3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Why HO instead of just turbo???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2003, 10:27 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dansdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, Ca.
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why HO instead of just turbo???

I just bought my trailer..'97 Wilderness 26'T and was wondering why HO is so much better than a Turbo?? Whats the mileage and longevity, I'm only pulling 5000 dry. Thanks for any help...Dave ??? ??? ??? ???
Old 01-07-2003, 10:47 PM
  #2  
Chapter President
 
Lil Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Red Deer, Alberta Canada
Posts: 6,102
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re:Why HO instead of just turbo???

Welcome aboard!!!! 8) 8)<br><br>To make it a short answer, the Cummins Diesel engine is offered in 2 different power outputs for consumers. The first standard issue is coupled to the Automatic transmission and is rated for 250 HP. The HO or Hi Output Cummins is mated with the manual 6 speed and soon to be released heavy duty Automatic and produces 305 HP.<br><br>The HO is just the designation for the engine rating..<br><br>Now go and test drive one!!! <br><br>J-eh<br>
Old 01-08-2003, 02:22 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
misterKTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Colton, OR
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Why HO instead of just turbo???

To add to that just a bit....they are both turbo charged engines.
Old 01-08-2003, 02:59 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Push Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Drive till ya hit a Polar Bear, then go back 50 miles
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Why HO instead of just turbo???

Dave,<br><br>As Lil' Dog stated, the standard output (SO - 245 HP) is mated to the auto and the 5 speed equipped trucks, the High Output (HO - 305 HP) is mated to the 6 speed. From the few trucks I've seen so far (5 or 6) the SO appears to get 1 - 2 mpg better fuel economy (up here in the frozen north anyway). However the HO does have one thing that I think is awful nice: Oil injection into the skirt of the piston for cooling. I think in the long run, the HO will likely be the better engine for turning up the power (if that sort of thing flicks your bic).<br><br>Rod
Old 01-10-2003, 08:10 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
FireNhole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So. Ct. US of A
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Why HO instead of just turbo???

FYI Gm has used oil sprayed pistons since 1997 in their 6.5 l diesels.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sgrooms
Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices
21
04-08-2008 11:17 AM
dodgezilla04
Other
25
10-10-2005 12:09 PM
HOHN
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
45
10-08-2005 08:51 AM
pwrtripls1
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
12
08-04-2005 03:08 AM



Quick Reply: Why HO instead of just turbo???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.