General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

turbo vs. Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
gerry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
turbo vs. Supercharger

Is there any particular reason why all the diesels have turbo chargers rather than Superchargers???

Wouldn't a supercharger liven up the bottom end and help to eliminate the turbo lag???

Gerry
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Fronty Owner's Avatar
'People of Wal-Mart' 2010 finalist
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma/Texas
reliability mostlikely.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
rebal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 3
From: Yuba city Kalifornia
superchargers take power to make power...turbos use wasted energy and turn is in to power . aroots type blower will move a lot of air at idle but it would be hard to mount one on. and most modern paxton or vortec type blowers are basicly a belt driven turbo(no exaust turban) ...so why not just use a turbo its free power.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:20 AM
  #4  
Rodram2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR. / Oak Harbor WA.
Old diesel used to have superchargers. the 8-71 blowers got their name by being on 8 cylinder diesels with a cylinder displacemint of 71 cub. inches. They switched to turbos for performance. super chargers take too much power to drive compared to a turbo and ca't flow the same air.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 02:02 AM
  #5  
newriverSpecon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Missoula, Montana
Originally posted by Rodram2002
Old diesel used to have superchargers. the 8-71 blowers got their name by being on 8 cylinder diesels with a cylinder displacemint of 71 cub. inches. They switched to turbos for performance. super chargers take too much power to drive compared to a turbo and ca't flow the same air.
Your talking about a 2-stroke that needed the super-charger to move air into the chamber for start. They also had turbos to build real boost.

Randy
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
2-cycle diesels such as the -53, -71 and -92 series GM used scavenging air blowers. These are not superchargers (although they are used as superchargers in other applications) - they are required to move air through the cylinders in order for the engine to run.

Rusty
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
P Kennedy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Ft. McMurray Alberta
A Roots blower is still a supercharger whether it is for the purpose of maintaining air flow for an engine to run or pressurising an engine for power. Detroit 2 stroke diesels need the roots to run and in the end they were fitted with turbos above the blower for more power. This in it self created problems as turbo boost pressures rise to the point of over running the blowers speed. Detroit then installed blower air operated clutches to release the blower drive so the turbo could push the blower paddles fast than the mechanical drive. The Silver 92 series had this system and it definitely made more power than previous models along with other refinements in the gasket and leak prevention areas. Cat now builds the new series engines with 2 turbos for the afore mentioned reasons to reduce emissions and boost the bottom end. 2 turbos flow together while a blower would become a flow hinderance at higher air flow rates. In the end Detroit dropped the 2 cycle engines in favor of the 40,50,60 Series 4 stroke engines for reliability and economy producing less emissions through direct electronic fuel distribution DDEC1. Thats right Detroit was the pioneer in the total electronic fuel management systems surpassing the automotive industry by having zero mechanical connections to the engine other than the fuel peddle rheostat (TPS). Detroit Diesel still manufactures 2 stroke engines for industrial applications only and even they are being updated to DDEC 4 stroke engines. Street blowers also run at considerably less pressure than diesel turbo chargers on gas engines for anti-detonation reasons increasing mechanical reliability. PK
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
Originally posted by P Kennedy
A Roots blower is still a supercharger whether it is for the purpose of maintaining air flow for an engine to run or pressurising an engine for power.
Supercharging, by definition, means the air pressure is higher than atmospheric pressure at the beginning of the compression stroke - that's why they call it super (meaning "above") charging - the engine is charged above atmospheric pressure. Scavenging blowers used on 2 cycle engines do not meet this criteria since on most 2 cycles the intake ports close before the exhaust ports/valves. This means that the trapped air in a non-turbocharged 2 cycle is basically at atmospheric pressure (minus exhaust passage flow losses) at the beginning of the compression stroke, and the engine, by definition, is NOT supercharged.

This is an industry definition - I'm quite aware of the implications of the use of the term "supercharging" since I've been an employee of an engine manufacturer for over 31 years with 27 of those having been in technical management.

Rusty
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #9  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Both would be much better. Well I thought I had seen someone playing with supercharger on a Cummins.

http://www.turbodieselregister.com/f...d.php?t=126750
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
RustyJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 4
From: Cypress, TX
Yeah, Piers Harry and his guys were toying with a supercharger on a B-series Cummins.

Rusty
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:35 AM
  #11  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
I think that should remove any lag from his twin setup .
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tyson686
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
6
Dec 13, 2010 09:57 AM
trik396
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
10
Dec 11, 2005 07:28 PM
hotdram
Other
19
Apr 13, 2005 12:17 PM
Battering Ram
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
19
Apr 24, 2003 02:11 AM
Cumminsdieselboy
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
14
Apr 23, 2003 10:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.