3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

New 6.7- 350hp and 650tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 10:26 PM
  #76  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by 46mech
I too saw the numbers listed on the Cummins site for the ISB and was hoping that 750ftlbs would be DC's trump on the other trucks.

BUT..... my question is..... who has some good pics? I know over on TDR there are just a few, but I was hoping someone has some better pics, or more of 'em. I'm not quite sure if like the '07 tail lights. I like the tail lights on my Durango, but I don't know if I'm game for having the same style on a RAM.
Of course the numbers Cummins publishes are not for the Dodge application, those numbers are always published by Dodge and are always different than what Cummins has for other applications.

There are two pictures on the media site, I'll try posting one to my gallery for you, it's very high res and large though.

Ok, had to shrink it to 50% height and width but assuming it's approved it should be there soon. It's a side shot of a 3500 QC Cummins in Silver.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #77  
46mech's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Canton, So. Dakota
Thanks for posting the pic, Berak. From that view the tail lights look the same as any other 3rd gen. truck.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #78  
hammerjammer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MikeyB
I agree, everyone take a deep breath.

Don't understand either why DC would offer two different 6spd auto behind the CTD. But there must be a motive. Could be price, the Aisin 6spd is a $2200 option where as the 68re could be $1000?? Kind of like why did DC offer 5spd manual and a 6spd manual at the same time. The 6spd could have been used on all CTDs.

Just think, we will have a 6spd manual and a 6spd auto, great win for the consumer.

MikeyB
The logical reason for having two 6sp auto's,different applications,the dodge ctd, commercial trucks,would get the aisin tranny,a proven commercial unit,with warranty up to 300K miles in medium duty trucks. The 68re would be a better fit for the non-commercial units,you know, the jack-um up,big tires,big chip,cruise up and down the street crowd or towing the 5iver a few times yearly,hauling the boat,the ATV's,the harleys ,etc.I guess the information will all be public in due time.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #79  
rokspydr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: warren NJ
Are we sure the two trans' are different? how do we know the trans in the pickup is not the asin with a different name for whatever reason?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #80  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by rokspydr
Are we sure the two trans' are different? how do we know the trans in the pickup is not the asin with a different name for whatever reason?


Do the same transmissions often have completely different gear ratios? Is that something that's easy to change? Are the guys who've posted on this website and several others who have first hand knowledge of the 68RE being produced here in the U.S. lying? If they were the same wouldn't DC refer to them in a simular manner rather than Aisin AS68RC vs. 68RE Orion? Isn't the 68RE nomenclature consistent with the Mopar designations for in house automatics built by Mopar for the last half a century? Doesn't all of this evidence point to the fact that the 68RE exists and is not the Aisin regardless how little sense it seems to make to someone out here?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 10:20 PM
  #81  
lmills's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
From: swinging wrenches in MD
Originally Posted by Berak


Do the same transmissions often have completely different gear ratios? Is that something that's easy to change? Are the guys who've posted on this website and several others who have first hand knowledge of the 68RE being produced here in the U.S. lying? If they were the same wouldn't DC refer to them in a simular manner rather than Aisin AS68RC vs. 68RE Orion? Isn't the 68RE nomenclature consistent with the Mopar designations for in house automatics built by Mopar for the last half a century? Doesn't all of this evidence point to the fact that the 68RE exists and is not the Aisin regardless how little sense it seems to make to someone out here?
are you tring to say there are two different auto's!?!?!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 02:10 AM
  #82  
billindenver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Berak


Do the same transmissions often have completely different gear ratios? Is that something that's easy to change? Are the guys who've posted on this website and several others who have first hand knowledge of the 68RE being produced here in the U.S. lying? If they were the same wouldn't DC refer to them in a simular manner rather than Aisin AS68RC vs. 68RE Orion? Isn't the 68RE nomenclature consistent with the Mopar designations for in house automatics built by Mopar for the last half a century? Doesn't all of this evidence point to the fact that the 68RE exists and is not the Aisin regardless how little sense it seems to make to someone out here?
Brother, you are taking all of this entirely to personally. If someone disagrees with you then they are calling you a liar, or they are lying or they're plotting to subvert your online image through highly complex and evil underhanded tactics. edit Sit back, drink a cold one..wait till January and say I TOLD YOU SO! There really is no need to be play the victim just because someone disagrees with you.

Bill

Last edited by wannadiesel; Sep 5, 2006 at 02:32 PM. Reason: political
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 02:48 AM
  #83  
streetsmoker's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo, MS
Try this out for a brain teaser. The AW4/5 that Diamler/Jeep uses are Aisans renamed something else, and are designated A400/A500's in Toyota vehicles.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #84  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by billindenver
Brother, you are taking all of this entirely to personally. If someone disagrees with you then they are calling you a liar, or they are lying or they're plotting to subvert your online image through highly complex and evil underhanded tactics. You wouldn't be related to GWB now would ya? Not everyone who disagrees with you is a terrorist supporting anti american. Sit back, drink a cold one..wait till January and say I TOLD YOU SO! There really is no need to be play the victim just because someone disagrees with you.

Bill
As I've already said, I take none of this personally. I find it amusing actually. The simple fact is that no one can be disagreeing with me because it's not my information it's from DC. I didn't create it, it's official DC info. Wait until January for what? THIS IS THE OFFICIAL RELEASE INFORMATION. I am not upset one iota, I am laughing at people's ability to ignore simple facts when presented that do not support their own logic. I could care less if the Aisin was the 68RE, in fact I wish it was, as I think the Aisin will be the beefier unit. The information published by DC however indicates, WITHOUT ANY REASON TO DOUBT IT, it is not.

If anyone would like, I'd be glad to offer you 10 to 1 odds on any bet up to $100 that the 68RE is not the Aisin. Money will be donated to DTR. You offer $100 and I'll offer $1000.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #85  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by streetsmoker
Try this out for a brain teaser. The AW4/5 that Diamler/Jeep uses are Aisans renamed something else, and are designated A400/A500's in Toyota vehicles.

Yeah that's quite the brain teaser. The AW4 transmission looks to me like it was referred to as the .... wait for it .... AW4 transmission by Jeep. AW standing for Aisin Warner, and most likely 4 meaning 4 speed. Just like the Aisin being used by the Cab and Chassis is being called the AS68RC transmission.

Notice how these transmissions all start with a letter indicating the outsourced manufacturer's name? Notice how the 68RE starts with a number? Thanks for supporting my position.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #86  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by lmills
are you tring to say there are two different auto's!?!?!
No, DC is. You have a more reliable source?

It's interesting that over on the TDR forum, no one even suggests that they might be the same transmission. They might not understand or agree with the decision, but no one that I've seen believes otherwise.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #87  
tcb's Avatar
tcb
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: alabama
i just can't stand it. this is just to good. notice how they both have the number 68 and an R. thanks for supporting my position.
tim
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #88  
lmills's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
From: swinging wrenches in MD
Originally Posted by Berak
No, DC is. You have a more reliable source?
Nope, just stirring the pot as usual. LOL
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #89  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Originally Posted by tcb
i just can't stand it. this is just to good. notice how they both have the number 68 and an R. thanks for supporting my position.
tim
Yeah, they are both 6 speeds, so they have a 6. Are you familiar with the Dodge naming convention?

Why don't you take me up on my offer to donate to DTR? I mean if you aren't at least 1/10th as sure as I am about your position, you probably shouldn't bother replying to this thread.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #90  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Did all of you doubters read this thread on this site that I started back in April?

Here are two quotes from two others who posted in that thread:

Originally Posted by BRayls
nope the 68 was designed by dodge for dodge. to be built in dc's ITP 1 plant. they will not be online soon enough for the chassis cabs. they go online in oct. I am told that the build starts with 200 units daily ramping up fast from there to jan 1 and the line should be building all they need. I know we worried because with the 48 dropping we would have many guy/gals on the streets, which was not to be the case we have new product to build. just up the highway a few more miles to the newer plant. still one newer plant ,thats ITP 2 plant that builds the rear drive hemi powered magnums and 300's trannys which is german engineered.
and then a bit later

Originally Posted by powerchokeater
I too will confirm the new 68re, I am at ITP1 (68re build plant) and have been working on tooling for the new launch. This is going to be a good one from what I can see. Bigger shafts should be a plus. I have not had a chance to check the bolt patterns to see if it may bolt up to a 3rd gen, but I will check that soon.
You are ignoring the facts from DC and you basically are calling the gentlemen liars, not me.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.