can anyone tell me what fight the jusdges were watching when they turned around and gave bisbing the fight? can there really be such a thing as a local judge factor anymore? why the bias? I would have only given bisbing the third round, Hamil stepped down his assault a bit and bis stepped up, but that no way takes the fight from ham. And crocop, somebody nailed it, he didn't bring the aggression he needed to , someone needed to tell him konga just raped his sister before the fight.

 

maybe it was full handicap match.... mat being deaf and the judges being blind then bisbing has the ***** to say he is the "real" champ.... I believe I would be taking the shortest route out of the octagon in a fight decision like that? Good on Matt for taking it like a man however...

 

I smell a fix in that fight. I guess they need Bisping to win to keep that european market going. Or two of the judges were from england because one judge had it all three rounds for hammill, and how could it be any different? Bisping lost every round, and im a fan of his.

 

I just can't believe that Hamill lost, I'm still mad about it. I've been with Hamill all the way, since the very first time I saw him fight, I knew he was good and could only get better. I think the reason Bisping won was because of the judges, they were more than likely English. That's why I think there should be third party judges, ones from countries totally opposite of both fighters. I was really expecting to see Crocop kick some butt, but he disappointed me. Like Dodgezilla said, all it takes is one loss and the guys lose their mental edge.