3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

2009 Ram

Old Jun 5, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #1  
polcat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
2009 Ram

Do you guys think that the 2009 rams will have a similar appearance like that of the new 2008 Dakota (same style but bigger)?

2009 Dodge Ram: http://www.allpar.com/model/ram/2009-ram.html

2008 Dakota: http://www.leftlanenews.com/2008-dod...-revealed.html
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #2  
iker42's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 2
From: Christiana,Pa
the 1500(pictured there) will be a different style then the 2500/3500's

no info yet on the 2500/3500's
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #3  
ASHNBAK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: LAKEWOOD, CA
Do you guy's think we'll ever see a real crew cab or just the mega. Drove an F350 last night
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #4  
06PSD4ME's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: south Florida
I hope not, I think the Dakotas are BUTT ULGY!
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #5  
dieselJon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Dixon, IL
Not with those wheels hopefully
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
tomm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
I got me mine, they can screw up the new ones all they want.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #7  
steelblitzkrieg's Avatar
DTR Detective
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 10
From: Antioch, Ca
Originally Posted by ASHNBAK
Do you guy's think we'll ever see a real crew cab or just the mega. Drove an F350 last night

Is that what the Megacab would be considered?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:48 PM
  #8  
rbrettctd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 0
From: Cresson/Stephenville Texas
2 years down the road and still no real cab. I agree ashnbak.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #9  
steelblitzkrieg's Avatar
DTR Detective
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 10
From: Antioch, Ca
Are you guy's referring to the interior being superior in the Ford? If so, Dodge could do it easily enough but would you be willing to pay 10k more?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #10  
Luvnacumns's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,194
Likes: 0
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Originally Posted by steelblitzkrieg
Are you guy's referring to the interior being superior in the Ford? If so, Dodge could do it easily enough but would you be willing to pay 10k more?
Well said. I consider my mega cab to be inferior to a ferd!!!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #11  
BlackSunShyne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 1
From: VA
Isn't the exhaust pipe kinda small in those pics!?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #12  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Is it just me or does that 2nd pic look more like a Cheby?

So the 1500's are going to get a V8 Cummins motor? I guess the 2500/3500's won't be too far behind then. Sure glad I got a 5.9!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #13  
nitis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
why go to a v8 whrn you could use the 4 banger version of the 5.9
I always wanted a hlf ton with a 4 cyl cummins 30mpg baby
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #14  
7egend's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
the dakotas are ugly, I was lucky to have my 97 i still have it even though i have my Mega Cab, and as far as the Ford Vs. Dodge cabs? I like having my extra foot of room, and have you road in a ford for a long haul? ow...my back hurts...that would make me file a workers comp claim against who evers truck it was..oh yea the ford rides rough...so it doesnt help the interior. sure it looks good if its the King Ranch.

But my Laramie is the perfect look and feel. To be honest the Dodge interior is first, the Chevy second and the Ford last...thats just me, I dont see my self following everyones opinion.

Now for a V8 Cummins....why...the 6 cyl is more than plenty in these trucks. also the 4 banger cummins would make a great addition to the Dakota, they were rumors of it being in this body style but maybe the next...hopefully.

The Dakota needs some more refinement than what it has the Toyota Taco, and the Nissan Frontier are the fore-runners in the mid size truck segment. I dont see the Big Three catching up with Toyota and Nissan...
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #15  
Thundercloud's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by 06PSD4ME
I hope not, I think the Dakotas are BUTT ULGY!
I second that comment.



Originally Posted by nitis
why go to a v8 whrn you could use the 4 banger version of the 5.9
I always wanted a hlf ton with a 4 cyl cummins 30mpg baby
Ya that is a bit strange. One of Cummins selling points is that the inline 6 has 30% fewer moving parts then a V8 platform. Does Cummins still make a inline 4 banger (3.9L) for a passenger vehicle or do they just make them for construction and ag equipment?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.