3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

E-Rated Tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:14 AM
  #31  
Dorkweed's Avatar
Muted User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: "The Peoples Republic of Illinois".....behind enemy lines
Originally Posted by abc4yew
Drew03, Yep they are within .1 of an inch when new. I have them both on my Duals. The tire I would like to have and I think they would sell a ton would be the 255 85 17... That would be a 34 inch tire 10.25 wide. No rubs even offroading without a lift and great in snow and mud. ks
That's what I was talking about. Maybe even a 265 or 275/85 17!!!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #32  
tweeter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, CANADA
abc4yew, I got the 295/70R17 Toyo M/T. Just uploaded pics today, waiting for approval, but hey fit well with no rubbing. Think I'm going to add the Powerwagon flares to try and keep the debis down off the truck.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #33  
Dorkweed's Avatar
Muted User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: "The Peoples Republic of Illinois".....behind enemy lines
What's affects mileage the most.......a taller tire or a wider tire??
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #34  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dorkweed
What's affects mileage the most.......a taller tire or a wider tire??
A taller tire will help

A wider tire will hurt.

What most people don't understand is the SAE name.

for example:

285 70 17
285mm across. The sidewall height should be 70% of the width, this is the aspect ratio. Last number is a 17 inch rim.

So sometimes a 295 tire will get worse fuel economy than a 285 tire (strictly talking rolling resistance) if the aspect ratios are different.

I wish the tire companies could come up with an 85 or 90 series tire for the extra height, but I think you would lose weight capacity as you get taller and taller.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:00 AM
  #35  
JAXFL1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: JACKSONVILLE, FL
Yesterday morning I noticed that the stock 265/70r17s where cracking on the sidewalls so had to breakdown a month early and get new tires. I looked all over for "E"s but with no luck, they all have to be special ordered. I ended up with 285/70r17 BFG All-terrain ATs. So what do you think will be the results. THey are rated a 3310 but are only "D"s. Will the milage change up/down and how about towing? The sidewalls on these are really thick.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #36  
abc4yew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1
From: Maritimes, Canada
Guys, D load range tires have a lower ply rating than E range tires.... D's infate to 65 psi max, E's inflate to 80 psi.... E's runover a 2" piece of road shrappnel, D's get a flat. The Carrying capacity of D's and E's vary by design... the load range is the ability to carry that load at the maximum pressure safely. I think E's have a higher duty cycle than D's...At rated weight capacity you could drive 1000 miles at 75 mph on E's and only 300 miles on D's before tire damage would occur. (example only) All that said ... I think aftermarket BFG A/T and M/T and a few others at D load range are a better tire than some oem E-range. ks
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #37  
drew03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
when we are talking about going up in sizes like a 275-85-17, or other different sizes we are still getting hit with the 17" curse
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #38  
drew03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by abc4yew
Guys, D load range tires have a lower ply rating than E range tires.... D's infate to 65 psi max, E's inflate to 80 psi.... E's runover a 2" piece of road shrappnel, D's get a flat. The Carrying capacity of D's and E's vary by design... the load range is the ability to carry that load at the maximum pressure safely. I think E's have a higher duty cycle than D's...At rated weight capacity you could drive 1000 miles at 75 mph on E's and only 300 miles on D's before tire damage would occur. (example only) All that said ... I think aftermarket BFG A/T and M/T and a few others at D load range are a better tire than some oem E-range. ks
i had load range c (6 ply) that would shatter glass bottles and never had a flat. A good peice of steel will go through any tire
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #39  
Dynocon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Closure.

A few weeks ago the dealer called and said that they have been busy and to stop in and look at the tires they had in stock.

I stopped in and walked out with 4 new michelin 265x17", mounted on new polished aluminum rims with new center caps. I was quite suprised with the rims, I would have been happy with new tires

He explained that the rims, same as I currently have, were what came on the truck from the factory and they wanted to make sure that I was satisfied. Needless to say I was.

Current tire report: I have 22K on the BFG 275 C rated and still have 80% tread. I rotated them and it seemed to stop the cupping. I compared to a friends who has 24K on E rated and I have more tread that he has.

So after I wear out both sets I will have a decision to make C or E!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #40  
rickkari0304's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: ALGONA, WA
Let me know how the Toyo 295/70/17 work for you. I had a pull with them that noone could fix. Put on the Cooper STT's in 35/12.50/17 and drive perfectly straight. Unless you tow real heavy these seem to be a better fit than any tire I've seen on our trucks without a lift. Even better than the BFG 315. I had the old Cooper St from Les Schwab called Mud Terrain SXT's. These new Coopers have a much more solid sidewall and another ply. Still a D rated but much stronger tire. I'm pretty stoked about these tires!!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #41  
superman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Ocala, FL USA
Originally Posted by Dynocon
Closure.

A few weeks ago the dealer called and said that they have been busy and to stop in and look at the tires they had in stock.

I stopped in and walked out with 4 new michelin 265x17", mounted on new polished aluminum rims with new center caps. I was quite suprised with the rims, I would have been happy with new tires

He explained that the rims, same as I currently have, were what came on the truck from the factory and they wanted to make sure that I was satisfied. Needless to say I was.

Current tire report: I have 22K on the BFG 275 C rated and still have 80% tread. I rotated them and it seemed to stop the cupping. I compared to a friends who has 24K on E rated and I have more tread that he has.

So after I wear out both sets I will have a decision to make C or E!

I sure hope your decision is E! BAD idea running C rated tires on a truck that heavy. I hope you don't tow or haul anything with them...asking for trouble there.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #42  
Vittorio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Arizona Outback
Festus mentioned Toyo finally has a green "E" rated 17" Open Country M-55 tire to fit the stock alloys. Anyone know what they're charging?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 09:23 AM
  #43  
Berak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Sayre, PA
Load range equates to "ply rating" which has no industry accepted standard. All you can really go by is the weight rating. E is supposed to equal 10 ply, but that is almost never the reality. They may in fact be 3 ply. What is a ply? Are all plys equal? No standard. Your better off going by the service description number if available (119S for example). The number gives you the weight rating.


Toyo doesn't list a M55 for a 17" rim on their website. Do they have a new size not listed yet?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #44  
herb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Battle Creek Michigan
Originally Posted by david_4x4
I just don't want a big tire.

While I'm sure I'll probably just go with a D-Rated all terrain, if I can find an E-rated one. I'll be there.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Compar...t=All&x=92&y=7
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #45  
DanTana's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
My 315x17s BFGs are wearing good.

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.