Allison 3000 Tranny Question
i had a 2000 f650 with a cat,the first one blew up and cat replaced it,the new one blew up in 2000 miles and there was no warrenty on it,so they said.
i replaced the cat with a 8.3 cummins and a 10 speed fuller.
the cats suck,as does the warrenty.
beware!!! check with the DOT before you get a F-650 sized truck.
health card,log book,CDL is required if the truck and trailer and load weigh over 29,000 lbs.
also make sure you get the right GVW plates for it.
you do have to go through scales with that size truck.
i sold mine because of all the DOT requirments.
Randy
i replaced the cat with a 8.3 cummins and a 10 speed fuller.
the cats suck,as does the warrenty.
beware!!! check with the DOT before you get a F-650 sized truck.
health card,log book,CDL is required if the truck and trailer and load weigh over 29,000 lbs.
also make sure you get the right GVW plates for it.
you do have to go through scales with that size truck.
i sold mine because of all the DOT requirments.
Randy
Not really sure what you mean by "beefed up electronics". Also...are you sure the name is "TRV3000"? Any allison with "3000" in it has nothing to do with the 1000/2000 transmission. Actually, almost all allisons use the SAME electronics/TCM. Just different programming obviously. If the GVWR is over 26,000lbs or GCWR is over 30,000lbs it is NOT a 1000/2000, because thats all those transmissions are rated for. All allisons are "medium duty", including the 1000/2000. The 1000/2000 are used in plenty of non-GM specific medium duty apps. Just because its the same trans that goes into the 2500/3500 pickups doesnt make it light duty. The cummins ISB goes into dodge 2500/3500 pickups, but does that mean its light duty??
ben
ben
It could be what I've been told is just aimed to sell upgraded transmissions. But ever since day one I've been told that the 3000 is not a "medium duty" transmission and if they want a "medium duty" transmission they need to get the 3200. No, I don't know what that means exactly. All I know is that in order to get the high output engines you have to upgrade the transmission. I see what you are saying about the Cummins ISB comparison, though and it makes sense.
One of these days I'm going to do some in depth research as to the difference of the transmissions. All in time, though... right now I'm just marveling in the fact that I'm the only one of our staff that doesn't think the DT570 in the International 4400 we sell is a Detroit Diesel. I learned quick that if I want the correct information I have to go out and get it myself.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa. & Columbus, OH.
I would LOVE to see an 8.3 Cummins in our trucks with a 10-speed Ultrashift tranny; or at least a beefy Allison (that could take 600-700HP @ 25000 GCVWR). Does anyone think it could be done? I would naturally be upgrading axles since I know weight would be the first obvious factor. I would want to anyway sine I run 10-lug wheels.
Chapter President
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,375
Likes: 7
From: misplaced Idahoan stuck in Albuquerque, Roughneckin on RIG 270
as of right now, cummins is the only one out there that has been able to meet the new 07 EPA standards. Cat has become way overpriced and their warranty sucks, Detroit (well enough said) and Cummins is the way to go. I built a spec for a customer with a ISB 6.7 and the Allison 2500 and is a 33k GVW truck. I would go with the 3000 series or the 3500 series tranny.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fishin fever
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
11
Mar 13, 2006 06:46 PM





