General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Some engines I've noticed...

Old Jan 9, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
welder27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, FL
Some engines I've noticed...

In the past couple of days I've noticed 2 different trucks, one was a hydraulic crane driving down the road, the other a dump truck. Both had some kinda V-8 diesel in them and were older...probably from the 70's or early 80's. I heard them both revving up the RPM's and each time they shifted it sounded like they couldn't accelerate very fast like a regular inline 6. Another thing I noticed is I couldn't hear the turbo at all! Normally on a semi-truck you can hear the turbo singing. I didn't see very much smoke coming out of the stacks either.

Makes me wish I got the Cummins 'cause it's an I-6...more turbo spool-up, more smoke, more of everything in a package that's 1.4 liters smaller than 7.3.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #2  
Rain Man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Moneta, Virginia
No turbos

Probably dont have turbos on them. The early Fords with corn binders didn't have a turbo or an intercooler. Couldn't get out of their own way. I have a friend that has a Ford powerstroke, 3/4, 4x4, and his son has a Dodge CTD, 3/4, 4x4. Both trucks geared the same. When they run cattle to the stock yard they try to load even and go at each other on the way. My friend stated that the Ford will stay ahead of the Dodge on the flats but when they hit the grades he has to shift the Ford to just keep up with the Dodge which never shifts down. I6 and V8, thats the difference.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #3  
fschiola's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 1
From: Where water boils at 193.4°
If they were that old the may have had Detriot Diesels in them. Especially if they sounded like they were really wound up before they shifted. I've never driven an 8V but the 6V92's that I have driven you couldn't really hear the turbo. Also if they were heavy ( the crane is that way all the time) they won't pick up engine speed like our trucks will. Even the 2004 International I have at work, that has a DT466-I6 engine, when I'm heavy takes a while to pick up engine speed in all but the lowest gears.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
Dieseldude4x4's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 1
From: Claremont, Virginia
Those old Detroit V-6's and V-8's sounded like they were about to come apart. You had to crank them about 2800 or 3200 to get anything out of them. They had an awsome sound for sure. We have three of the 8-71's at work for back up pumps.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #5  
mikmaze's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,502
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Grove, New Jersey
yeah the detroit sound is unmistakable whistlin like a tornado. can't get out of their own way until ya put a load on them, seemed the way they were timed it wouldn't run good untill it was boggin a bit then you could move a mountain. The caterpillar 3208 (a v8 ) motor was popular motor for gmc to stick in their brigadier trucks, without a turbo they were fine until ya really pushed limit of weight like trying to drag a 580 case backhoe up a hill on a trailer then I feel bad for the cars behind ya.... even with a split rear them gears arent close enough together
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #6  
racermatt2606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, TN
something i have noticed about the cummins. some of them you can hear better at idle. and its not because one is a 2valve and the other is 12. i mean liek soem 12 vavle are louder than my 12 vavle. mine is pretty quiet at idle. what coudl thaat be
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #7  
Redleg's Avatar
I was banned per my own request for speaking the name Pelosi
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Bristol Michigan
Originally posted by racermatt2606
something i have noticed about the cummins. some of them you can hear better at idle. and its not because one is a 2valve and the other is 12. i mean liek soem 12 vavle are louder than my 12 vavle. mine is pretty quiet at idle. what coudl thaat be
Injectors, valve lash, fuel return valve. Lots of thing contribute to the clatter.

The Detroits we ran in outr APC's in the service had blowers on them. Ours had a heavy targeting station that should have slowed us down. We were usually a tad quicker off the line than the others though. I guess the extra weight may increase drive pressures and help with power. They would only get to 26 mph on level ground, but could just up do that at a verticle climb too, if the track didn't slip.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
fschiola's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 1
From: Where water boils at 193.4°
I think that one of the reasons that the old DD's were quicker off the line had to do with their being a 2 stroke.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 06:12 AM
  #9  
koonster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Yulee, FL
They cound have been a 903 CUMMINS V8 they were rated from 250hp to 375hp painted black. They were very popular in the late 70 early 80. They were mostly used in almost every thing heavy duty. Also Mack made a V8 diesel for HD construction truck use.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
Ripper406's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
We have a 8V-92 in a Semi truck with a bunch of tanks, use it in the orchard now, yeah it sounds totally wierd like its crushing something and its about to blow up the same time.

Anyway about the Cummins not having to change gear up a hill and the Ford does. I think the reason for that would be the TQ curve, the Cummins has bigger cylinders, and a much longer stroke which contributes to more torque. The Ford has smaller cylinders, smaller stroke, and can be spun at a higher rpm b/c it has a lighter rotating assembly then the Cummins 5.9. Which means the Ford has to downshift, and bring the rpms higher to pull the hill.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #11  
CTD NUT's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,539
Likes: 7
From: Caistor Centre, ON, Canada
A lot of old Fords had non turbo Cat V8's in them that had no top end power in them at all - especailly when stuck in front of a big 'ol slush box auto!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cbx
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
4
May 18, 2009 07:23 PM
Dwitt0187
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
20
Apr 5, 2008 10:42 PM
jlbota
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
12
Nov 18, 2003 09:58 PM
hellotbone
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
10
Aug 27, 2003 03:26 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.