3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2007 and up 6.7 liter Engine and Drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

2004 6.7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2007, 07:03 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rammandan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 6.7

Now before you guys get carried away with the contradicting comments let me explain. I have an 04 new holland tractor that comes in at 115 hp and has a cummins 6.7. Now my point is that not only does this engine not have the fancy egr stuff that prevents us from tuning but it has a mechanical injection pump. So if some of you rich guys want to play with your new trucks why not take a look at trying that pump on your trucks. Just an idea
Old 01-31-2007, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Administrator
 
Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mustang, OK
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If I remember correctly, the ag 6.7's used the VE rotary pump as found on the first gens. You would actually be taking a step back in terms of efficiency vs. the common rail. IMO, you would be better suited by the common rail from a performance standpoint.
Old 02-01-2007, 08:51 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
jkitterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you sure it is a 6.7? You are giving a HP rating for a 4.5 QSB
Old 02-01-2007, 08:54 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
John DiMartino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Walden, NY
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Ag 6.7 doesnt share the same bore /stroke as the one in the pickups,it is different.
Old 02-01-2007, 01:01 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
dodgepower88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: No Dak
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Ag 6.7 doesnt share the same bore /stroke as the one in the pickups,it is different.
I agree.

From what i've heard the 6.7 ISB uses a bored out block from the 5.9, hence some people are worried about the longevity and expansion issues of the new 6.7L. If that is different somebody will chime in.
Old 02-01-2007, 08:25 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
98.5POS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dodgepower88
I agree.

From what i've heard the 6.7 ISB uses a bored out block from the 5.9, hence some people are worried about the longevity and expansion issues of the new 6.7L. If that is different somebody will chime in.

I spoke with a Cummins rep today at a local diesel shop on this very issue. The 6.7 ISB is a totally new engine, and it has not been put into anything but a Dodge truck (soon Ford 650 and 750).

And for the block - The 6.7 block is patterned after the current 5.9 block but has been beefed up a lot in the block skirts (around the crank area) and with the "married" or "siamese" piston bores. The Cummins rep couldn't remember the exact weight difference between the 5.9 and 6.7 blocks, but did say that it is at least 80 pounds.

Now - I also talked with him about why the C&C is only rated at 305/610 while the 6.7 coming in the PU's are rated at 350/650. He looked up the engine family on the Cummins websight to see if the two are in the same engine family and they are, the only thing that he could find that "MAY" be different is the turbos. He did say that he was looking at the Cummins ISB line of engines, that the 5.9 and 6.7 fall into, but that they are meant for commercial use not automotive use. Having said that, he thinks the only big difference between the two HP ratings is ECM calibration and maybe injectors. Hope this helps.

DH
Old 02-01-2007, 09:42 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
dodgeman01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sharpsburg KY
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The case IH tractor I just bought in 06 has a 6.7 but it has the commonrail fuel system. It was rated at 125HP but pulled 180HP
DM01
Old 02-01-2007, 11:35 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Smkndzl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fair Oaks CA
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6.7 has been around a few years in the industrial side , and they were structural blocks also.
Old 02-02-2007, 07:02 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
RAMRODD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dakotas
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dodgeman01
The case IH tractor I just bought in 06 has a 6.7 but it has the commonrail fuel system. It was rated at 125HP but pulled 180HP
DM01
Don't you hate when that happens
To bad dodge wont use the 4 banger they use in the MXU in their 1/2 ton!! IT has a commonrail fuel system too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gsdog1
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
08-03-2004 10:01 PM
drno
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
3
06-18-2004 06:57 PM
bmallen
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
3
02-29-2004 10:30 PM
shortround
Other
49
02-28-2004 12:06 PM
Huntindad
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
6
02-09-2004 06:45 AM



Quick Reply: 2004 6.7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.