Anyone have update on Hankook
I have the Dyna Pro's. I like them alot in all weather conditions they are quite . and wear very well. I am very happy with them. I just wish I had gone with the 275.
The place i got them from deals with a very large volume of truck and offroad tires. They said that Hankook anf Nitto's are the the best, easiest mounting tires they sell. They report very little if any weighting needed for both.
The place i got them from deals with a very large volume of truck and offroad tires. They said that Hankook anf Nitto's are the the best, easiest mounting tires they sell. They report very little if any weighting needed for both.
I mounted and balanced the tires tonight...most balanced fairly well 2 had high roadforce variation and higher weight then I would like to see, road force balanced these 2 (moved high spot of tire to low spot of rim) and road force came out good as well as weight was drastically reduced. All in all I am fairly happy with how they balanced out. My roadtest home from work was good. Tires are much quieter than I expected based on the somewhat more aggressive tread than factory. As far as 265/70R17's fitting on a dually...no problem, at least with these Hankook RF10's. Definitely no need for a spacer at this point. I would be willing to bet I could fit 285's with no problem...not sure if I really need to go any bigger however. I checked speed accuracy on the way home with my GPS and my GPS was approx 2 km/h slower than my speedo, this is pretty close to what it was with the factory 235's.
So far all in all I am happy with my decision to go with the Hankook RF10's
So far all in all I am happy with my decision to go with the Hankook RF10's
For all us dually owners wanting to run larger tires I sure wish the tire manufacturers would come out with a 255/80/17 or a 265/75/17.This would get us the taller/slightly wider look without the use of a spacer.
I didn't think they were making them yet? I saw them listed as a "soon to be" availible size.If you know who has them please tell cause that would be the perfect size,IIRC they were gonna be E load range also!
All I've seen is from 'Google'. but a few people said $WPW has them. IDK for sure.
well 4 balances in two months, we will see if this guys machine can do the job, if not, i will be getting rid of mine, if I have to drop off the tires at ther headquarters i will do just that, I live 20 minutes from them. getting rediculous I tell ya.
Make sure they do a roadforce balance on them...that alone can resolve many issues.
Also as far as size they are 31.8" for the 235/80R17 and 31.7" for the 265/70R17's that is more like an 1/8" or less, not 1/4-1/2". They are wider however and my main argument was S speed rated vs R as well as higher load capacity.
http://www.hankooktire.ca/uploadfile...t/ltr_rf10.pdf
Also as far as size they are 31.8" for the 235/80R17 and 31.7" for the 265/70R17's that is more like an 1/8" or less, not 1/4-1/2". They are wider however and my main argument was S speed rated vs R as well as higher load capacity.
http://www.hankooktire.ca/uploadfile...t/ltr_rf10.pdf
Make sure they do a roadforce balance on them...that alone can resolve many issues.
Also as far as size they are 31.8" for the 235/80R17 and 31.7" for the 265/70R17's that is more like an 1/8" or less, not 1/4-1/2". They are wider however and my main argument was S speed rated vs R as well as higher load capacity.
http://www.hankooktire.ca/uploadfile...t/ltr_rf10.pdf
Also as far as size they are 31.8" for the 235/80R17 and 31.7" for the 265/70R17's that is more like an 1/8" or less, not 1/4-1/2". They are wider however and my main argument was S speed rated vs R as well as higher load capacity.
http://www.hankooktire.ca/uploadfile...t/ltr_rf10.pdf
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Capp35
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
36
Nov 27, 2011 02:02 PM
Shilohman
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
3
May 25, 2009 12:25 PM
nitis
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
7
Apr 20, 2007 11:31 AM



