3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

How tough are the AAM axles?

Old May 18, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #16  
XLR8R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 3
From: Pattonville, Texas
Sure - larger axle tubes, larger ring gear, larger axles, larger pinion... even the diff cover is thicker IIRC!

Anyone happen to know the difference in spline count, metallurgy, etc.?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #17  
bob4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by XLR8R
Really?

The AAMs are physically so much larger than the Danas... seems as though the newer axle tubes/differential housings would be concomitantly stronger.
The wall thickness on the front tubes are a joke.I have also had to replace the left side shafts and a joint on the rt at VERY low miles.The rear has not been an issue.

Bob
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #18  
bob4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mule3010
The only way a dana could be stonger is if they use far superior metals.(they don't) the sheer increase in mass in the 11.5 AAM over the dana along with it's higher rating would all indicate that it would hold more.
Joe
I was speaking about the front not the rear.

Bob
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #19  
XLR8R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 3
From: Pattonville, Texas
Anybody else experienced Bob's problem?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #20  
wreedCTD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
From: cypress/houston, tx
Originally Posted by XLR8R
Sure - larger axle tubes, larger ring gear, larger axles, larger pinion... even the diff cover is thicker IIRC!

Anyone happen to know the difference in spline count, metallurgy, etc.?
are you speaking of the AAM or the Dana?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #21  
mrblond's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
I haven't but a 60 is pretty tuff, enough to use as a rear axle on 3/4 ton vans and pickups in the 70's but the stock D60 bearing and axle shaft set up is not very good.

Curry fixed that with improved Timkin self contained tappered roller bearing assemblys pressed on to 35 spline axles.

I hear from one of my axle guys of defective/bent housings coming that way from the factory but i thought he was exaggerating.

My other axle guy says the AAM's are rock solid.

Both custom axle builders build off road racing axles for a living!

This could be a case of someone thinking they bent the housing but got stuck with a reject instead? I prefer to think this is the case?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #22  
XLR8R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 3
From: Pattonville, Texas
Originally Posted by wreedCTD
are you speaking of the AAM or the Dana?
The differences between them.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #23  
wreedCTD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
From: cypress/houston, tx
So the AAM has the larger parts?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #24  
TexasCTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,680
Likes: 2
From: McKinney, TX
Yes, he was saying that the AAM axles and components are bigger than the Dana's.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #25  
CrazyCooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 632
Likes: 1
From: Redding, CA
For the rear, AAM 11.5 Hands down. I have yet to work on one in a Chubby or Dodge.

Rear Dana 70's and 80's are always in the shop. Not usually broken, but diff brgs are smoked usually ruining the case.

For the front, I'd prefer a kingpin Dana 60. Parts are easy to come by and the kingpins are way stronger than our ball joints.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #26  
bob4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by XLR8R
Anybody else experienced Bob's problem?
We took out 3 frt hosings in a club outing in one wk-end 2 more since.Many of us have now trussed the fronts.

Bob
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #27  
CatDiesel_762's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Gillette, Wyoming
I thought I saw a comparison in Diesel Power or Truck Trends that talked about the comparison on the axles. Maybe it was an old 4wheeler magazine. I sure if you do a google you should come across some good comparison information. Maybe check the AAM Axle site. I was just on their and I thought I saw a comparison on their compared to the Brand X.

Shawn
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 01:49 AM
  #28  
pupeperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Northern Nevada
AAM has a website where it lists all of their axles and the specs. Our 11.5 rear axle is rated at 10,800 lbs and the 9.25 inch in the front is rated at 5200. They don't specifiy how much power can be run through them, at least not on the web pages I've looked at.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GlennRMK
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
2
Apr 22, 2008 01:27 AM
Cummins Freak
Other
6
Jan 17, 2007 11:29 AM
Boykid88
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
4
Sep 17, 2006 10:26 AM
Dodgezilla
Other
12
Mar 19, 2005 05:45 PM
Dave65
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
12
Aug 23, 2004 08:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.