Competition / Pulls / OffRoad You wanted it, well you got it. The competition and pulling forum. Please have your racing, pulling and other competition posts here. No East Coast vs. West Coast, and no flame wars!

8.3 vers 5.9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008, 09:39 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stock600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: terrell,texas
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 8.3 vers 5.9?

Hey guys, scrounging around still for a 94-98 12v. Lots of 8.3 out there in the yards ive gone through, the guy running the place said the 2 engines have the same bolt patern on the bellhousing? This gets the wheel to rolling, if this is so why doesnt anyone run the bigger brother cummins? Sure its heavier but should make much diff. exp. to you pullers that hang wieght way out front. Just sooo many CID. About 500 rather than 360. Just saying if all the same things were done to a 8.3 that we do to a 5.9 wouldnt ot re-open a whole can of worms???? Any thoughts guys

Ps. it only looks slightly larger on the outside diamitions, maybe no wider, prob, slightly longer.............
Old 02-12-2008, 11:42 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
jrs_dodge_diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 4,569
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Heres the dimensions I got from our generator at work:

Length 42" (timing case to bellhousing)
Width-27" (timing case was widest point)
Height-36" (valve cover to bottom of oil pan)

From Cummins.com on the QSC brochure:

L-44"
W-31"
H-42"

With a wet weight (with oil) of 1,594 lbs . The B wieghs approx 1100 lbs.

Looks like the dimesions will vary slightly based on oil pan style, timing case, accesories, etc.

Knowing how much power can be had from a 12V P-pump B series, I am sure that the same could be had from a C series.

https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/...d.php?t=138950
Old 02-12-2008, 12:08 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
CNeubauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fairfield, Ia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just don't think there are the performance upgrades available for the 8.3 that there are for the 5.9 and I know in medium duty applications the 8.3 doesn't like to spin very fast so I don't know if it would hold up in a high performance situation. An IH DT-466 would be a much better option in my mind since it pretty much set the standard for diesel performance over the past 30 years.
Old 02-13-2008, 05:04 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jughead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: tennessee
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i happen to have the 2 engines sitting together. the 5.9 looks like a toy.
Old 02-13-2008, 09:46 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
kruegerlouie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: mankato,mn
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thought about putting it in a 2nd gen for pulling but as soon as someone made you open the hood youd be kicked out. most would knotice the injectors on the opposite side of the head.
Old 02-15-2008, 01:59 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stock600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: terrell,texas
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was just a fun thought, after hearing that the bellhousings were the same. Are you pullers set to a CID limit? If so dont see how the fords would be in the same class. There about 445ci i believe to our little but mighty 360! I think the 8.3 would be right at 500ci or so.... ya because the viper is 8.3 and i believe thier 505ci, later Ryan
Old 02-15-2008, 02:39 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
jrs_dodge_diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 4,569
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by kruegerlouie
thought about putting it in a 2nd gen for pulling but as soon as someone made you open the hood youd be kicked out. most would knotice the injectors on the opposite side of the head.
All of the 8.3L C series engines I have seen have the injectors on the left (intake) side of the head. These are engines equipped with a P-pump. Don't think I have ever seen a 24V 8.3, but I would assume that the injector is in the middle (dead center) of the head.
Old 02-15-2008, 04:12 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stock600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: terrell,texas
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got to admit it sounds like a great idea, the great efficent design of the ol cummins but another 140 inches to play with. Wonder if its the same p-pump just set up with larger internals to flow a bit more fuel? Not sure either if a 24v was made but i know where one is in a large truck and it will flat run in stock form. 3-4 inches longer little wider and what 400-450 lbs heavier, sounds perfect for a pulling truck. Or a drag project with it set back 6-8 inches??
Old 02-15-2008, 09:38 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
DiezelPowa12v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In sledpulling the engine must be from a 1-ton or lighter production vehicle. So it wouldn't work.
Old 02-15-2008, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
BigB82789's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd take a 5.9 for racing, but a bombed 8.3 might make an interesting puller.
Old 02-15-2008, 09:52 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
manureman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had 2 Case MX270 tractors and they both had 24V ISC Cummins in them. They were a little bit different because they used a Cummins CAPS pump, which is not a true rotary or inline pump. They were really great engines and had a TON of torque. TST made a power module for them, but I never had one. Didn't need it. These things would make 300 PTO horsepower all day long and around `1500 ft/lbs of torque. They also wouldn't 'lug' down like a conventional mechanically governed engine. The ECU would just keep fueling these things and let them pull down to about 1750 rpm and hold it there no matter what you did to shift it. I tried to lug one down once and at about 1680 a bunch of alarms went off and the tractor shut down.
Old 02-16-2008, 03:23 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
lobes1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gansevoort,NY
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TST Power Kits can be used on any Cummins 6BT5.9 or 6CT8.3 series engine equipped with the Bosch P7100 style fuel pump. On-highway kits are available to 230 horsepower and 605 lb.-ft for the 6BT; and 325 horsepower and 920 lb.-ft for the C8.3. For the C8.3, off-highway competition kits are available with up to 450 horsepower and 1000 lb.-ft for the 6BT; and 525 horsepower and 1800 lb.-ft. for the C8.3.


This is from TST website. Those are some nice torque numbers for the C
Old 02-16-2008, 03:50 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
dropped2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harker Heights,Tx
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont think a ram could handle that much torque!
Old 02-17-2008, 01:09 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
stock600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: terrell,texas
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure it could, if not my little 1/2 chevy with the Now fully boxed frame could!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MMpuller
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
41
02-03-2010 12:28 AM



Quick Reply: 8.3 vers 5.9?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.