Big Rigs Talk about other Cummins powered vehicles here. As a matter of fact, it doesn't even have to be Cummins, but it will be diesel! :)

N-14 celect Horrible fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #1  
Lizzy Boucher's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
N-14 celect Horrible fuel economy

I have a 94 cabover with an N 14 cummins celect. i have 46, 000 lbs rear ebds with a 4:11 gear ratio. I haul a tri axel cattle pot. I'm lucky to see 5 mpg and am usually only getting 4-4.5. Is the gear ratio what's causing my poor fuel economy or could it be something else???
Thanks for your help!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 05:03 PM
  #2  
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 3
What is it rated at for power/torque, how many miles on it?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
Dieselbuilder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 748
Likes: 7
From: Nanoose Bay B.C. Canada
Is you trans direct or overdrive
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #4  
Lizzy Boucher's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
What is it rated at for power/torque, how many miles on it?
It's a 13 speed, 460 hp and 500,000 on a rebuild
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 06:15 PM
  #5  
Lizzy Boucher's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dieselbuilder
Is you trans direct or overdrive
Overdrive
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #6  
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 3
I believe your fuel economy is normal for that power/ gear ratio and the fact that you haul a triaxle trailer loaded with livestock. ULSD also plays a roll in lower fuel economy. Has the truck historically gotten the fuel economy or have you noticed a recent drop?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
Lizzy Boucher's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
I believe your fuel economy is normal for that power/ gear ratio and the fact that you haul a triaxle trailer loaded with livestock. ULSD also plays a roll in lower fuel economy. Has the truck historically gotten the fuel economy or have you noticed a recent drop?
we just bought the truck a few months ago. The guy before us said he was getting a constant 6mpg but it sounds like that was probably not the truth. Thanks for your help!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #8  
Dieselbuilder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 748
Likes: 7
From: Nanoose Bay B.C. Canada
You want it to get 6mpg drive at 55 slow down!!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 09:53 PM
  #9  
NE frmhnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 2
From: McCook, Nebraska
If you run it like the typical bull hauler, you're not going to get any fuel mileage. You're not going to get that great of fuel mileage with a cabover, especially a flattop with no fairings, hauling that much weight anyhow.

The previous owner may have done 6 mpg, but if he was he sure wasn't making time and hauling heavy.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #10  
tankeryanker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Creek Oregon
Hauling 105,500 lbs 4 axle tanker truck pulling a 4 axle tanker trailer all hwy use 6 mpg
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2012 | 01:16 AM
  #11  
NE frmhnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 2
From: McCook, Nebraska
You didn't run it like the typical bull hauler did you?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 07:21 AM
  #12  
chaikwa's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 2
From: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Originally Posted by Dieselbuilder
You want it to get 6mpg drive at 55 slow down!!
Originally Posted by scot pa
If you run it like the typical bull hauler, you're not going to get any fuel mileage.
Originally Posted by scot pa
You didn't run it like the typical bull hauler did you?
Real nice guys. Usually it's ME that gets accused of being abrasive and arrogant. Now you've probably scared the poor lady off.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 11:05 AM
  #13  
NE frmhnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 2
From: McCook, Nebraska
Didn't mean to, but yeah, especially with that gearing, you're just not going to get that great of fuel mileage. Might be worth it to swap in some 3.70s or 3.55s.

Tankeryanker's tanks are a bit more aerodynamic that a bull rack as well.

Does the truck have a condo or roof fairings? They add some weight but are worth having. I ran a mid-roof 9400 for a couple years, I could make it from Erie to Wytheville in a half hour less time and get 1/4 MPG better fuel mileage while pulling a Thermoking reefer versus a drybox, all other things being equal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NE frmhnd
Big Rigs
9
Oct 11, 2012 11:05 PM
haksauto
General Diesel Discussion
2
Oct 11, 2010 01:47 PM
DieselTom
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
13
Apr 19, 2005 06:31 PM
quantrill88
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
9
Feb 6, 2004 11:30 AM
MARKY MARK
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
18
Feb 16, 2003 01:31 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.