Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.
View Poll Results: Would you accept drastically reduced HP to maximize mpg?
No. I want potentially better mpg AND enhanced response.
23
65.71%
Yes. MPG is the name of the game, and I'll tolerate a lot less HP to get it.
12
34.29%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Would you accept lower Smarty hp in the name of MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #1  
HOHN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Poll: Would you accept lower Smarty hp in the name of MPG?

Personally, I wouldn't mind a hybrid of the half-power and MPG softwares in an effort to get all-out MPG when power is not an issue.

Anyone else? Let's see if we can talk Marco in a SW update...

H
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #2  
Mike D's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 1
From: Rural Hall, NC
Why not have both? After all, we're all just a download away!~
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #3  
rebal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 3
From: Yuba city Kalifornia
I want to control the power and mpgs when i want, not no stinkin computer. last thing I want is to ask a phord schmuck to wait while I reflash
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #4  
STACKED's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Weatherford TX.
heck no im not all that interested in the MPG i want HORSEPOWER.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #5  
RowJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 1
From: Texas/Oklahoma Border
I would not want the Economy mode any "weaker", I don't think. I tested it on fairly level ground but with some hills... or a load in back... I don't know.

Have not tried SW #0 but isn't that what your looking for?

RJ
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #6  
04ctd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 8
From: Charleston SC
i run my truck in the lowest setting, and baby it around, it's our DD, family vehicle, and grocery getter.

i'd like to see 20mpg with my 4:10's and 4x4, i can do barely do 17.5 hand calc.

it's more better to brag about MPG - no one knows what 600tq is, so bragging about 700tq is pointless.

but you tell them 20mpg around town, ears perk up.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #7  
Offshoreracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Heck, I am probably in the minority but I have been using SW #0 most of the time. I have tried them all but like it for everyday driving. Don't have to worry about how far I plant my foot,although if I hit it in an off boost speed to quick I will throw some decent smoke.

Fred
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #8  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
Originally Posted by Offshoreracer
Heck, I am probably in the minority but I have been using SW #0
Thats awesome man. Even at 1/2 power you could still outrun most of us
What kind of mileage do you get?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
04ctd
Other
19
May 10, 2008 04:57 PM
banzaitoyota
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
8
Jan 21, 2008 08:51 PM
04ctd
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
6
Nov 6, 2007 03:23 PM
GCSS
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
14
May 9, 2007 07:16 PM
dealseeker
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
15
Dec 17, 2002 06:43 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.