3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Chassis longevity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 12:45 AM
  #1  
quantum610's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Chassis longevity

So one of my friends was giving me hell the other day about how a ford chassis will last longer than a dodge even though the engine is almost bullet proof. Has anybody had problems with body or chassis on a 3rd gen?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #2  
PourinDiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 0
From: Southern, Indiana
No problems here and over 30 hooks to the sled with mine.
Your friend is just jealous. Tell him to get a real truck!!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #3  
v8440's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 4
From: Alabama
I tend to lump that in with the "the engine is great but the truck around it falls apart" comments from chevy and ford folks. Almost none of them ever have any convincing argument as to why or how that is. Usually the best they can do is that their uncle's brother's hairdresser's cousin had one, and it had a window leak at 15,000 miles.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #4  
ColdCase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Does Ford and Chevy have the same ball joint and U Joint issues many of us seem to have? I think about everything else is about the same. Keep replacing the small parts and rust prevent and the chassis will last forever.... or close to it.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #5  
packard8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Just my observation from recently selling a 2001 F350 4x4 PSD (after 92K miles) and buying a Ram 3500 is that the front end on the Ford is a better design….heavier suspension components, leaf springs and most importantly free-wheeling hubs. In six years on the Ford diesel forum I don't ever remember a post about u-joints, hub brgs, ball joints, tie rod ends or "Death Wobble" being a common problem on the Ford.

I think the rest of the chassis is pretty much the same, but I sure do miss the manual hubs that allowed me to spot trailers in 2WD Lo range………. Other than that, I'm real happy with the Dodge so far.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
Turbobob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: West Jordan, Utah
Originally Posted by packard8
Ford is a better design….heavier suspension components, leaf springs
I wonder why Furd has changed over to coils on the new Stuper Doodys!?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
05mxdiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
The ford's wear out ball joints just as quick as we do, they just have more important things to worry about that we don't, i.e. motor.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 04:48 PM
  #8  
Hounddog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
From: Ila georgia
From the Form forums I read the ball joint issues are there also.The G.M forum has injectors dropping like flys.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
packard8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by Turbobob
I wonder why Furd has changed over to coils on the new Stuper Doodys!?
Yeah, I wonder too...I think they changed in 2005? I still prefer leafs.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #10  
SSminnow's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Pearland, TX
Originally Posted by v8440
I tend to lump that in with the "the engine is great but the truck around it falls apart" comments from chevy and ford folks. Almost none of them ever have any convincing argument as to why or how that is. Usually the best they can do is that their uncle's brother's hairdresser's cousin had one, and it had a window leak at 15,000 miles.


Well, my best friend has a 92 CTD and a 00 PSD, the CTD has 350K+ (odometer stopped working 2 years ago) pulls a landscaping trailer w/ eqipment 6-7 days a week. Original engine, trans, and rear end. Can't say much for the other stuff....front end every other year, seats broken, doors sag, windows do not roll up down w/o help, etc........But, it is a work truck, and it get's abused, so........

His PSD does not quite do the work of the CTD, but the only thing to date is worn out arm rest


I have had both now (03 PSD and my current 03 CTD), and seems like they are both good trucks. That brand loyalty is for the birds, each truck has it's +'s and -'s to them.....
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #11  
GMScott's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
I believe Ferd changed to coils for a better turn radius. With the leafs it took a four-lane divided highway to do a u turn. Probably softer ride too.
I've driven both and do have to say that the Ferd (with leafs up front) is a more sure-footed drive. Also, the F-350 SD is really a 450 - tag it to 20k GVW. Dodge - well you know 16k max.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #12  
sweetwaterguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
i have 24k miles on my truck, some of it off road. Every day I have 1/4 mile of washboard gravel to my home. So far, no rattles or leaks whatsoever.
I couldn't be happier.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DieselRV
Competition / Pulls / OffRoad
0
Jul 16, 2013 03:43 PM
m1a convert
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
16
Mar 12, 2011 06:49 PM
supercharger
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
3
Mar 22, 2004 09:34 AM
sdgunslinger
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
2
Apr 5, 2003 07:42 PM
jlells01
Other
7
Feb 1, 2003 03:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.