518 vs 47rh
518 vs 47rh
Ok been a while since I've posted on this side. I need to know the advantages to a 47rh over a 518 and would it be worth it in the end? i know ya'll are the most knowledgeable on the 518. I've got the opportunity to buy a 47rh now. Quick responses would be most appreciated!
you'll get varied responses as to whether it's worth it or not. I ran my 91 with the 518 and I run the ford with it's transmission (4r100, 4speed auto with lockup) and I would rather have lockup any day of the week.
When I do finally build my 91 up it'll have a goerend 47rh and the motor in the 91 is goin in the 03 ford and the 180ppump is going in the 91 dodge with 47rh.
When I do finally build my 91 up it'll have a goerend 47rh and the motor in the 91 is goin in the 03 ford and the 180ppump is going in the 91 dodge with 47rh.
47RH is the way to go IMHO
. I just took apart a '99 47RE and it had a 5 pinion rear planetary gearset in it and a 4 pinion front planetary gearset, which means strength. The "E" means electronic, while the "H" means hydraulic. Chances are the parts are the same between the two slushboxes.
. I just took apart a '99 47RE and it had a 5 pinion rear planetary gearset in it and a 4 pinion front planetary gearset, which means strength. The "E" means electronic, while the "H" means hydraulic. Chances are the parts are the same between the two slushboxes.
I was going to do the 47rh on my 92, but the information I've read and talking to other people changed my mind. The main thing is the lockup part of the torque converter is not very strong. Fine while your just cruising, but that's all. I was told by some transmission people that you don't want it on for even compression braking. The consensus was a built up 518 with a top of the line converter was a better choice.
I was going to do the 47rh on my 92, but the information I've read and talking to other people changed my mind. The main thing is the lockup part of the torque converter is not very strong. Fine while your just cruising, but that's all. I was told by some transmission people that you don't want it on for even compression braking. The consensus was a built up 518 with a top of the line converter was a better choice.
Trending Topics
I was going to do the 47rh on my 92, but the information I've read and talking to other people changed my mind. The main thing is the lockup part of the torque converter is not very strong. Fine while your just cruising, but that's all. I was told by some transmission people that you don't want it on for even compression braking. The consensus was a built up 518 with a top of the line converter was a better choice.
I think their talking about the stock/OEM non-molested (including pressures) lock-up converter. 
It's a Cummins, and folks hop them up and beat on them. An after-market multi-disc converter with increased hydraulic pressures is common if you're into bombing the engine and increasing the torque output.
I've been told the lock-up could be good for .2 seconds and more at the strip. It's like another gear. But many set the switch so that it locks getting into 2nd gear. It's locked from there till you get off the fuel and disengage it. I'm led to believe a billet/alloy input shaft($) is a must right-off.

It's a Cummins, and folks hop them up and beat on them. An after-market multi-disc converter with increased hydraulic pressures is common if you're into bombing the engine and increasing the torque output.

I've been told the lock-up could be good for .2 seconds and more at the strip. It's like another gear. But many set the switch so that it locks getting into 2nd gear. It's locked from there till you get off the fuel and disengage it. I'm led to believe a billet/alloy input shaft($) is a must right-off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







