Towing and Hauling / RV Discuss towing and hauling here. Share your tips and tricks. RV and camping discussion welcome.

3.73 verse 4.11 rear end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2005, 12:00 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hemlockusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CONDEMDED TO KANSAS
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.73 verse 4.11 rear end

I have a 1996 3500 dually with a 3.54 does really well 23-24 hwy mileage and about 9 to 14 towing 32 foot TT about 8800#

I like the non towing mileage the 3.54 gets however the newer Dodges just have the 3.73 and 4.11 How much difference is the mileage between the 3.73 and the 4.11 on the average?

On long hills around here (Kansas) and around Fort Smith (Arkansas) the old 3.54 drops down a little and grunts!!!!!!! still maintains about 55 mph.

Lets face it - with the fuel prices the way they are the towing will be a lot less for me this year and for now on.
What would you do 3.73 or 4.11 just towing about 24 trips a year??

appreciate your input

See you down the road -- John H
Old 08-27-2005, 02:10 PM
  #2  
Chapter President
 
hump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Charles Town, West Virginia
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My truck has 3:73 rears with a six speed and I usually average 18 mpg empty and towing my travel trailer around 12-14 mpg. I am quite pleased with this setup. I have had both the 3:54 and 4:11, and I kinda favor the 3:73's the best just due to the fact that I think their a great all around gear (towing and highway). Seems to have the low end grunt that you need but also is a nice cruising gear while getting on down the road. Just my 2 cents worth.


HUMP
Old 08-27-2005, 03:33 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
John Faughn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St Paul , MN.
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems to me that the G.R. could be lower becouse the eng. has enough power without moding and then theres moding , unless your towing heavy equipt. then it may , so I'ld go for the low GR and mod to your hearts content.
Old 08-27-2005, 09:03 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kerrville eastern new mexico, west texas
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I run the 3:73's and i tow about 80% of the time and its never very light and run a lot thru the hills. i will not have one with 4:10's, my first one had them and I didn't like the way drove as far as speed it would only go 78 on the interstate it was a 95. get the 3:73 ratio and get a light chip and get the better mileage. Thats just my thought.
Old 08-27-2005, 10:00 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hemlockusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CONDEMDED TO KANSAS
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HUNMP - JOHN - RICH I THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT. I GUESS I WILL GO WITH THE FLOW. 3.73 AND LET ER RIP.

THANKS AGAIN MEN!!!!!See you down the road John H
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BradP65
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (6.7L Only)
9
05-18-2012 09:13 AM
Hemlockusa
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
6
09-30-2005 08:01 PM



Quick Reply: 3.73 verse 4.11 rear end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.