General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

big 3 shoot out on Popular Mechanics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 06:17 AM
  #1  
DISLSMOKE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 203
Likes: 35
From: Lititz, PA
big 3 shoot out on Popular Mechanics

Sorry if someone already posted this big 3 diesel shoot out. What a bunch of crap. Where were they getting the MPG. I think popular mechanics is owned by GM. I would like to know what you big 3rd gen guys have to say about it and what your towing MPG is. A guy at work was bragging about it, even tho he drives a spark-plug infested chevy.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/4230317.html
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 06:26 AM
  #2  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,086
Likes: 49
From: Central VA
From the results page.......

It looks like the Dodge got negative points for the 6 foot bed, and the fact that it drives like a truck.......Well DUH!!!!.........it IS a truck.
If there were a PM award for machismo, our loaded $52,725 Dodge would take the trophy. It was the most ruggedly handsome truck here, with a long cab, short bed proportions and massive wheel flares. But in this test, it’s function that matters. And the 6-ft. 4-in. bed sacrifices some hauling ability for a roomier cab. If moving people is more important than moving stuff, the Dodge trumps them all. This is the crew cab for owners who really need to carry a crew. Those rear doors open wider than the competition’s for easier loading, too.

Despite the people-friendly cabin, though, the Ram’s persona was slightly rough around the edges. It drove more like a commercial-duty rig than the others. Empty or loaded, all it took was one really big pothole to realize the Ram was the most stiff-legged. The driving position is old-school truck—more upright than the others. But we certainly liked the simple, straight-forward interior. At the heart of the Dodge is the all-new Cummins 6.7-liter turbo-diesel inline six-cylinder. The combination made for an unladen quarter-mile time right between the Ford and the GMC. And the Ram’s ultralow torque peak allowed it to scoot to 30 mph quickest. Yet in our braking tests, the Dodge fell behind. The Cummins was slightly noisier at redline than the others but pulled strong under the load of our trailer. The shifts were crisp, if a bit clunky, in tow/haul mode. But that’s easily forgotten when you floor the throttle. The Cummins not only maintained speed on the longest grades, it briskly accelerated our load, leaving cars and SUVs in its wake.

With trailers hitched, the Dodge was much closer to the GMC’s performance. In fact, only two-thirds of a second separated the two in the quarter-mile. And the exhaust brake really helped slow our load on the freeway. The Ram felt relatively nimble, thanks to the quick steering. That made inner-city maneuverability with the 23-ft. trailers a breeze. This is a potent machine; with a bit more polish, it would have topped our score cards.
It sounds like they can't make up their minds.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 06:26 AM
  #3  
rustyshakelford's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
whats a 2 5/8 ball? ive never seen one of those...reading these types of articles makes me stupider

brett
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #4  
j-fox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 1
Is popular mechanics a peterson publications?
If so, it is owned by GM.
I really want to turbocharge my torque. Is there a kit to do this!!!???????
This article is for the beginner buyer, not us in the know.
I have never seen a truck comparison that was done with nearly identical trucks. They are all stacked by the writers. They have a purpose--that is to bias and sell a given truck.
Our real world useage is the real test.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 07:20 AM
  #5  
Totallyrad's Avatar
Administrator / Free Time Specialist
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 16
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Boy.....talk about lop sided.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #6  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
I liked all the comments about the Dodge truck looking, feeling and driving like a real truck.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #7  
rustybudweiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, KS
I like how they go it's by far the best pulling truck of the group, but it came in 3rd becuase it was the roughest riding truck, because it rode like a truck. LOL. That's the thing i don't understand. That's why i'm getting so upset with the auto companies. IT'S A TRUCK, it's not supposed to ride like a car. All the fancy features and whatnot is why pickup trucks are getting so outrageously expensive. Which i don't know about you guys but i don't need all the luxury junk. The fanciest my truck would get would be electric windows and locks. That's why i still love my 24v 2 gen. It's new enough that it's still pretty mainstream i guess you could say, but it's still a truck, not all kinds of fancy buttons and gadgets. I built the truck i want on Dodge a couple weeks ago, brand new 2008 1 ton with the new 6.7 and quad cab, long bed, and 4wd and 6 speed. The total came out right at $30,000. The stereo was as plain as it gets, no navagation system or shiny chrome wheels or anything like that, it was a plain work truck. What they used to be up until the late 90's. Only option i put on it was the towing mirrors, that was it. So yeah in few years when i decide to maybe move up to a 3rd gen, i'm going to build my truck, less money on interior features and more spent under the hood and exterior mods for work.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #8  
cbtumedic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Tx
Originally Posted by rustybudweiser
I like how they go it's by far the best pulling truck of the group, but it came in 3rd becuase it was the roughest riding truck, because it rode like a truck. LOL. That's the thing i don't understand. That's why i'm getting so upset with the auto companies. IT'S A TRUCK, it's not supposed to ride like a car. All the fancy features and whatnot is why pickup trucks are getting so outrageously expensive. Which i don't know about you guys but i don't need all the luxury junk. The fanciest my truck would get would be electric windows and locks. That's why i still love my 24v 2 gen. It's new enough that it's still pretty mainstream i guess you could say, but it's still a truck, not all kinds of fancy buttons and gadgets. I built the truck i want on Dodge a couple weeks ago, brand new 2008 1 ton with the new 6.7 and quad cab, long bed, and 4wd and 6 speed. The total came out right at $30,000. The stereo was as plain as it gets, no navagation system or shiny chrome wheels or anything like that, it was a plain work truck. What they used to be up until the late 90's. Only option i put on it was the towing mirrors, that was it. So yeah in few years when i decide to maybe move up to a 3rd gen, i'm going to build my truck, less money on interior features and more spent under the hood and exterior mods for work.

You don't need all the fancy stuff but it is nice if you can afford it. Also, i just built a truck like you described above, and base price is $29,645, add the cummins and tow mirrors and you come up with $36,380.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #9  
toddschwantes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I really like my 2003 Dodge, but my Dad's Chevy is a really nice truck too. I was really impressed with the mileage he got pulling his 11,500 fifth wheel this summer. We took a trip together and he got 13.5 mpg (I calculated it for him!) and I got only about 11 pulling my 8000# TT. Either I had a lot more wind resistance or the GM guys have something right!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
xtoyz17's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Isn't there more wind resistance with a travel trailer, considering you have a giant pocket between cab and trailer front? That turbulence alone has gotta make the wind resistance greater. Right?

Gearing, transmissions, speed, etc... all play a role in why your mileage was worse as well.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #11  
shift220's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
This "riding like a truck" thing is silly. Just because your truck has a rough, uncomfortable ride, doesn't mean it's a better truck. If the Chevy and Ford can do everything that the Ram can, then why does the Ram have to ride so rough? With the way suspension technology has improved in trucks, the Ram is at an obvious disadvantage and thats why they are getting nailed for it.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #12  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,086
Likes: 49
From: Central VA
Originally Posted by shift220
This "riding like a truck" thing is silly. Just because your truck has a rough, uncomfortable ride, doesn't mean it's a better truck. If the Chevy and Ford can do everything that the Ram can, then why does the Ram have to ride so rough? With the way suspension technology has improved in trucks, the Ram is at an obvious disadvantage and thats why they are getting nailed for it.
Now I'd like to see them throw a load in the BED of the truck and see how they ride.
I know with my dually......1,000 pounds in the bed makes it ride Reeeeeal nice.

That "Caddilac" ride unloaded might be like trying to steer a marshmallow with some weight in the bed......oe maybe not.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #13  
dieselJon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Dixon, IL
LEt the truck break in and then see who gets the best MPG's while towing. Also, the FORD got 2ND just cause it was QUIETER and had more gadgets? Come on! It had the worst economy and it was the heaviest! How much of that weight contributed to the softer ride?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #14  
shift220's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Shovelhead
Now I'd like to see them throw a load in the BED of the truck and see how they ride.
I know with my dually......1,000 pounds in the bed makes it ride Reeeeeal nice.

That "Caddilac" ride unloaded might be like trying to steer a marshmallow with some weight in the bed......oe maybe not.
Well I wonder if the ride is mostly hurt by the SFA compared to the IFS. Otherwise in the back I can't see there being much difference. Throw some air bags in the back and you have a adjustable system that rides like stock when they aren't aired up. But if you start with that harsh ride in the back, then its hard to go the other way
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #15  
Guardrail's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Bonner Springs, KS
The GM truck has 3.73 ratio and the Dodge and Ford have 4.10 and 4.30 ratio rears. I wonder why the GM got better mileage?

2 5/8 ball is exclusive to PM. That way no one runs off with the test trailers.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.