3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

new turbo,lotta smoke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2010, 02:48 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Mike Fleming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new turbo,lotta smoke

Hey everybody,just installed a silver 62 on my 04.5 and it smokes like a train.It only does so prior to the turbo spooling,is this just the nature of the beast or can I do something to help?I am runing a smarty,airdog 165,50 horse nozzles and a Goerend low stall convertor in a built tranny.
Old 07-25-2010, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Tight Converter and a Slower Spooling Turbo is going to exhibit those symptoms. Try a looser converter, or faster spooling turbo. Also check for boost leaks, and change you Smarty Settings. I suggest running Torque Management on "1".
Old 07-25-2010, 03:07 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Mike Fleming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanx JTaylor I was thinking the tight conv. was partially to blame.I have been running on torque mang 4 so I will try #1,Thanx again.
Old 07-26-2010, 01:22 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Nsomniac05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jacksonville NC
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was dissapointed when I installed my silver 62. It is advertised as the best compromise btw towing, power, and economy. I think it missed the mark. I would hate to think I put it on a mostly stock 5.9 expecting all those qualities. Wish I knew I would be going with twins back then. The silver 62 is definately not suitable for a secondary.
Old 07-26-2010, 01:48 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
COUNTRYBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nsomniac05
I was dissapointed when I installed my silver 62. It is advertised as the best compromise btw towing, power, and economy. I think it missed the mark. I would hate to think I put it on a mostly stock 5.9 expecting all those qualities. Wish I knew I would be going with twins back then. The silver 62 is definately not suitable for a secondary.
Yeah, the HTB series turbos are probably more suited for a single turbo decent spooling upgrade. Thank god I have a 6 speed! I'm not tired of my upgrades, but sometimes wished I could back mine off, but don't dare ecspecially at 6,000 feet in elevation...
Old 07-26-2010, 04:40 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Dodgezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 8,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try giving it a bit more fuel either by adjusting your Smarty settings or by stacking something with it. Stacking will usually net you a bit more fuel off the line to spool that turbo....
Old 07-26-2010, 08:19 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
mainiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: portland, maine
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i find many people on these forums miss the mark when setting up thier trucks. there are many factors mentioned above that affect spooling characteristics. Its not that the silver 62 is difficult to spool, the rest of your setup isn't spool fiendly. trq management on 4 is alot of fuel and may put the fire out. a tight converter is definately the major player when lighting a turbo and your silver 62 should not have been recommended with that setup if instant spooling was desired. I disagree with adding more fueling to your setup to light that charger. if your looking for a high hp setup with not so laggy spooling, look at converter upgrade. i spool a 66/14/71 with stock sticks and just a smarty with no problem and minimal smoke. Its very important to pick your tranny setup with a turbo in mind. its too bad you didn't recieve these recommendations earlier.
good luck with the upgrades
Old 07-26-2010, 01:04 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
JJPage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spokane Valley / Thompson Falls, MT.
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nsomniac05
I was dissapointed when I installed my silver 62. It is advertised as the best compromise btw towing, power, and economy. I think it missed the mark. I would hate to think I put it on a mostly stock 5.9 expecting all those qualities. Wish I knew I would be going with twins back then. The silver 62 is definately not suitable for a secondary.
This is absolutely correct.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sleeperman
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (6.7L Only)
1
03-08-2011 02:56 PM
captntim
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
10
12-26-2008 02:53 PM
carterw65
Towing and Hauling / RV
6
04-18-2007 09:05 AM
jbs007
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
07-08-2003 01:29 AM
97CTD
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
4
03-17-2003 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: new turbo,lotta smoke



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.