3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Houston Dealer Recommending DPF Deletes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #16  
96_12V's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: Northern Iowa
Originally Posted by rfeiller
cummins is the one responsible for the mess, the pressure should be put on them directly. they have published this report about correcting the problem. their story was it was early model 6.7s. I'm not sure what that means as far as production quantities or date of mfg.
You were right on about most of your post, until this. This is the doing of the Sierra Club, the EPA, and those powers that be that think any-type of pollutant should be immedialty banned from the planet. Sorry to say so, but Cummins did the best they could with the time, money, and talent avalible, however the next step in '10 and the Tier IV emisisons are proving out to be much more challenging.

And NO, a dealer isn't going to document removing DPF's, and neither shoud one of us. It's why I still drive a 12-valve, to be honest.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #17  
megacabdad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
From: Erie, PA
A dealer recommending that?
Sounds like they are slapping band-aids on a problem that has a much deeper problem, just trying to get angry customer's out of their face.
I'm all for chopping stuff off my own junk, but if a brand new truck that I just paid x amount of dollars for was screwing up still under warranty, and a dealer suggested that, I would be PO'ed for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #18  
Bobcat698's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, WI
Originally Posted by megacabdad
A dealer recommending that?
Sounds like they are slapping band-aids on a problem that has a much deeper problem, just trying to get angry customer's out of their face.
I'm all for chopping stuff off my own junk, but if a brand new truck that I just paid x amount of dollars for was screwing up still under warranty, and a dealer suggested that, I would be PO'ed for sure.
It isn't a band-aid though.. Dodge installed a system that pretty much causes reliability problems because they HAD TO to be compliant with the EPA BS. By removing those devices, it fixes the problem.
Not a band-aid fix at all, the DPF & EGR ARE the problem.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #19  
Scotty's Avatar
Top's Younger Twin
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 21
From: Thanks Don M!
Originally Posted by Bobcat698
the DPF & EGR ARE the problem.
The PCV should be included on this issue. Its gone on my truck after seeing oil heading back into the turbo. Since the surgery on all of this my truck uses less fuel then my 5.9 07 3500 4x4 and prior to the surgery, it used almost double!

Scotty
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #20  
megacabdad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
From: Erie, PA
Originally Posted by Bobcat698
It isn't a band-aid though.. Dodge installed a system that pretty much causes reliability problems because they HAD TO to be compliant with the EPA BS. By removing those devices, it fixes the problem.
Not a band-aid fix at all, the DPF & EGR ARE the problem.
I understand that they are the problem.

But they should be coming up with better answers to these problems as so called professionals then just cutting off these parts, and then failing emmisions if your locale has/will have/them.

Read the whole reply please.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #21  
Scotty's Avatar
Top's Younger Twin
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 21
From: Thanks Don M!
Well, heres something of interest to those concerned with emissions.
When I did the DPF surgery I had also increased the black smoke out the tail pipe. I was not wanting this. However, when I did the EGR and PCV surgery, I can only get a very slight haze on heavy throttle that can only be seen at night when headlights from the vehicle following shows it. The same or similar as when all the emissions stuff was intact. Since there is no emissions regulations and/or testing UP HERE, I might find a place in my travels to see if it passes or not. I have a feeling it will be very close. After learning as much as I have with talking to Environment Canada, I would not be surprised if the truck passes. If I can save non-renewable resources and not blow black smoke, I think that has some value for more then just me saving $ on the fuel costs. Afterall, how does all this emissions stuff have a greater value if we are using nearly double the fuel to comply? I still cannot get my head wrapped around the need to go drive the truck and burn more fuel at my expense to comply with the requirements of this new emissions stuff. Makes no sense to me that we should burn up more fossil fuels to do this.

On Edit:
What comes out the tail pipe of a truck with all the emissions components intact while the DPF Regeneration process is active? When you burn something, a chemical change occurs...what is it during this process and where does it go when the DPF is cleared? I recall that some emissions that are invisible are often more harmful to the environment then those we can see. Does anyone know?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #22  
Bobcat698's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, WI
Originally Posted by Scotty
The PCV should be included on this issue. Its gone on my truck after seeing oil heading back into the turbo. Since the surgery on all of this my truck uses less fuel then my 5.9 07 3500 4x4 and prior to the surgery, it used almost double!

Scotty
So did you do just the PCV or did you do everything at once?

The PCV you speak of is the one sticking into the inlet to the turbo, correct? What did you do, just put a hose on it and stick it beside the block like the 5.9's originally did?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #23  
Scotty's Avatar
Top's Younger Twin
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 21
From: Thanks Don M!
Originally Posted by Bobcat698
So did you do just the PCV or did you do everything at once?

The PCV you speak of is the one sticking into the inlet to the turbo, correct? What did you do, just put a hose on it and stick it beside the block like the 5.9's originally did?
Thats the one.
I did the DPF first and then about a week later I plugged the inlet on the 90* on the turbo and the crankcase now vents to the atmosphere.
Then after about 3 months and too much smoke I did the EGR. I noticed if I did some city driving and then got on the throttle, the truck would dump lots of smoke. Not anymore. A different air intake can help too since the factory filter is like a large brick in there.
Hopefully I did all this soon enough as to not experience any of the long term ill effects of all that stuff being pushed back through the engine. Its a nasty sight inside that intake when you do the EGR!
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #24  
ChrisM55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Sparks Nevada
Originally Posted by Scotty
Thats the one.
A different air intake can help too since the factory filter is like a large brick in there.!

Come on now!! Where is are intake at!!!

After my pipe delete this truck smoked like my bros. 12 valve, after doing the egr delete no smoke no matter what!! Edge all the way up and no black plume! The EGR is what is killing these trucks!!

Chris
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #25  
MikeyB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,543
Likes: 4
From: Tomball, Texas
Guess I'll be needing to do the PCV mod on my Dad's truck!

MikeyB
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 09:39 AM
  #26  
Hillbilly Delux's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Stoutsville, Mo
the h&s kit for my cab/chassis i have doesnt have the bungs welded on for the back pressure lines. they say to unplug the lines off the sensor on the trans, but i see badp has a code free kit and it has the bungs welded on to keep the lines. why the difference? it seems to me it would be better to keep the back pressure sensors in place?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwatso8
4th Gen High Performance and Accessories 2010 and Up
11
Mar 10, 2011 10:10 AM
howe719
4th Gen High Performance and Accessories 2010 and Up
67
Dec 11, 2010 06:51 AM
klx650a2
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up
1
May 25, 2010 03:37 PM
jcmoyer2004
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (6.7L Only)
8
Mar 12, 2010 07:38 PM
coolblue
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (6.7L Only)
6
Mar 9, 2010 05:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.