Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

S400 Size needed?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #1  
txdodge97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
S400 Size needed?????

I need the specs for the s400 everyone uses in a twin setup?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #2  
rockjeep73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Folsom CA
http://www.citydiesel.net/b2-s400-tu...ml?cPath=32_34
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
dieselman2300's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1
From: Beautiful USA!
Already stepping up to twins? Didnt you just get the S300 about 2 weeks ago?
Anyway you want the S400 with a 75mm wheel.
I bought mine from here
http://www.dallasturbo.com/specials1.html

They are about $100 cheaper than city diesel for the same turbo.
Talk to Dave, they also have a flange kit for another $192. It will save you about $70-$75 buying it from them versus say source automotive.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 03:47 PM
  #4  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
I always thought those "B2" style turbos had excessively larger housings. 1.32 is a VERY large housing on a turbo that size. It will take a bigger top charger to get it rolling well, and it will be a little laggier than some other options....

jmo
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
Diesel- Dummy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: IN
you can get a 1.10 ar s400 if your top turbo is not a ss13 ex s300 if it is the 1.32 will be a good driver ,theres more heat energy in the ss ex than a cast iron ex to drive a 1.32 ar s400 i have tryed both
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #6  
dieselman2300's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1
From: Beautiful USA!
62/65/14 with a 75mm S400 is Rips twins.
This is the most common twin setup.
If you want a twin kit for towing, 62/65/12 or 14 with a 71mm K31 is what industrial injection uses.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
stuckey200224's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: marysville ohio
i have a sps 62-71-14. every shop i talked to told me to use a 1.32 ar housing. how much better will the 1.10 housing spool. but how bad will it restrict the top end. i know you cant get both spool and top end but id like to find the best middle ground.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
paulb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
From: Klamath Falls, OR
The 1.32 ar housing is a good match for a 62/65/14 top turbo. If you go with a tighter housing on the bottom turbo you will want to wastegate the bottom turbo. It not just about spool, but about the balance between the two. If you go with a 1.10 housing on the bottom turbo, then it will be doing more of the work, and you will not be getting as much compounding from the top turbo. You should give Rip a call, he's tried a lot of combos and will make recommendations on what you want out of a twin set.

Paul
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
Mike D's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 1
From: Rural Hall, NC
Any opinion on how a 64/65/12 would do for a top charger paired with a S400?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #10  
stuckey200224's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: marysville ohio
Originally Posted by paulb
The 1.32 ar housing is a good match for a 62/65/14 top turbo. If you go with a tighter housing on the bottom turbo you will want to wastegate the bottom turbo. It not just about spool, but about the balance between the two. If you go with a 1.10 housing on the bottom turbo, then it will be doing more of the work, and you will not be getting as much compounding from the top turbo. You should give Rip a call, he's tried a lot of combos and will make recommendations on what you want out of a twin set.

Paul
how would it work with a 62/71/14?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #11  
paulb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
From: Klamath Falls, OR
Originally Posted by Mike D
Any opinion on how a 64/65/12 would do for a top charger paired with a S400?
I hate to give opinions... I would like to try a 64/14 on top of an S480 though.

Paul
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #12  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Originally Posted by paulb
The 1.32 ar housing is a good match for a 62/65/14 top turbo. If you go with a tighter housing on the bottom turbo you will want to wastegate the bottom turbo. It not just about spool, but about the balance between the two. If you go with a 1.10 housing on the bottom turbo, then it will be doing more of the work, and you will not be getting as much compounding from the top turbo. You should give Rip a call, he's tried a lot of combos and will make recommendations on what you want out of a twin set.

Paul
Bingo. You are not getting as much compounding from the top turbo-- which is precisely my point.

Because the top charger is compressing air that's already under pressure and MUCH hotter than ambient air, the big charger should be doing more work.

Given typical compressor efficiencies (70%), you have to triple the inlet pressure to double the flow. For example, if I have a top charger that is capable of moving 60lb/min and I want to increase total flow to the engine to 120 lb/min, then I have to feed that top charger with pressure that's THREE TIMES higher than atmospheric from the bottom charger.

Putting numbers to it, we'll round off and say CIP is 13psi after airfilter restriction and barometric variance. If the top charger is flowing our previous 60lb/min with 13psia CIP, then we have to provide it with 26psig boost (39psia, or 3:1 PR) to get it to flow 120 lb/min.

A good twins setup, imo, runs the bottom charger at 3:1 or higher, and top charger below 3:1-- closer to 2.5 or 2.7.

3:1 on top and 2:1 on bottom is plenty for 550hp at only 2700rpm with LOTS of EGT room left.

As you lower the top charger's operating PR, it becomes proportionally less restrictive and overall effectiveness should improve.

IMO, the main cause of drive pressure problems is a top turbo that won't "get out of the way."

JMO
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #13  
paulb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
From: Klamath Falls, OR
Originally Posted by stuckey200224
how would it work with a 62/71/14?
RonA and I discussed that at the Redding race track last year. He seemed under the impression that I should try it. As I remember the conversation he said that I would gain some on the top end by reducing drive pressure a little. If and when I need to have my 62/65/14 rebuilt I plan on having it either upgraded to a 62/71/14, or a 64/14 (and having the S400 made into a S480).

With the mods that I have right now, I don't have any complaints about the 62/65/14 on top of the S400.

Paul
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #14  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
Paul I know it s a race truck and all, but what rpms does it start spooling when you're cruising around?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #15  
txdodge97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
No thats not me with the s300 i am using the stock turbo.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.