'09 Ram 1500 w/ Cummins V-8 is cool..
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of these with a CTD would be rockin'! No more having to make them yourself. If these take to the aftermarket like teh Dmax and 5.9, would make for one wicked play toy.
#18
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
HOHN,
Where did they put the turbo? Does it have one up in the valley or one on each manifold? Packaging is such an issue with the V engines.
Where did they put the turbo? Does it have one up in the valley or one on each manifold? Packaging is such an issue with the V engines.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
I think that's the building where they do the chrysler development and piloting. Not to be confused with CMEP where the B and C series are built-- at least that's how it was explained to me.
Getting oriented at Cummins is going to take awhile-- I'm drinking from a firehose for sure....
jh
Getting oriented at Cummins is going to take awhile-- I'm drinking from a firehose for sure....
jh
#20
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
I'm pretty sure it is, in fact 5.6L.
I don't know if it has SCR. In general, expect to see SCR in lighter duty duty diesels while HDD might be able to avoid urea-based SCR. When a diesel engine is under heavier loads, it generates less NOx (which SCR targets), so a HDD would use proportionately less urea than a light duty diesel. Thus, it become possible to maybe look at other ways to cut NOx and you don't HAVE to do SCR.
There's nothing wrong with SCR-- but *I* would prefer to avoid the extra weight and complexity if another option was available.
IIRC, urea costs about the same as fuel, so it's not too bad. I think I read that something like 15% urea/fuel ratio for a typical SCR setup. That means your urea tank will be about 1/6th the size of your fuel tank if those proportions are true.
Keep in mind this is all just very vague generalities, and the specifics are going to vary considerably based on engine design and ESPECIALLY on usage profile. A grocery getter is going to have a very different aftertreatment approach than a HDD will.
I got to sit in a demo truck yesterday and listen to a development heavy duty engine while some guys tweaked the software.
I love my new job.
I don't know if it has SCR. In general, expect to see SCR in lighter duty duty diesels while HDD might be able to avoid urea-based SCR. When a diesel engine is under heavier loads, it generates less NOx (which SCR targets), so a HDD would use proportionately less urea than a light duty diesel. Thus, it become possible to maybe look at other ways to cut NOx and you don't HAVE to do SCR.
There's nothing wrong with SCR-- but *I* would prefer to avoid the extra weight and complexity if another option was available.
IIRC, urea costs about the same as fuel, so it's not too bad. I think I read that something like 15% urea/fuel ratio for a typical SCR setup. That means your urea tank will be about 1/6th the size of your fuel tank if those proportions are true.
Keep in mind this is all just very vague generalities, and the specifics are going to vary considerably based on engine design and ESPECIALLY on usage profile. A grocery getter is going to have a very different aftertreatment approach than a HDD will.
I got to sit in a demo truck yesterday and listen to a development heavy duty engine while some guys tweaked the software.
I love my new job.
#25
Registered User
#27
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
[QUOTE=Digital Bullet;2130466]Which makes me wonder why Dodge would even bring a light duty Cummins to the market with way less power compared to a GMC/Chevy.
Because, apparantly, it's not going to be competing with the Duramax. It's a light duty truck and not in the same HP wars as the big three HD trucks. Just as my VW TDI is a light duty diesel and is not intended to compete in the HP wars. I wish they'd put the Sprinter 5 cyl in the Dakota.
Because, apparantly, it's not going to be competing with the Duramax. It's a light duty truck and not in the same HP wars as the big three HD trucks. Just as my VW TDI is a light duty diesel and is not intended to compete in the HP wars. I wish they'd put the Sprinter 5 cyl in the Dakota.
#28
Registered User
There's nothing wrong with SCR-- but *I* would prefer to avoid the extra weight and complexity if another option was available.
Anyway, I'm glad to see Dodge coming out with something closer to a crew cab, and the storage built onto the top of the bed looks handy, too. When the HD version comes out I may have to go look at one.
#29
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
DPFs address soot or "particulates" and remove the smoke from the exhaust.
If you have a DPF, you'll have regen cycles. ALL diesels will have these-- it has been decreed from on high
Cooled EGR and SCR are both strategies to reduce NOx emissions. SCR reduces them in the tailpipe by spraying in urea ahead of a special kind of catalyst, and this reaction splits the NOx into separate N2 and O2.
Cooled EGR tries to keep the NOx from getting into the exhaust from the get-go by addressing the combustion conditions that lead to its formation. The problem is the NOx forms when combustion temps are high and there's lots of surplus oxygen-- the same conditions that general give you best fuel economy
The "emissions" diesels WILL get poorer fuel economy, no doubt about it. But the EPA thinks that a 15% reduction in mpg is acceptable for a 95%+ reduction in soot, NOx and other pollutants.
The higher pressure injection systems on newer diesels go a LONG way towards minimizing the mpg penalty of the emissions equipment. If you put all the emissions stuff (DPF, cat converter, EGR, etc) on an old 12V, that thing would get terribly mileage, I bet.
On the other hand, if the new technology could be employed unfettered by emissions and only had power and mpg as considerations, every CTD built would crack 20mpg empty.
jmo
If you have a DPF, you'll have regen cycles. ALL diesels will have these-- it has been decreed from on high
Cooled EGR and SCR are both strategies to reduce NOx emissions. SCR reduces them in the tailpipe by spraying in urea ahead of a special kind of catalyst, and this reaction splits the NOx into separate N2 and O2.
Cooled EGR tries to keep the NOx from getting into the exhaust from the get-go by addressing the combustion conditions that lead to its formation. The problem is the NOx forms when combustion temps are high and there's lots of surplus oxygen-- the same conditions that general give you best fuel economy
The "emissions" diesels WILL get poorer fuel economy, no doubt about it. But the EPA thinks that a 15% reduction in mpg is acceptable for a 95%+ reduction in soot, NOx and other pollutants.
The higher pressure injection systems on newer diesels go a LONG way towards minimizing the mpg penalty of the emissions equipment. If you put all the emissions stuff (DPF, cat converter, EGR, etc) on an old 12V, that thing would get terribly mileage, I bet.
On the other hand, if the new technology could be employed unfettered by emissions and only had power and mpg as considerations, every CTD built would crack 20mpg empty.
jmo
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still think that these light duty diesels are a joke. The only thing they're going to do is consume fuel what is already too high due to supply/demand and drive the prices higher.
Once the pricers go higher, who's gonna wanna drive a truck that gets better mileage on fuel thats 30-40 percent more?
Once the pricers go higher, who's gonna wanna drive a truck that gets better mileage on fuel thats 30-40 percent more?