Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.
View Poll Results: Pick Who You Would Like To See Make a Run Against Ohio St.
Florida
21
33.33%
Michigan
13
20.63%
To Heck With the BCS!!!
29
46.03%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Who Should Go To The BCS Title Game???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #1  
streetsmoker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chapter President
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo, MS
Who Should Go To The BCS Title Game???

Well, with USC loosing, and all the chat on the web saying alot of poll voters decenting from Florida, just want to get your ideas on this.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #2  
Holsteinman's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I think Michigan is second best team, but I don't care if they go or not. I'm sure you will be able to hear the whine from Michigan fans if they don't get to go.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
linetrash75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Boise State only other undefeated team, only seems right to me. I already seen the national championship few weeks back and Ohio State beat Michigan. The Rose Bowl is for Ohio state braggin rights only this year not to see who the best team.
Jed
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #4  
Geico266's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,988
Likes: 7
From: Nebraska
Gotta be Michigan, they are ranked #2.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #5  
Lary Ellis (Top)'s Avatar
Admin Team Leader
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,514
Likes: 207
Michigan played them and lost, a replay would be ridiculous.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #6  
dadwolf2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, NV
Originally Posted by Lary Ellis (Top)
Michigan played them and lost, a replay would be ridiculous.
So in sports, baseball, basketball, football, once a team loses to another team, there's no point in playing them again?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
wrglrroper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
This is the 2nd time in what 3 years Boise is undefeated and getting left out in the cold. Every once in a while if a dog is doing good you have to throw them a bone.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #8  
Lary Ellis (Top)'s Avatar
Admin Team Leader
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,514
Likes: 207
Originally Posted by dadwolf2
So in sports, baseball, basketball, football, once a team loses to another team, there's no point in playing them again?
No sir, it should go to someone who hasn't already lost to them...Naturally
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #9  
rbuchana's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by wrglrroper
This is the 2nd time in what 3 years Boise is undefeated and getting left out in the cold. Every once in a while if a dog is doing good you have to throw them a bone.

The Fiesta bowl isn't a bone?
There is no way Boise is better than Florida or Michigan.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
doomgaze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: London, OH
You know, I was discussing the possiblity of Boise State going to the title game with a friend yesterday. It's good to see that we aren't the only ones that see it this way...

We both seem to think that the title game should go to an undedeated team. Boise State played some good teams. I don't really want to see a blow out (even though I'm an OSU fan), but how will we ever know if Boise State can hang with the so called "big dogs" if we never give them a chance? I say give them one time and if it turns out to be a blow out then we'll have learned our lesson.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #11  
cummins_cowboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Abilene, Kansas
Originally Posted by Lary Ellis (Top)
Michigan played them and lost, a replay would be ridiculous.
I would have to agree. What are we proving if they play each other again? If Michigan beats Ohio, then who is no. 1, it would be a tie. Let Florida play says I.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
nirion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: central OH
Looks like Florida it is. OSU should have another national championship in a little over a month.

Go Bucks!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 02:16 AM
  #13  
streetsmoker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chapter President
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Tupelo, MS
Yup, really didn't matter who the BCS chose, Ohio has this one beet!!!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 03:41 AM
  #14  
jd4230's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Cable, Oh
GO BUCKS!!!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #15  
TX_Diesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
In my opinion, they should do away with the BCS and go to a playoff type setup to decide who gets the best bowl games. The BCS plain and smiple doesn't work.

Example, I"m Texas Tech grad. If Tech went undefeated, they would mostly likely end up like Bosie state and not play in the title game, eventhough we're in the Big 12 conference which is usually one of the toughest conferences. But on the other hand there are a few teams that no matter how bad they seem to do (losing 2 or even 3 games) they still get a good bowl because the BCS is bunk.

my-2-cents
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.