Yes...its was a mobile...The paint wasn't even woren off yet..

 

I think that the dyno handed the truck pretty good for the most part.

I think that the lifted truck and heavy trucks might be the real test. My truck worked well, but my power level for my 10 is

 

Here you go Kevin..pics of the lot and dyno...Very good setup as for location and room.

 

More pics

 

Do you know what model number that unit was? Looks like it just has 24 or less inch rollers?

 

Hey Kevin, it was a Dynojet 224C. 24 inch rollers like you figured.


I posted the results, as of when I left, in the other thread before noticing this thread..

https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/...&postcount=136

 

Do you know if he was using his eddy brake? If not, those results actually could be reading a bit high due to the smaller rollers.

 

He started using it on the later trucks. Numbers were low at the beginning, since no one was getting full boost. Deb was the first one on, then redynoed later and put down another 50hp. He top number was 508. I think she did 560 in Mission. Not sure what dyno they have, but you were there.

 

my results were 436hp / 869lb/ft (corrected)

mach 2's
tst-pm3
smarty
ts-mvp
62.65.14
tunnelram plate
cai/4"tbe
built auto

 

Brain fart, yes your hp will be lower without the eddy. Downfall to the small 24inch drums. BD has a mustang dyno

 

The torque numbers seem low, but thats expected with these dyno models. IMHO of course. I had less HP but another 200 ft-lbs on that with the CCV dyno..

 

after really looking at my graph i see it started at ~2500 rpm - at which point my torque was highest for what was recorded. from looking at the graph, it is obvious the torque would have been higher if he was recording earlier . . .

 

His was one of the higher torque runs. There were several trucks that had low 400's and 6xx ft-lbs.

 

maybe it's the stout tranny from excell making the difference!

 

My truck was similary set-up at AFI as to Jasons is currently. I was around 440-450 and abit over 900 ft*lbs. Light speed I was 434HP and 929 ft*lbs. I don't think that they are that far off for power. I do agree that torque numbers look low. Hopefully they will be around and/or available for future dyno events. As for my 10 truck, I think that it was a very generous, 384rwhp

Can't believe we only had one event for 2010