3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

Changes from year to year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
horsinaround's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Changes from year to year

I am thinking about selling my 03 and getting a newer dually for more towing capacity. I tow a pretty big trailer often.
What are the changes from year to year in the body. I am looking specifically for when/what models have a bigger back seat. Is it offered in a dually?

I am sure there is a post here that summarizes the changes and options, but ? can't find it... can someone help?

Is it worth getthing the 6.7? My 5.9 24V. has been fantastic. Somehow I think that I have to go pretty new to get a big back seat... I think that means the 6.7 and associated emisions stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 02:53 PM
  #2  
RamGazer's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 2
From: Wolfforth, Tx.
I had no luck w/ the 6.7 and the mpg's were killing my wallet. 8mpg in the city. I'd stick with a 5.9 24v as better mpg's, no EGR to mess with (you would want to a delete). Sorry I can't give you more info but I know others will chime in.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
Shorts's Avatar
There is no G. There is no G. Repeat after me, THERE IS NO G!
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 4
From: Texas
Originally Posted by RamGazer
I had no luck w/ the 6.7 and the mpg's were killing my wallet. 8mpg in the city. I'd stick with a 5.9 24v as better mpg's, no EGR to mess with (you would want to a delete). Sorry I can't give you more info but I know others will chime in.

Actually your post is exactly what I was thinking. I have no experience behind the wheel of a 6.7L except for a test drive. Lately I have been spending time on the 6.7L forums. The deletes look to be required to have mpg on par with the 5.9L.

A 5.9 will cost you a bit less to buy. I know the 6.7L is touted for bigger muscle than the 5.9 but the 5.9 ain't no slouch.

If you're looking for room, look for a Mega. They started in '06. Megas only come in short bed from the factory. If you need a long bed you'll need to do an aftermarket conversion. I think the cost of that is around $5k-$6k.

If you stay with a 5.9L, I would look for an '06-07.5 5.9L. You can still find them young enough that you can enjoy the early mileage life and wear it in like you want. I think that you might take a slight hit in the MPG department though. Seems like '03s have a better mpg across the board of the 3rd gen trucks. In '06 is when the truck's front end got a little face lift from 03-05 styling. The interior got a slight change. The '06 5.9 is rated at 325hp/610ftlbs.

Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
RamGazer's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 2
From: Wolfforth, Tx.
I know a co-worker who had the dwr flatbad w/ the 5.9 12v and he got a lot higher mpg than I'll ever see. B.T.W. his was all stock w/ over 700,000 miles on it.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
Shorts's Avatar
There is no G. There is no G. Repeat after me, THERE IS NO G!
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 4
From: Texas
Originally Posted by RamGazer
I know a co-worker who had the dwr flatbad w/ the 5.9 12v and he got a lot higher mpg than I'll ever see. B.T.W. his was all stock w/ over 700,000 miles on it.
Yeah, 12v are hard to beat for mpg. I was speaking of the 5.9 in regards to the 3rd gen CR applications.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trophystock
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
4
Jul 16, 2006 11:00 AM
jason88
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
5
Jan 26, 2006 11:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.