Big Rigs Talk about other Cummins powered vehicles here. As a matter of fact, it doesn't even have to be Cummins, but it will be diesel! :)

Dodge Sprinter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2011, 01:03 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
truckerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Niagara Region , Canada
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Dodge Sprinter

So I had to drive a Dodge Sprinter 750 miles last week .
Normally I'm in a big rig so this was something new for me .
Anywayz , when I looked under the hood , I see a 642 cu.in. (according to the sticker on the rad support) V8 Mercedes diesel .The sticker also said 154h.p.
Sounded pretty strange , 642 cid and only 154 h.p. ! Well when I got in and drove it , WOW !! what a rocket ship ! Right up to 65mph when the **** governor kicked in and spoiled the fun .
So after the run , I checked the fuel mileage and it was 23mpg. Pretty good I'd say .
Anybody else ever drive one ? What was your experience ?
Old 01-10-2011, 01:43 PM
  #2  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
truckerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Niagara Region , Canada
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Oh, that 23mpg included 5 hours of idling .
Old 01-10-2011, 04:52 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Howy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pierre, SD
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The wife and I looked at an original model with the inline motor and really liked them. We really liked the older one that had the low roof and short wheel base. I just couldn't get over not having 4x4 or AWD. I never did look at the new version, plus the high cost and little to none off the sticker really pushed me away from them. Overall, I liked the simplicity and options, but stuck with my pickup instead.

Have a good one.
Old 01-10-2011, 06:06 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
BarryG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 42 Posts
We have a couple at work, 2002's. They work fairly well. Pretty peppy and yeah good mileage.
Old 01-12-2011, 08:59 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
deerslayer1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know why the sticker said that for cubes, mostly because its a foreign engine builder so you would think it would be in litres, and those are only a v6 and 3.0l if my memory serves me correctly. I will say though, they are peppy little things!
DS79
Old 01-13-2011, 09:12 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
truckerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Niagara Region , Canada
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hey deerslayer , So it's a 3.0L v6 ? That makes a lot more sense than 642 cu. in. I did think that it was a V8 . I guess I should take a closer look at it next time .
Old 01-13-2011, 10:27 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
dott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by deerslayer1979
I dont know why the sticker said that for cubes, mostly because its a foreign engine builder so you would think it would be in litres, and those are only a v6 and 3.0l if my memory serves me correctly. I will say though, they are peppy little things!
DS79
Yeah, I thought they were 3.0 also. I have a couple customers with them and they really like them. As said, good mileage, enough pep and lots of interior room.
Old 01-13-2011, 10:44 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
deerslayer1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing I forgot to mention though, if you have to work on them, they suck! My last employer had them and the techs had to go to Sprinter specific training. The one thing that stood out to me was that you could only jack the truck up in 4 places. If you did jack someplace else you take the chance of bending the frame. Oh and the fuel filters suck A LOT to change.
DS79
Old 01-14-2011, 07:56 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
truckerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Niagara Region , Canada
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I had a good look at the engine label again and now I saw where it said CID 182 , so yeah it's a 3.0 l . I'm lucky , I'll never have to work on it .
Old 01-24-2011, 01:39 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
totalloser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 599
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Impressive fuel efficiency, but the thing that turned me off to them other than the lack of a front drive axle was the towing rating. The efficiency numbers are shocking though. Unloaded the smaller chassis get into the 30's! And most can get 25 fully loaded.
Old 04-24-2011, 08:25 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
b1mmuo27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Waterford, Ontario
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll add my 2 cents. I had a new 2005 & loved it, great mileage, good in the snow, long run on tires. BUT at 230,000kms it threw a glow plug. I took the head off-aluminum. Toast. Parts for it were ridiculously priced by Chrysler . The engines are meant to run up to 800,000kms & toss em. You could not give me another one. It has to be built in North America. Parts accessibility here in Canada was extremely limited in the after market. I'll take the Cummins over the Mercedes diesel anytime.
Old 07-24-2011, 09:48 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
totalloser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 599
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to hear that. Parts availability should get better with time (hopefully) since Fedex and UPS are using them as delivery trucks now. Alongside UPS's old skool aluminum bodied diesel repowered ancient box trucks, that is.

I wonder if the glowplug lifespan is adversely affected by emissions driven already running cycles. IE glow plugs continue to cycle after the rig is running. On older Fords a lot of folks put the glow plug on a toggle to nearly eliminate premature wear on glow plugs.

With delivery carriers snatching them up, I see them becoming more and more common, so parts availability and aftermarket support are hopefully not far behind.
Old 07-27-2011, 06:52 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Nick02Ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fremont, OH/Newport News, VA
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've driven one a few times test driving after working on em. It drives pretty well, comfortable, and it does have decent get up and go. But yes, PITA to work on. It doesnt even come with a dipstick to check trans fluid. It just has a cap, you have to buy a special dipstick made just for it, and it doesnt stay on the vehicle, found that kinda strange. Only problem they had with it was a taillight went completely dead. Tried to repair it, but there's no wires in the thing, its all just like metal strips, never did figure it out, ordered a new one. OTR mercedes engines are a pain, too. I used to change out injector lines all the time, #4 would crack constantly
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUGIE DOG
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
11
03-07-2012 01:59 PM
ian515
Other
14
06-02-2008 06:40 AM
hertz
General Diesel Discussion
3
05-15-2006 11:55 AM
tmleadr03
General Diesel Discussion
12
12-31-2005 04:14 PM
screaminbanana
General Diesel Discussion
14
06-08-2005 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: Dodge Sprinter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.