1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Best mods for under $600 to a 92 250 auto 2wd?

Old May 1, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
emw911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Best mods for under $600 to a 92 250 auto 2wd?

I recently bought a 92 d250 2wd automatic 3.55 rear truck it has 150k miles and runs great. i am looking to inprove mileage and power. I am planning on purchasing a 4" exhaust, 3200 spring, reground fuel pin, and a different exhaust housing as well as tweaking the pump. My main question is what would be the best choice for the exhaust housing. I mainly use the truck as a daily driver. I also tow cars with a tow dolly 5-6000 lbs max. I was also wondering are there any relatively cheap ways to improve the transmission shifts and or torque converter. Any help would be much appreciated.
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
MJDiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: West River, SD
A pyrometer is probably a good idea. It should be installed before any other mods. I have had good luck with my 12 cm wastegated housing and I have no trouble towing 10,000 +. I have also installed a Hughes torque converter, which was worth the money. When purchased, it set me back about $350 including shipping, but that was two years ago. Even with the Hughes, the transmission is terrible for heavy towing, but 6000 pounds should be no problem with a stock torque converter. A transgo? shift kit could improve the shift quality, and costs about $80.

With a $600 dollar budget, you could probably get the guages, exhaust, gov. spring and pump adjustments (of course). A different exhaust housing might also fit this budget. According to my own personal experience, these are great mods and they will make it feel like a different machine!
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #3  
DBF's Avatar
DBF
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Florida Panhandle
I agree on the pyrometer. I'd change to a 16cm2 non-wastegate (in fact, I did) as a good all-round compromise between towing and light. Pump tweaks will give you enough power.

I'd put all the rest of that $600 into a *good* torque converter, and valve body adjustments or shift kit. You can put lots of power into the stock A518 and just generate heat, but if the trans is solid it all goes to the wheels. Get a trans temp gage so you know when to slow or downshift on steep hills as heat builds up. Gages are cheap compared with transmissions.

My stock 92 put out 134 rwhp. Just the TC and VB plus pump-tweaks took it to 200+ at the rear wheels and it felt great. I tow a 7500# 5er.

Regards, DBF
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #4  
Alwaysworking's Avatar
alwaysonDTR
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
From: Keizer, oregon
16cm housing 195$ or under

i think the 16cm non w/g is the most cost effictive and efficent for an auto
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #5  
NYCEGUY01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: N. Utah
Get a hughes converter and a shift kit.

By the time you buy new atf and beer you will be around 600.

That will help with getting the power you do have to the ground and definately help with the mileage as well.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #6  
Confedpirate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver WA
Originally Posted by Alwaysworking
16cm housing 195$ or under

i think the 16cm non w/g is the most cost effictive and efficent for an auto
dont forget about the 366 spring
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #7  
1tondodge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Western Washington
a 16cm exhaust housing can be had from PDR for $165, that would be an improvement over the lagmaster 21cm that the 92 has.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #8  
emw911's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
are the second gen exhaust housings interchangeable with my turbo? is the wastegated housing better?
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #9  
DBF's Avatar
DBF
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Florida Panhandle
I'll let others handle the compatiblity question. I run over 300hp with a standard H1C & 16cm2 non-wastegated housing.

Everything has a tradeoff. The smaller wastegated housings allow the turbo to spool up faster, perhaps a good thing if you're a drag racer. They also slightly choke the exhaust flow at high rpm, maybe not so good if you're using high rpm to tow a trailer up a hill. Either will do better than the 21cm2 you have in there now.

Regards, DBF
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #10  
Crossy's son's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 2
From: Quinton, New Jersey (middle of nowhere)
Yea for the trans..the transgo is the way to go..it will save your trans's life down the road and help with shifts when the tranny is warmed up. It really made a difference in our 727. However, it is not the easiest thing to install but it can be done by anyone as long as you can read and you have the tools.
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #11  
Confedpirate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver WA
Originally Posted by emw911
are the second gen exhaust housings interchangeable with my turbo? is the wastegated housing better?
What kind of truck do you have?
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #12  
93flatbed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 23
How about two tanks of ULSD a couple of qts. of 2 stroke and a pyro?
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #13  
pwrtripls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX off north Mason Road.
You can find 12cm w/g housings for $75 or less. I may have a total of $600 in all my mods so if you shop around its not too bad. With the auto I would definatly work on the tranny.

Yes a second gen exhaust housing will fit out turbo's and they do make a huge difference. With just pump tweeks you'll make good power and have safe EGT's.
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #14  
big stinky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver island
I would stick with the bigger housing on an auto. The 12s are nice on a 5 speed, but restrict exhaust flow more than a bigger one, which makes for hot exhaust. Autos only have to spool once.
Reply
Old May 4, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
pwrtripls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX off north Mason Road.
your right about only spooling once but you do have a w/g to bleed off the extra pressure, and with stock injectors EGT's wont be an issue towing. Once your cruising on the highway it doesnt matter if its auto or manual, but the smaller housing will jump to the desired boost much quicker. Till your in the 300whp range EGT's and restriction arent an issue with the 12cm w/g IMO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Greed 93
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
6
Jan 31, 2010 09:26 PM
smoky beast
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
11
Feb 26, 2007 09:17 AM
philobeddo
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
1
Jun 15, 2006 06:16 PM
csramsey640
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
12
May 13, 2006 08:00 PM
guh2stroke
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
1
Dec 24, 2005 08:45 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.