3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

Smarty Hot Beta tests

Old May 1, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #121  
Sloverado's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
I put a pressure box on mine today. Didn't set any codes and I will be dynoing it this weekend.
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #122  
tcr's Avatar
tcr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Wow, Even level one is BAD @#*!! So much stronger than the previous versions. I've tried it w/ Quad on 60hp, and on the higher levels it is AWESOME! I'm kinda scared to go much further.
Marco,
Is there any chance this will be available in different TM versions??? How about a speed limiter removal?
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #123  
dodgezilla04's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
From: kingston,wa
uh, i stacked the quad with mine on level 9, only went to the first 60hp setting and i just wet myself. so be careful. i did NOT hear any timing rattle when stacking, but was worried about pressure.
this thing just gets better
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #124  
gus's 03's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
From: pacific north wet
MARCO: pleas dont change it!

i tested it with cruse control tonight, up and down holls @ 60, 65, 70, 75 and was perfectly manered no surging.
steady speed 75mph level ground, 6psi 600*. fuel economy is looking promising if i can keep my foot out of it.

my take on the throttle sensitivity. its not bad enough to keep me from using as a dayly driver. i just have to stay a little more alert in rush hour grid lock. im willing to pay to play. and i think it might be enough to scare the he!! out of some one who realy shuldnt be running it. and with the low end that it has im sure this will destroy an non built auto instantly, and from my experiance, thats what 90% of the yuppie kids that have one drive.

heck this versions wild enough, id say that you almost ought to intentionaly make it leave traces in the ecm so people dont try to blame it on dodge and warrenty parts because of it! but thats just my 2.cents.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #125  
tcr's Avatar
tcr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
"its not bad enough to keep me from using as a dayly driver. i just have to stay a little more alert in rush hour grid lock."
Hey Gus, no offence intended, but this isn't the brightest idea I've heard in awhile. Obviously you don't drive in a city full of idiots like I do. You want a daily driving program that you have to stay more alert to drive??? When it's probably possible to smooth out the fueling and acheive the same HP and pull just as hard? I think options will change when the majority gets to use this program, especially the auto guys.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #126  
Marco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Italy
gus's 03 & tcr,

this is as close as it can get to a perfect example!

Each one tells me the exact opposite of the other!
You won't believe how many times that happens! What works for one guy does not for the next...

WHOM of you two do I listen to?
LOL... To be or not to be....

I guess the one size fits all tool simply does not exist.

Marco
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #127  
RyeThomas's Avatar
Winner winner chicken dinner!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 11
From: Northern VA
You cant please everyone thats for sure. I like the program the way it is and think its far more driveable then say a Bullydog with Torque Management delete.
Im using it as my everyday program, and I dont see any issues with it. But again thats just me.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #128  
morkable's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 1
From: Fort McMurray, Alberta
I think that if the new software is too wild for someone they can go to one of the milder tq management softwares. Hence all the options

Kevin
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #129  
tcr's Avatar
tcr
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by morkable
I think that if the new software is too wild for someone they can go to one of the milder tq management softwares. Hence all the options

Kevin
EXACTLY, if a Mod TM HOT version will be available, that would be my perfect world. Will this be the case? Or will it be like the Wild and only have 1 TM option.

Marco, Don't listen to me, just listen to the majority once it hits the public. Fair enough?
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #130  
JThiessen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Edmonds WA
Originally Posted by tcr
"its not bad enough to keep me from using as a dayly driver. i just have to stay a little more alert in rush hour grid lock."
Hey Gus, no offence intended, but this isn't the brightest idea I've heard in awhile. Obviously you don't drive in a city full of idiots like I do. You want a daily driving program that you have to stay more alert to drive??? When it's probably possible to smooth out the fueling and acheive the same HP and pull just as hard? I think options will change when the majority gets to use this program, especially the auto guys.
Well, based on TCR's zip code - he in fact does drive in a city full of idiots! But then, I bet if Marco asked, everyone drives with idiots.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #131  
dodgezilla04's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
From: kingston,wa
ooooh, careful, calling all those folks in austin idiots? that may cause a riot here. being just across the ferry J, you see your share on 99, and I5
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #132  
JThiessen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Edmonds WA
Originally Posted by dodgezilla04
ooooh, careful, calling all those folks in austin idiots? that may cause a riot here. being just across the ferry J, you see your share on 99, and I5
Yeah, it was tongue in cheek though! BUT...I meant Gus's 03 (sorry TCR - I do know those on-ramps you guys have down there scare the pants off me...........you got about 50 yards to merge into 80mph traffic in a lot of spots!).
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #133  
gus's 03's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
From: pacific north wet
yep i5 between everett and seattle, been in the top 10 worst trafic in the nation for over a decade...
and ill prob get my self killed for the next coment..... i have to merge onto the boeing freeway, and thoes are the worst of the idiots!

as far as the throtle response/tq managment... im going to stick to my guns. i say keep it this way, atleast for any " hot " versions.

marco has stated this is the basis on wich future software will come from. ie: milder versions etc. im sure there will be versions to apease the mas public. i guess " stay alert" want the right wording... i guess what i shulda said is " in trafic i just need to drive like my wife is with me" does that get the point across better. its controlable, i have had no problem so far in the 6+ hours of stop and go gridlock that ive seen this week, i about crushed a rice rocket, but thats no fault of the smarty.. (he prob wont drive at night w/ his headlights off, and sit in a blind spot next to a lifted truck)
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #134  
Morse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
I ran a 13.35 in an 06 2wd 2500 at the NHRDA meet at Moroso this past weekend with the new 60 hp program. I'll turn it up at the track as soon as I take care of some traction issues.. It has a PS62-14 and Dynomite Diesel 90 hp injectors.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #135  
Morse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
On the dyno mine showed just over 3900 rpm..
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.