3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

How durable is the 48re auto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #1  
fastmike926's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
How durable is the 48re auto

I am shopping for a new diesel truck, and am going with the Dodge because of the Cummins motor, and am considering the automatic trans. The only towing I do consists of towing a 3 horse trailer full of horses over mostly level ground. I havent seen many complaints about the auto, but I am concerned that it wont hold up with the Diesel motor. Any one have any input for me?
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #2  
Big Bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Post Falls, Idaho
You will be just fine with the 48RE. Even mods up to about 80 HP will be fine. Over that, it will need some attention.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 08:04 AM
  #4  
bluebull's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: Where hell freezes over.
For longivity of the transmission I wouldn't add any Hp upgrades even if it can handle it for the short term. The auto is a reliable transmission when used within it's perimeters.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #5  
RAMI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Finland
topic from dtt:
http://www.dieseltrans.com/phpBB/vie...highlight=48re
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 10:45 AM
  #6  
bluebull's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: Where hell freezes over.
I just love it when an aftermarket product producer makes writen statements that turn out to be, well whatever.

Isn't he the same guy that said back in the early 2000's that a triple disk torque convert could not be made to work properly and was useless because he tried to make one and there is no possible way it would work.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #7  
Chubby's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Albany MN.
I have a little less than 30000 miles on mY 04.5 Dually, most of the miles where pulling a 40 ft enclosed trailer from Minnesota to montana. I havent had anu problems with the auto In this truck seems to work great. I have a edge juce w/attitude and usallu pull in tow mode. I have 4.10 gears and that seems to work well.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #8  
dodgedude361's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: new york, where else?
Originally posted by RAMI
topic from dtt:
http://www.dieseltrans.com/phpBB/vie...highlight=48re
That report has been bouncing around for over a year now. I have not heard of one tranny failing due to this problem. I have 53,000 miles on it, with an EZ set on level 4, and i tow a 9,000 lb TT. Not one problem yet. I know its still kinda early, but you would have heard of at least ONE failing from this washer problem
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #9  
XZILR8N's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
I just completed a 1,500 mile haul from Denver to Nothern California. I hauled a 3 horse GN with two 1300 lb horses plus lots and lots of gear, putting the GN right at 10k lbs gross. The 48 RE was worked VERY HARD when I crossed the Sierra Mtns ascending and decending several mountain passes on Hiway 399 out of Redding CA. with 6 to 9% grades and what seemed like endless switchbacks. The Interstate driving from Denver to Reno on I-80 W. at 75 mph was smooth and effortless.

To alleviate your fears the 48RE has performed flawlessly for me to date!

I have 20k on my 04.5.
Reply
Old May 26, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #10  
i6DZUL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Central NC
Flawless @ 21,000 miles. Occaionally it tows a 31' travel trailer. GVW is 15,500 lbs. on the scales. Couldn't be happier.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #12  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Tschwab,

However much I like my Dodge, I would have to say that performance wise the 48re is the worst of the 3.

Being essentially a 727 with overdrive (i.e. a hydraulically shifted 4 speed), there is no way for it to outperform an electronically controlled 5 speed.

This is why, bone stock, both the Duramax and PSD are faster 0-60 and 1/4 mile even though those engines have less stock power/torque than our CTD engine.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #13  
Mcmopar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Sounds like you guys need to define performance!!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #15  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Hate to burst your bubble.

But loaded with the same trailer i.e. towing), the 325 psd with 5 speed torqshift will out accelerate a 2005 CTD with 48re. Uphill, flat, whatever, it simply has more gear ratio being available to put the power to the ground.

I have towed with both (all 3 actually with manuals and automatics) and I still bought the CTD, so we are on the same side here.

However, you are dead wrong about electronic control on 48re's. The only parts of the 48re that are electronically controlled are O.D. and the torque converter lock up. 1,2, and 3 are hydraulically controlled. No matter what the computer says, the 48re will not shift until the line pressure is right. With Allison and torqshift, all gears can be electronically selected.

My comments were completely related to performance, not reliability.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.