ABDTR #5 Alberta Chapter #5 Discussion
View Poll Results: Which date is best for a spring dyno at AFI
April 11
1
5.00%
April 18
2
10.00%
May 9
4
20.00%
May 23
13
65.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Spring Dyno at AFI Edmonton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #301  
kennyblatz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
i wish i could have stayed longer didn't even get to say hi to some, next time i won't be so dumb as to double book events on the same day.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #302  
ram4by's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Fort Chipewyan, Alberta
Yeah I was too busy to meet everyone as well. Under the hood in the corner..black dually...... What color was your truck? What is your first name?
Not Kenny?
Belated hello....
Steve.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #303  
Tate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie, Alberta
Originally Posted by Swamp_Donkey
Tate,

Did you still drive your truck that night? I should have stuck around a little longer I guess. Seemed you knew exactly what you where doing all calm and casual poking around under the hood.
Yea, it was only about 4 km down the road from where we were at. There was about a 2km stretch with no street lights, so I just waited for a car to pull along side me and I paced him until my turn off. I'm looking forward to the day when I can put the truck up on stands and give some much needed attention to a few issues.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #304  
Diesel Dave2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pickin on the wrong admin...
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 1
Sent Martin a thank email:

Hi Martin.....Thank you so much for opening your shop for our diesel dyno...All the members had a great time and it seems the number of diesel trucks turning out is growing.When we started 4 years ago we had maybe 8 trucks.Boy did we dirty up your shop.I hope you will still allow the diesel trucks to dyno after the soot mess we left you.


Martins reply:

Hey David,

I am glad everything went fairly well. I dont mind the mess, it is no biggie for me, and you guys are always welcome back.

Take care,

Martin
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #305  
bigd450's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta
Originally Posted by dodgediesel
Exact same numbers?? Need more turbo!!!
Those Mach 4.5's are just the perfect match to your turbo, aren't they!!!
Huh I would of thought it would of picked up some more power but I guess it confirms its needs more turbo. The twins should make it a pretty sweet ride.

Yeah those sticks seem to be a pretty good match. I might have to find a Smarty for next time and see how that helps. I don't think my truck was getting loaded enough judging by how late the power hit and it was only pulling 40psi and egt's were only 1200*.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #306  
ram4by's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Fort Chipewyan, Alberta
What gear you pull in?
I got 435/884 in 5th and only 409/727 in 4th....
Of course that's with 4.10's and 235/85's
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 04:08 PM
  #307  
bigd450's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta
I am pretty sure it was in 4th.

I guess I only got video's of Tate's and my truck.





What do you link of my engine rattle? Injectors??



Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #308  
NoSparkplugs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton,Alberta
Great day for sure! I'm surprised with the amount of power my truck put down. I figured my poor ol' stock tranny was going to rob me more than it did. I definitely have an idea of what I want to do to my truck next. Can you say turbo, FASS and tranny upgrades? I just gotta figure out what size of turbo I should throw on...Suggestions?

Also thanks to Martin and the crew again for letting us use their shop. Maybe next time someone could bring some tubing to slip over the exhaust to direct the smoke/fumes out of the shop? Just a thought...
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #309  
Mike Holmen's Avatar
The Guru
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,589
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie Canada
Last year, my truck only put down a 38 psi with twins and mach 6's. I dynoed 500rwhp in 3rd gear.

I ran with/without smarty, no difference between runs both on DDP stage #3's and mach 6's.

I think you have to spray NOS to lite all the fuel. My truck seems difficult to get the truck to come to life. This outting my pull I was around 30/32psi. I put down a 380rwhp on fuel and 450rwhp on methanol/H2O. My guess is that we aren't get a decent load on the roller to really push up the power curve. Could have pushed on the brakes to get the turbos to lite.

I've ran a few different dynos, Martin's dyno is tuff to make HP with just #2 fuel. Its consistant but you don't get the big HP numbers just running fuel. Every big HP run I've seen was on a NOS shot. A few years ago, everyone ran NOS and put up big HP pulls.

578 rwhp on mach 4.5 is awesome run and on only fuel, that one strong truck.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:08 PM
  #310  
bigd450's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta
Originally Posted by Mike Holmen
Last year, my truck only put down a 38 psi with twins and mach 6's. I dynoed 500rwhp in 3rd gear.

I ran with/without smarty, no difference between runs both on DDP stage #3's and mach 6's.

I think you have to spray NOS to lite all the fuel. My truck seems difficult to get the truck to come to life. This outting my pull I was around 30/32psi. I put down a 380rwhp on fuel and 450rwhp on methanol/H2O. My guess is that we aren't get a decent load on the roller to really push up the power curve. Could have pushed on the brakes to get the turbos to lite.

I've ran a few different dynos, Martin's dyno is tuff to make HP with just #2 fuel. Its consistant but you don't get the big HP numbers just running fuel. Every big HP run I've seen was on a NOS shot. A few years ago, everyone ran NOS and put up big HP pulls.

578 rwhp on mach 4.5 is awesome run and on only fuel, that one strong truck.
Thanks man. Yeah I don't think the dyno was loading them hard enough if you look at my graph I have no power under the curve. If it was loaded harder the turbo would lite sooner and I think it would make more torque and have made power for longer then just peaking. What do you guys think??

Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #311  
morkable's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 1
From: Fort McMurray, Alberta
pretty smooth graph, I would say that is about it... more turbo time
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:48 PM
  #312  
kennyblatz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
who is driving that silver 3rd gen with the sleddeck? i may be missing some of the principles of the dyno but could you not load the motor early via the brake?
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:51 PM
  #313  
han solo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
I think the day just had the right amount of people there. Was able to bs with people, talk to Maritin & not be rushed. Wasnt salesmen there trying to sell you stuff. Everybody got onto the dyno. Best part wasnt no poltics like like other events that go on in our sport. Had a great time.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 12:20 AM
  #314  
Dr. Evil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,129
Likes: 0
From: The Great White North
Originally Posted by Mike Holmen
Last year, my truck only put down a 38 psi with twins and mach 6's. I dynoed 500rwhp in 3rd gear.

I ran with/without smarty, no difference between runs both on DDP stage #3's and mach 6's.

I think you have to spray NOS to lite all the fuel. My truck seems difficult to get the truck to come to life. This outting my pull I was around 30/32psi. I put down a 380rwhp on fuel and 450rwhp on methanol/H2O. My guess is that we aren't get a decent load on the roller to really push up the power curve. Could have pushed on the brakes to get the turbos to lite.

I've ran a few different dynos, Martin's dyno is tuff to make HP with just #2 fuel. Its consistant but you don't get the big HP numbers just running fuel. Every big HP run I've seen was on a NOS shot. A few years ago, everyone ran NOS and put up big HP pulls.

578 rwhp on mach 4.5 is awesome run and on only fuel, that one strong truck.
What turbo were you running that day Mike?
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 01:21 AM
  #315  
Tate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie, Alberta
Originally Posted by bigd450
Thanks man. Yeah I don't think the dyno was loading them hard enough if you look at my graph I have no power under the curve. If it was loaded harder the turbo would lite sooner and I think it would make more torque and have made power for longer then just peaking. What do you guys think??

Comparing your graph to mine, our graphs are almost identical to about 2700, then you start to pick up a bit more until the end. It cuts off hard at 3200, thats for sure. Your turbo isn't much smaller than mine, but you'd think it would come in a bit sooner than it did. Did you measure your turbo when you got it? Maybe whoever sold it to you screwed up and you wound up with a 66, like what happened with Kevin. Just seems odd that our graphs are so close until the end.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.