the 6.0.....VT360. Much less hp and revs alot less...how many of them do you hear about having problems. Talked to my ups man yesterday, has that motor and over 550k on it. No problems....ford turned it up too much
Old 09-15-2009, 01:19 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
CoastalDav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 1,425
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd rather have the fuel mileage than all that HP.

The other side of this is Ford must have confidence in its drive train to handle
that much torque. Truck Price just went up.

I could push the button on the Attitude/Juice three times and come up with the torque. Now the 48RE imput shaft and tranny might be hurting if I towed in that position. If I could find a 4:30 ring and pinion for my truck I would not worry about it. No one makes one. Wish I still had my Dana 80.

Dave
Old 09-16-2009, 02:39 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
peobryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Goshen, Ky
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pronstar
Any info on a tranny that will reliably handle the torque?
The transmissions in the 6.4 PowerStroke will support 500+rwhp. On an all stock tranny, that is pretty impressive, no matter what the make.

The new tranny is supposed to be even more stout than this one.
Old 09-17-2009, 06:50 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
RickG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Owensboro KY
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by levigarrett76
good pointlook at the international version of the 6.0.....VT360. Much less hp and revs alot less...how many of them do you hear about having problems. Talked to my ups man yesterday, has that motor and over 550k on it. No problems....ford turned it up too much
That's exactly right . Dodge could have tuned the Cummins in the heavy vehicles to produce more hp but they went for reliability . I read that in a press release when the 4500/5500 first came out .
Old 09-17-2009, 06:56 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
MikeyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tomball, Texas
Posts: 7,543
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yeah, horsepower isn't going to mean much when diesel gets back to over $4 a gallon and the truck is only getting 12mpg on a good day.

MikeyB
Old 09-18-2009, 03:11 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
DBLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MikeyB
Yeah, horsepower isn't going to mean much when diesel gets back to over $4 a gallon and the truck is only getting 12mpg on a good day.

MikeyB
Just heard GMC owner yesterday say his new Duramax 6 speed auto could tow there 25ft travel trailer better then his kids 07 Dodge 5.9 with a 4 speed auto but the Dodge got better fuel mileage
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pulltilbroke
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
17
02-17-2012 12:14 AM
berok
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
90
12-23-2007 10:14 PM
Copenhagenjunkie
General Diesel Discussion
2
02-16-2005 11:12 AM
Rattletrap1
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
7
12-06-2004 09:31 PM



Quick Reply: New Ford 6.7 numbers leaked...400/725



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.