'11 1 ton w/ urea?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'11 1 ton w/ urea?
I just seen a 2011 1 ton ( so he called it a 11, isn't it a little early for a 11 to be on the lot?) The urea tank is only 11" on the ground, how are us farmers and ranchers supposed to take this truck out in the pastures or fields without worrying about ripping the tank off. (the exhaust is only 11" off the ground also.) I thought the cummins met all the regs until 2012, at least that is what I have read, so why the need for the tank?
#3
Administrator / Severe Concussion Aficionado
3500, 4500, 5500 C&C should be the ones getting the urea treatment. The 2500 and 3500 pickups should remain the same.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just seen a 2011 1 ton ( so he called it a 11, isn't it a little early for a 11 to be on the lot?) The urea tank is only 11" on the ground, how are us farmers and ranchers supposed to take this truck out in the pastures or fields without worrying about ripping the tank off. (the exhaust is only 11" off the ground also.) I thought the cummins met all the regs until 2012, at least that is what I have read, so why the need for the tank?
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
urea
Is it not better to have the urea system than what we have now?? puting exhaust gases back into the engine.Or is that something that is added on to our present system?I am under the notion that with the urea you do not recirculate the exhaust gases back into the engine.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it not better to have the urea system than what we have now?? puting exhaust gases back into the engine.Or is that something that is added on to our present system?I am under the notion that with the urea you do not recirculate the exhaust gases back into the engine.
Guys, urea/SCR is NOT a bad thing...it lets them tune the engine for efficiency, you know make efficient, dirty power, and then they treat the exhaust afterwards. Yes, you need to add urea...but even with the added cost of urea, you will still save money on fuel.
What is the problem??
Chris
#10
As we all know, the current system in the 2500 and 3500 pickups is 100% maintenance free and self-contained with no fluids or tanks. I think that Dodge / Cummins made the call that for the end-user, this was the more complete and easy solution. Was it the right call from a sales / business decision? Time will tell. With the Ford and GM trucks coming out with engines / trucks that use Urea tanks, it might become accepted and commonplace. The efficiency hit the Dodge / Cummins solution brings might end up biting Dodge / Cummins in the butt even though it's 100% maintenance free. I don't personally care either way -- I would have bought this truck anyway even if I had to fill a Urea tank...
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the EPA basically mandating the use of Urea (with no other known method of meeting Tier 4 Final emissions levels) it will become commonplace.
Chris
Chris
#12
Chris -- Does this mean that our emission system doesn't meet the Tier 4 Final emissions levels? What Tier does our emission system meet? Thx...
#13
Administrator / Severe Concussion Aficionado
Not sure what tier they meet right now, but you can bet your bottom dollar that the EPA will not stop imposing ridiculous standards until our tailpipes emit nothing but unicorn farts.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sad, but funny!
Chris
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't find the regs for "light duty" trucks...but I do know Cummins will be using it on all other on road engines, from the ISB6.7, to the ISX. As stated before, in this thread, it will also go into the "commercial" trucks from Dodge.
Basically, I'd plan to see it sooner than later in the 2500-3500...if it works like it should, they would see better fuel efficiency from it, and from what I'm seeing from my 2010, I would like even better economy. I mean, 16-17mpg average empty is nice, but why not 20mpg from my 8K lb truck
Chris
Basically, I'd plan to see it sooner than later in the 2500-3500...if it works like it should, they would see better fuel efficiency from it, and from what I'm seeing from my 2010, I would like even better economy. I mean, 16-17mpg average empty is nice, but why not 20mpg from my 8K lb truck
Chris