General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Explain this to me please....

Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:50 AM
  #1  
Teddy Bear's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster, Ky
Explain this to me please....

Ive been wondering about this for a while now and i just cant figure it out. How is 35 pounds of boost from... say a phat shaft 64 different than 35 pounds of boost from a stock hx35?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 04:11 AM
  #2  
desertram800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Ojai/Port Hueneme, CA
probably faster spool-up, the phat shaft probably has ball bearings so it'll last longer and not get so hot?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #3  
getblown5.9's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
number here are theoretical, not fact

well due to the larger size from a phat shaft 35psi might mean 1000cfm
whereas 35psi from a stock hx35 is prolly only 600cfm.

this is why if you run a stock turbo and are spinning it to 40psi, you may have 350hp and EGT's can hit 1600+, but switch it out for a larger turbo, and you will make closer to 400hp, at only 35psi, with EGT's down around 1400.

its not the boost we are looking for, its the volume of air we can shove into the cylinder for a more complete burn, boost is only the measure of restriction.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 09:43 AM
  #4  
dodgezilla04's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
From: kingston,wa
....and the phat shafts are not ball bearing turbos.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
A hx35 is most efficient around 20 psi and a 64 near 32 psi so the 64 would be producing cooler air.

--Or at least this is how I understand it

*Waiting to get slam dunked by a local turbo guru*
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
magram's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: LETHBRIDGE
where's the sugar??
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
I ain't giving you no sugar!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #8  
jkitterman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
You also can have two different turbos producing 35 psi at 600 cfm but one will be doing it more efficiently by doing it with less temperature rise, like 350 vs 425 degrees.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #9  
Lil Dog's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 2
From: Red Deer, Alberta Canada
Now we're splittin hairs.. Efficiency is a tough one to put a number to.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 08:54 PM
  #10  
Duallydog's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
From: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
I gotta see where this is going.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #11  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
Originally Posted by Lil Dog
Now we're splittin hairs.. Efficiency is a tough one to put a number to.
You're right- thats why they make maps to show levels off effeciency at different levels of boost and different volumes of air =P
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #12  
johnny5.9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 4
From: Buffalo, NY
There are also differences in drive pressure from one turbo to another. For optimal efficiency you want your turbo to produce more boost pressure than the pressure required to spin it. When a turbo is overdriven the charge air becomes very hot and the turbo produces lots of backpressure reducing the performance you're supposed to be achieving
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #13  
Lil Dog's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 2
From: Red Deer, Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by Ph4tty
You're right- thats why they make maps to show levels off effeciency at different levels of boost and different volumes of air =P
Well you have to account for loss even with a good performance map. The best measurement would be to accurately account for the temperature and pressure rise across the compressor vs. theoretical. Most maps are just theoretical so you might have to fudge the numbers by up to 10%.. The same goes for the turbine side, pressure and temperature drop vs output speed.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #14  
TxDiesel007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 2
From: Laredo
Originally Posted by Ph4tty
A hx35 is most efficient around 20 psi and a 64 near 32 psi so the 64 would be producing cooler air.

--Or at least this is how I understand it

*Waiting to get slam dunked by a local turbo guru*
This is th way i see it....

Cooler EGTS outta the Phat shaft and efficiency is all that it is...

Rick
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #15  
LUKE-MM-PULLER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Sheldon, Iowa
Originally Posted by Teddy Bear
Ive been wondering about this for a while now and i just cant figure it out. How is 35 pounds of boost from... say a phat shaft 64 different than 35 pounds of boost from a stock hx35?
Boost is how many punds of restriction you have. Your intake valves will only flow so much each time they open per pound of boost. So 35 psi is 35 psi no matter how you look at it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dcwm
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
10
Aug 21, 2003 10:03 AM
dcwm
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
28
May 14, 2003 02:42 PM
RJMontana
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
5
Mar 21, 2003 11:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.