Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices Use this forum to discuss your biodiesel information, and to find the best price on fuel.

Who killed the electric car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2008, 05:35 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mopar-or-no-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who killed the electric car

Has any one watched this movie, I just did and those electric cars were kind of impressive. I had never heard of them before. What do you guys think about them?
Old 03-21-2008, 09:02 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
kawi600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston, mASS
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Electric autos look good but thye need to solve a lot of problems to make them economically appealing.
the batteries are the biggest problem. they need to store a lot of power safely and be cheap to replace. I just have these nightmare visions of acid and heavy metals being splattered around in accidents or dumped in fields.
Theres an electric dirtbike I was lookin at but its replacement battery was like 2000$. yikes!
Old 03-21-2008, 09:32 AM
  #3  
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Shovelhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central VA
Posts: 9,076
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Storage Battery technology needs to get up to speed before the Electric Car will be more than a novelty toy for the "elite" tree-huggers.

A 20 - 30 mile range just won't make it in the real word
Old 03-21-2008, 10:04 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
GalenEdgewood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Gordon, GA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, if they can bump it up to 100-200 mile per charge, it'd be near ideal for most people in an urban environment. Of course, let's not forget the cost of electricity and having to get the electrical grid up to snuff to handle that kind of a draw of power to charge these things. And then there are the emissions of the increased number of power plants to provide the power (since so many are afraid of nuclear power plants).

All *kinds* of issues to worry about when it comes to electrical vehicles.
Old 03-21-2008, 10:13 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
speyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Battery issues aside, so far this one is pretty impressive. They claim it has a 200 mile range and 0 to 60 in 3.9 seconds is wicked quick.
Old 03-21-2008, 10:30 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
xp8103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 676
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem I see in so many "alternative" methods is that the folks that promote them do so with militant rage at times. Instead of looking at applications where electric cars work WELL its "**** THE OIL BURNERS! FULL STEAM (or electron) AHEAD!"
Electric cars make sense in MANY parts of the country but not so in others. Make electric cars PART of the solution instead of trying to make them THE solution I say!
Old 03-21-2008, 10:46 AM
  #7  
Administrator
 
patdaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Streator Illinois
Posts: 8,372
Received 171 Likes on 129 Posts
Good thoughts, and for SOME on the country, they could be a good thing.

Illinois in January or August is not conducive to electric cars.......... Unless you like to freeze or sweat.

As for the movie, I rank it right up there with Fahrenheit911........almost as intellectually vacant.
Old 03-21-2008, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
HOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
What's odd is that I just got this movie on Netflix last week.

Aside from the usual Leftist Bush conspiracy crap, it does raise some interesting questions.

When I was a fleet manager in GA, we had a couple gov't-mandated electric S-10 pickups that used the same technology as the EV1. They worked very well for bumming around the base-- basically as more capable golf carts.

But they apparently had a habit of catching on fire and GM recalled ours-- we never got them back.
Old 03-21-2008, 11:13 AM
  #9  
DTR's Toad Wrangler
 
Clayten's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N 48 25.707 W123 21.887
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The batteries where taken care of, they were using a Nikad battery. The fella that invented this battery sold the patent to Texaco. A few days later Chevron owned Texaco. Chevron did not want anyone to use these batteries.
Toyota tried to and Chevron sued Toyota successfully for 30 million dollars.
Do a Google on the electric car,make sure you have a punching bag close by.
Old 03-21-2008, 06:44 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mopar-or-no-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know they are not the only solution, but I think it would be nice to see them as an option so that the people that could use them could and the ones that need bigger vehicles with longer range can get what works for them. On the movie I believe they said that the battery technology they have would power the ev1 for 300 miles(thats what I remember maybe it was 200 but it wasnt bad). As for the power situation they say that there is way less power demand at night time becouse people are sleeping so there not using power and so they wouldnt need more power plants to charger them. I was thinking maybe they could also put solar panels on them to help keep a charge. I never thought about heat, maybe they could make some kind of heater simular to a toster element.
Old 03-21-2008, 07:02 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ian515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: an Alaskan living in Des Moines Iowa....
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if I remember the movie at all, the point was not that "THE" soloution needed to be electric, it was, why did the stop production of something that was so obvliously a success? i dont think the "tree huggers" cared about diesels, most understand its what drives our society, but they just wanted their car back.....hahaha.

they made a lot of great points though. and I love how now, "certain" people are talking about fully electric cars like they are a thing of the future, and have never been produced before.
Old 03-21-2008, 08:47 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
j-fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here is my opinion.
electric cars are what some people need. Great as commuter cars.
however, an electric motor will outlast several gas motors. Detriot cannot survive by making a car that we never HAVE to replace!!!! They are in business to mass produce transportation!!
Old 03-23-2008, 05:47 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
speyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ian515
if I remember the movie at all, the point was not that "THE" soloution needed to be electric, it was, why did the stop production of something that was so obvliously a success? i dont think the "tree huggers" cared about diesels, most understand its what drives our society, but they just wanted their car back.....hahaha.
Good post! There seems to be an excess of people on this forum that can't seem to discuss a single topic without spinning it into something about "greener, hippie, tree hugger, environmental wackos".
Old 03-28-2008, 01:02 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
twoscooterz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orcas Island, WA
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ranger EV

I have a '98 Ranger EV w/ lead acid batteries that escaped the crusher. It gets between 15 - 20 miles per charge. I am in the NW & live in a VERY hilly area. Hills really suck the battery life quickly. I use it on a 280 acre property & for short runs to town. It's perfect for anyone w/ small, in-town runs. The other down side to the Ranger set-up is that the charge pack is 220v only - no 110v option. Makes it even harder to run around and plug-in somewhere. For my application it is flawless - wouldn't dream of anything else (except more range). Rides & handles very well, heater warms instantly, quiet & people love it.
Old 03-28-2008, 10:20 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
kawi600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston, mASS
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
until they bring the battery cost down the new generation of lithium cels are going to be cost-prohibitive.
If youre worried about pollution, buying an electric car might be a BAD thing. The amount of heavy metals and nasty chemicals used to make these electrical parts is a lot higher. Lots of energy involved.
The other thing that worries me is anyone with a newer car has seen how crappy all these sensors and electronics are. They burn out and take a lot of money to fix since you need specialized diagnostic equipment and knowledge. The parts themselves are far from cheap.
This is why Im avoiding buying a newer car.. I cant afford to pay for all that stuff. The emissions crapola, the sensors and computers.. too much over-complex stuff to break.
I still think something simpler like vehicles fueled by compressed biogas or algae biodiesel will be the way to go. No new net co2 and the fuels can be made from waste streams.


Quick Reply: Who killed the electric car



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.