3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

Caps and Fuel Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2007, 02:21 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bluedeviltorque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Hardware City
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Caps and Fuel Mileage

Those of you with 3rd Gen's and Caps, specifically long bed quad cab, did you see any improvement in Fuel Mileage after installing the cap? I'm not looking for better milege from it, but i'm just curious as to is impact.

And of course all truck models can chime in not just QCLB's (That just what I have)

Mike.
Old 01-11-2007, 07:45 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
randy.pratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Round Rock Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many variables to tell for sure

I went for about 6 months with an open bed (with the tailgate up/closed) then ran for about 9 months with a SnugTop lid. I changed to a cab high Glasstite shell recently. All of this on a truck that only has about 15K miles to date. Between the CTD breaking in, ULSD introduction, etc. about the only conclusive thing I can advise is that my fuel economy hasn’t gone down. I’m anxious to get my camper trailer on the road with the Glasstite shell as I think it will help. But again, even if its better I don’t know what gains I can attribute to the non-open bed vs. break-in.

I think my driving style is moderate. I typically get 16.5 MPG around town, stop & go, 19.5+ MPG on long road trips, 14+ MPG with either the camper or boat in tow (which has accounted for a lot of the miles on this truck as I usually ride my motorcycle to work.)

In my case, not enough miles and too many variables to draw any sound conclusions. The only thing I’ve done that definitely had an immediate, measurable effect is higher tire pressure.
Old 01-11-2007, 09:45 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Blast Chamber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did not notice any change in mileage after installing an ARE cap. The weight of the fiberglass probably offsets any aerodynamic gains. Overall I have been very pleased with the build quality of my ARE.
Old 01-11-2007, 10:10 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Nitro71455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No differance in MPG here, but your stuff stays dry!
Old 01-11-2007, 12:07 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
subspd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
x2 no difference but it locks and keeps things dry.
Old 01-12-2007, 01:25 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
BigBlueDodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another satisfied owner here. I agree with the others, I haven't noticed much change. The key is my MPG didn't go down and I'm happy with that. I love being able to keep the bed covered, locked and dry. I'm VERY happy with my ARE. I had and ASTRO lid on my 2004.5 and the ARE is much better than the ASTRO.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:20 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
06megacabman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Myth busters did a show on this an concluded that there was no real difference and for the VERY small amount there may be it could be attributed to the slight variances in friction, temp, engine effeciency and so on from truck to truck.
Old 01-12-2007, 11:41 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
kokalit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't know about fuel milage but

My undercover cap is only about 50-60lbs, easy to remove when necessary, comes in black but can be painted and is very strong. Stood in middle of mine while using it to get up on roof to put on Christmas lights, no sag. Website shows a team of kids all sitting on top of one.
Old 01-12-2007, 11:45 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
wcjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tacoma, Wa
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No difference with Mega/canopy.
Old 01-13-2007, 02:54 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
CRIMPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NE Tarrant Co, Texas
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the torque in these trucks there would be little gain in MPG. That being said...my last truck was a 4cylinder Nissan Frontier with a cap. On road trips I saw a very noticeable increase in MPG. The increase was closer to 2 MPG's. Wind resistance plays a huge role on these no-torque trucks.

My two cents...

Z
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookshelf
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
12
12-28-2008 12:28 AM
MadFrog
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
12
10-20-2006 01:11 PM
Kman9090
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
09-19-2006 11:25 AM
truckjunkie
General Diesel Discussion
3
08-28-2006 01:42 PM
FireNhole
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
4
01-02-2003 10:28 AM



Quick Reply: Caps and Fuel Mileage



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.