3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

2008 2500 lug nut torque spec's 145ft lbs?

Old Apr 8, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #1  
2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
2008 2500 lug nut torque spec's 145ft lbs?

Just mounted a set of 17in polished aluminum wheels from a 2008 2500 on my 97 CTD 2500.

having trouble verifying correct lug nut torque spec's. got em torqued down to 145ft lbs. is this correct?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #2  
ratlratl's Avatar
MMMmmmm.... Grits!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 11
From: HEART OF, NC
I do 145 to my dually steel wheels. Service manual says 140 for SRW and 145 for DRW.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
snoyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
I've had this debate as well, little worried about putting that much torque onto aluminum wheels. Haven't figures out the right answer, so still using the 140 for my truck, but wondering if we have a wheel expert on the website that could chime in on whether we risk damaging the aluminum with the torque we are setting?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #4  
ratlratl's Avatar
MMMmmmm.... Grits!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 11
From: HEART OF, NC
The alloys have steel inserts that are installed onto hot wheels, then seized to when it cools. If anything the wheel would let loose first and the lugs and inserts would still be there.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #5  
2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
that's my exact worry... have always torqued down alloy wheels to less than steel wheels.

if steel insert in factory alloy wheels is true, then 140 may not be out of line.

Originally Posted by snoyes
I've had this debate as well, little worried about putting that much torque onto aluminum wheels. Haven't figures out the right answer, so still using the 140 for my truck, but wondering if we have a wheel expert on the website that could chime in on whether we risk damaging the aluminum with the torque we are setting?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #6  
Jason Foster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Iowa unfortunately
I've run aluminum wheels for years and torque them only to 105. Never had a problem. Most rims will tell you how much torque to put on them on the inside.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 02:02 AM
  #7  
2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
will be yanking one wheel back off to check for markings and put a strong magnet on wheel area to verify steel inserts.

soooo... is it official, 140 ft lbs for 2008 2500 w/factory alloy wheels?
only have factory manual for 97 CTD, so can't look up spec's.

Originally Posted by Jason Foster
I've run aluminum wheels for years and torque them only to 105. Never had a problem. Most rims will tell you how much torque to put on them on the inside.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 06:41 AM
  #8  
Guardrail's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Bonner Springs, KS
I always use my calibrated elbow until they are tight. I wonder how people have survived this long without the torque wrench?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 07:18 AM
  #9  
ratlratl's Avatar
MMMmmmm.... Grits!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 11
From: HEART OF, NC
Yes, I pulled the specs from the service manual.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #10  
Special Blend's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: SK, Canada
I only have been torqing my 20's to 105 ft/lbs as well as the stockers when I put them back on last winter. I double check every month and they all were still tight. No problems to report. I would never torque alloy wheels to 145ft/lbs. I could see the steel wheels but not anything alloy.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #11  
2500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
does the 2008 factory spec's for 2500 SWD at 140 ft lbs, make any distinction for steel wheel vs alloy?

Originally Posted by ratlratl
Yes, I pulled the specs from the service manual.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 01:57 PM
  #12  
D45's Avatar
D45
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
My H2s are torqued down to 135.........
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #13  
ratlratl's Avatar
MMMmmmm.... Grits!!
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 11
From: HEART OF, NC
Just DRW or SRW. If I am correct on the steel insert part then we should be good.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #14  
u2cheyenne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
torque rating

I cant remember for sure, but I know that the torque rating on all 2500 and 3500 Dodges is either 140 or 145. I work at Les Schwab in Portland, and I know the first time that I did it, I thought it seemed a little strong but its about the norm for all 3/4 and 1 ton trucks. Have a good one

Mikey
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wisconative
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
1
May 13, 2013 07:20 AM
Firstgenfanatic
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
11
May 14, 2008 06:17 PM
CanuckCTD
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
5
Jul 9, 2007 05:58 AM
Mopar Kid
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
2
Mar 29, 2007 07:22 AM
1stGenBikeHauler
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Jan 25, 2003 12:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.