1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Dynoed today...max hp w/stock turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2004, 04:10 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
NeedMoPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gatesville, TX
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We had a dyno day in Waco this past saturday. There was a post about it in the local in regional events forum for about the last month or so. Not trying to knock you by no means, but I fairly positive you dont have everything I do. When I stuff some more air in the motor, I think the numbers will be totally different...or thats atleast what Texas Hardcore tells me!

I also have some still photos of the dyno run in my gallery if anyone is interested.
Cody
Old 08-24-2004, 03:47 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Texasblake, I dynoed in Utah and live in Colorado. The dyno was at 4400 elavation and I live at 4600 elevation. Im trying to figure out why im not geting more power just like you are. I will get more power soon,just like you will when you start asking questions.
Can you say "BOMBing" its an addiction

Mustang dynamometer 8-14-2004
332.8@2250 RPM
794.1@2100RPM
1992 Dodge 1 ton 2WD
Old 08-24-2004, 09:26 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
cethane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by wannadiesel
I think the best low-buck solution would be a 16 cm housing and a Stage 3 compressor and pinwheel set from High Tech Turbo, the whole setup will cost less than $300 and be like a hybrid HX-35 with an HX-40 compressor wheel.
The HTT stage III is a great setup. I'm running it with a 12cm non-gated housing. I added the stage III & pods at the same time and got an 84 rwhp gain without touching the pump. I was told that the PODS alone should add about 55 rwhp. I'm sure that the 12cm is cutting my top end hp (I put down 313/749 at the VADTR rally last month ...... but I still have plenty of fuel left to play with). The 16cm would no doubt be the better choice to make good hp, but I like the 12cm as far as daily driving is concerned (have to be careful on wet roads ) The only drawback (not for me) is the whistle from the turbo ...... LOUD ... VERY LOUD. My daughter covers her ears at anything at about 10psi and above.
Old 08-24-2004, 05:39 PM
  #19  
Adminstrator-ess
 
wannadiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Holland, PA
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Calvin-
Thanks for the info on the HTT setup. I've been eyeing it as a possible upgrade if the POD's I plan to install make things too toasty. I'm glad to hear it works well with the 12 cm, I really don't want to lose spool-up. HTT seems to discourage that combination for some reason.

Have you thought about running a wastegated 12 for better top end? You can usually get 'em pretty cheap or free.
Old 08-24-2004, 06:42 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
TexasBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by NeedMoPower
We had a dyno day in Waco this past saturday. There was a post about it in the local in regional events forum for about the last month or so. Not trying to knock you by no means, but I fairly positive you dont have everything I do. When I stuff some more air in the motor, I think the numbers will be totally different...or thats atleast what Texas Hardcore tells me!

I also have some still photos of the dyno run in my gallery if anyone is interested.
Cody
Cool. That's what I figured. Some of my 4x4 buddies went to the dyno. Too bad my truck is in the paintshop, I was cruising through Waco this weekend on the way to Dallas in a friend's truck. We should have stopped by.
Old 08-24-2004, 09:17 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
TexasHardcore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blake...next time ya'll run through Waco, gimme a holler.

361-947-1388 cell
Old 08-25-2004, 12:29 AM
  #22  
Patron Saint of 1st gens
 
Bushy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JMO, but the 12cm and even the 14cm is too small for what you are wanting to do... In fact my 16cm is too small as well, albeit at the very upper end only.
If you do not 'gate the smaller housings you'll have nightmare'ish EGT's...trust me
At the very least run a ported 16cm, including porting your stock exhaust manifold.. just be carefull when you do the porting, you don't want to reduce exhaust gas velocity, just smooth out the flow.

As an aside, I ran a modified HX50/15 on my truck last year... I also had hog nozzles WAY bigger than the POD injectors...
My dyno numbers were 374.9 HP, 1800*F PEGGED, 55 psi boost.
The results were basically a surprise to see ..... the turbo was too big to spool under 2000RPM, and the EGT's got a head start on the turbo so bad that the EGT's were not controllable since I could not stay in it long enough to bring them down.
Now, on the highway, it was another thing altogether.... once I was at, say, 60 MPH and I stepped on it.... well, all I can say is holy mary mother of gord....it was very similar to strapping an SRB to the back and lighting it....WILD RIDE !!!!

bob....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
idacal
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
05-20-2007 10:51 AM
VikingDiesel
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
19
04-23-2007 03:22 AM
red12valve
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
7
07-25-2006 07:34 PM
silverbullet02
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
10
01-17-2006 05:07 PM
masonic-dodge
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
29
12-09-2004 05:16 PM



Quick Reply: Dynoed today...max hp w/stock turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.