Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

Old Mar 20, 2003 | 12:20 PM
  #2  
ACJC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Port Royal, SC
Re:BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

Very interesting report. To date, I am on my second BHAF and so far had not had a failure of the filter media. It does get a bit moist in the south so I will be keeping a closer eye on the inside of the filter. <br><br>Jim
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #3  
DEZLPWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Re:BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

Excellent info, Gear Poet! I think next time I will spend the extra $$$ and go for the 19004.... ;D
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #4  
phox_mulder's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 4
From: Sandy, Utah
Re:BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

If you put a prefilter on it, such as Outerwears, it should last a couple of years at least.<br><br>Not a bad alternative for us that want to stay away from oiled filters.<br><br>I had plans to get a BHAF all along, now I will go with the Marine version.<br><br>phox
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #5  
roperdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
TRUTH IN FILTRATION?



http://www.turbodieselregister.com/f...threadid=81015

Reply
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #6  
phox_mulder's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 4
From: Sandy, Utah
Re:BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

This thread is an oldie.

When I bought my BHAF I had every intention of getting the Marine version, but the Cummins distributor where I got it was out of the Marine, and I took their last regular BHAF.

I did get the Outerwears Prefilter.

When my current BHAF gets near it's replacement date I'll try again to get the Marine version.


phox
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #8  
roperdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Re:BHAF comparison: AH19037 & AH19004 "Marine"

INCANUS

thanks for your info - this day and age, people will either tell you anything to get to buy something or they won't tell you anything and expect some people to take a bite on that empty hook. if the marine filter flows around 900, i would buy it.
i can't understand why some manufacture doesn't make an intake that: 1) FILTERS per OEM spec (~99%) 2) has virtually unrestrictive flow - upwards towards 1k CFM, and 3) takes a &quot;cold&quot; air suction from outside the engine compartment.
i must be dreaming
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
They do make one. It's called the Farr Ecolite and flows 1500cfm...
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #10  
diesel_kid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Tillsonburg, Ontario, Canada
How much CFM do our engines needs for certain hp levels and/or boost levels? I got a 19004 waiting for me at the Cummins dealer I am putting in my truck and I am looking to get up around the 400 hp mark. Is there some info out there that could tell me how much air I need?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:43 AM
  #11  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
You can calculate CFM based on displacement *rpm/3456.

Unfortunately, this doesn't account for boost. If you assume standard atmospheric pressure of 14.7 psi, then 29.4psi on your gauge means you have about THREE times more air going into the engine. Remember, your guage reads zero at 14.7PSIA, so you have to account for that when converting from psig to psia.

Though this isn't a linear relationship, it will get you close.

So, with no boost, you'd have about (2700rpm*359cid/3456)= about 280CFM.

But with 29.4psi, you're looking at about 840CFM!!

It's not exact, because turbo efficiency determines how much air actually moves for a given amount of boost, but it's close enough for planning purposes.

Justin
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #12  
AggiePhil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: College Station, TX
This sounds like a very expensive option, whereas the regular BHAF is pretty economical. Why don't y'all just save up for a ScottyII or something?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2024 | 07:16 AM
  #13  
Marine's Avatar
Registered User
Veteran: Marine Corp
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 6
From: Canuckistan
I'm going to hop in on this old thread.
I spoke with FleetGuard prior to this post (IIRC) and if you search I think I added this info into this forum. They said that the AH19004 (Marine version) has the same flow capacity as the AH19037 at 918 CFM. The difference is the internal cage in the Marine version. They did not say anything about the media being any different.
Thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ckennedy
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
5
Apr 11, 2006 02:39 PM
Mechanos
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
25
Oct 21, 2004 02:50 PM
Mechanos
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
Jul 1, 2004 10:29 AM
fitzer
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
10
Jun 4, 2004 08:53 AM
phox_mulder
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
5
May 7, 2003 06:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.