Jackson
Banned
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 2
From: Port Deposit, MD
Originally posted by herb
the guilt is evident? the 10 jurors who heard more than we did said the guilt was not evident. Does our constitution not say the jury determins guilt or innocents ?
the guilt is evident? the 10 jurors who heard more than we did said the guilt was not evident. Does our constitution not say the jury determins guilt or innocents ?
\
He had to go to the constitution.....................
That's what got folk's [upset] yesterday.
Administrator
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 235
From: Southern California
Jacko
Yep... We have got all of the freaks here in California, Jackson, Blake, Simpson all within 100 mile radius of me. 
I would of shot the doves as she released them. Can't you eat them?
I would of shot the doves as she released them. Can't you eat them?
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Battle Creek Michigan
Originally posted by pjsnyder76
\
He had to go to the constitution.....................
That's what got folk's [upset] yesterday.
\
He had to go to the constitution.....................
That's what got folk's [upset] yesterday.
Chapter President
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 1
From: Sedalia, Texas
I just heard some of the jurors interviewed on the radio. Some of them had no idea what the questions, pertaining to the case, were all about. The defense team done an excellent job picking the jury.
Do I think he did something wrong...probably.
Do I think he did something wrong...probably.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: God's Country (Castle Rock, Co)
Did he do it? Only him, God and the kids know. Will he get his if he is guilty? You better believe it. God knows all!
But, like said earlier, He got the best justice money could buy!
But, like said earlier, He got the best justice money could buy!
DTR's Self Appointed Beer Advisor
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: On my way to Hell... Need a lift?
I just don't see how they couldn't prove it. He admitted on TV while he was HOLDING the boys hand that he sleeps with little boys. What other proof do they need????
I wasn't in the courtroom and I didn't hear any of the testimony so there may have been some things come out that we don’t know about. I’m sure the mother of the accuser was trying to get some something but this was a criminal trial. The civil trial will surely follow.
Like I said before… if I were going to commit a crime I now know where to do it. It worked for O.J., Robert Blake, and now Michael Jackson.
Britt
I wasn't in the courtroom and I didn't hear any of the testimony so there may have been some things come out that we don’t know about. I’m sure the mother of the accuser was trying to get some something but this was a criminal trial. The civil trial will surely follow.
Like I said before… if I were going to commit a crime I now know where to do it. It worked for O.J., Robert Blake, and now Michael Jackson.
Britt
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: west central Florida
Yep. He's a freaky little freak. But that's not a crime. I don't know if he treated his boy friends as if he were also a kid or if he's a child molester. I wasn't there. Those of you who were should have spoke up and testified. It seems if he were sodomizing little boys, there would be some physical evidence. Some one would have taken their son to the emergency room with the police and had him examined for abuse. I did that with one of my daughter's when she said a neighbor (old man) touched her and her friend on their privates. There is no solid evidence against the freak. Not even solid circumstantial evidence. Only the lynch mob out to get the freaky pop star. It would be a sad day in America when a man could be convicted and sent to prison on child molestation charges with no evidence. Lynch mob mentality is not evidence. However, I believe a grown man sleeping with boys like a sleep over is even very inapropriate and all involved should be charged with inapropriate behavior. I don't care how many chaparones were there. It's wrong. That little weirdo Macullyculken how ever you say it and spell it is just as weird. I'd be more concerned that he molested MJ. What a buncha freaks. But freaky isn't illegal.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Franklin In
I think all the jury of your peers junk went out the window in the 60s im sure it went before then but i only paid attention in half my us history.some people today are so messed up some times im ashamed to call myself a human being.
DTR's Self Appointed Beer Advisor
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: On my way to Hell... Need a lift?
yep... they said he is innocent so he is innocent.
it just seems strange to me that he actually admited that he sleeps with little boys on national tv. "one of the most loving things you can do is share your bed with a child" or something close to that he was quoted as saying. obiviously something is going on. this was the second time he was accused of the same thing. he paid off the first one. but there is starting to be pattern here.
oh well... life goes on.
britt
it just seems strange to me that he actually admited that he sleeps with little boys on national tv. "one of the most loving things you can do is share your bed with a child" or something close to that he was quoted as saying. obiviously something is going on. this was the second time he was accused of the same thing. he paid off the first one. but there is starting to be pattern here.
oh well... life goes on.
britt
