3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

285/75 vs. 35's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2008, 05:50 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hintz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia... Iowa Bound
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
285/75 vs. 35's

For G56 guys what do you guys think would be the better tire, the 35x12.50 or 285/75/17? I want to get rpms down, and try to pick up a MPG (or a least not lose as much)
Old 04-13-2008, 07:33 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
rallydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey Shore
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most likely it will be the thinner tire (285/75) that will provide the least rolling resistance and better mpg, but both the 285s and 35s will be heavier than stock, so that needs to be taken into account as well.

Even still, I gained a bit of mileage when I went to 305/65s from the stockers since I was able to drop hwy rpms by ~200-250.

-Chris
Old 04-13-2008, 08:27 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
snoyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running the Toyo MT 35s on mine, and while my RPMs are down on the highway, the lift and the heavier tire have dropped my MPG by about 1 MPG on the highway. I would say no lift, and a skinny, tall tire would obviously be the best for better MPG.
Old 04-13-2008, 09:29 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
BIGDAN65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just went to 35's i have an auto with 3.73. i was turning 2k at 80 last night
Old 04-13-2008, 04:22 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
snoyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And for the RPMs, I went from 2K RPM at about 64 MPH, to being about 73 MPH for the same RPM. The 35s definately helped to drop the RPM on the highway.
Old 04-13-2008, 07:37 PM
  #6  
madhat's monkey boy...
 
matego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a NV5600 but I have 35x12.5's and I lost about 1mpg. The r's are a lot lower at highway speed but the tires are very wide and cause more resistance.
Old 04-13-2008, 07:55 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Danderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,443
Received 39 Likes on 31 Posts
I'm going with the 285-75-17's next due to these awful fuel prices. I've got some H2's ready to go in the shed,but it looks like 35's are not going to happen.
Old 04-13-2008, 09:43 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
dubster23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any big diff. in RPMs with the 285/75s?
Old 04-13-2008, 10:05 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
aggie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Radford, VA
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been trying to decide which size to go with for awhile. After seeing the thread with 305's, I may end up with that size. I like the look of a fuller fender well.
Old 04-17-2008, 07:04 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snoyes
I would say no lift, and a skinny, tall tire would obviously be the best for better MPG.
It's too bad that the tire manufacturers won't give us a tall skinny tire like 265/85-17 or a 285/80-17. Right now I'm running 35s & wish that I can get the gear down effect without going to a tire 315 (12.5) wide.
Old 04-17-2008, 08:31 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hintz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Georgia... Iowa Bound
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I put on 315/70 BFGs hasnt seem to hurt the MPGs, but the speedo is still off
Old 04-17-2008, 08:35 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
paroxysym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: baltimore, md.
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eventhough im running a 48re, the 35s did lower the rpms. i can see it doing the say for the 6spd. they are about an inch and a half wider than the 285s and are heavier. they lower the rpms, which adds up to alittle better mpg. plus they will look better too.
Old 04-17-2008, 08:35 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
snoyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep,

Seems the tall, skinny tire would be the answer but not a really good answer out there. Maybe as fuel prices increase and there becomes enough demand, they'll start to make one?
Old 04-17-2008, 01:51 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Ledfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ft. Myers, Fl.
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dubster23
Any big diff. in RPMs with the 285/75s?
I replaced my 315/70/17 with 285/75/17 and didn't notice any rpm change. Thes two sizes are about the same diameter.
Old 04-17-2008, 03:05 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ledfoot
I replaced my 315/70/17 with 285/75/17 and didn't notice any rpm change. Thes two sizes are about the same diameter.
Does a 285/75-17 exist? Don't you mean 285/70-17? If that's the case then the RPM difference is significant. The 315 has an OD of 34.4 & the 285 has an OD of 32.7" which is a 5% difference (100 RPM at 70 mph).


Quick Reply: 285/75 vs. 35's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.